Epidemiology and management of proximal tibia fractures in children and adolescents: a population-based study based on the Kids' Fracture Tool.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Proximal tibial fractures are infrequent injuries in children, and the literature on epidemiology, associated injuries, and management is limited. We calculated a population-based incidence and described the characteristics of proximal tibial fractures in children in terms of complications and management. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study over a 6-year-period during including 241 children with proximal tibial fractures who presented to our university hospital. Demographic and fracture-related data was collected from the Kids' Fracture Tool. The number of children during the study period was collected from statistical yearbooks of the City of Helsinki to estimate annual incidence. RESULTS: Extra-articular fractures (129/241) peaked at the age of 3 and tibial tubercle (42/241) and intra-articular fractures (70/241) peaked at the age of 15. Annual incidences were estimated to be 3.4/100,000 children and 22/100,000 children in the age group of 13-16 years for ACL avulsions, and 3.8/100,000 children and 21/100,000 children in the age group of 13-16 years for tibial tubercle fractures. The incidence of vascular compromise (0%) and compartment syndrome was low (0.4 %, 1/241). CONCLUSION: Proximal tibial fractures present with a bimodal distribution, with extra-articular fractures peaking at the age of 3 years and fractures of the tibial tuberosity and intra-articular fractures peaking at the age of 15 years. Additionally, associated compartment syndrome and vascular compromise was not as common as previously reported.

Routine follow-up is unnecessary after intramedullary fixation of trochanteric femoral fractures-Analysis of 995 cases.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Approximately 2000 trochanteric fractures are operated in Finland annually. These fractures make a major burden to health care system and affected individuals. The role of routine follow-up has been questioned in multiple fracture types. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed routine follow-up visits after intramedullary fixation of trochanteric fractures (n = 995). Patients were followed up from patient registries until 2 years or death. Planned and unplanned follow-up visits were analyzed. RESULTS: Altogether 9 patients (0.9%) had a change in treatment at planned outpatient visit. 6 of these were due to mechanical complication, 1 due to refracture and 2 due to delayed unions. 64 (6.4%) patients had a change in treatment plan because of an unplanned visit: 28 infections, 6 pressure sores, 15 mechanic complications and 14 refractures and 1 AVN, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Routine follow-up visits are a burden both to the patients and health care system, with less than 1% leading to changes in treatment. Our suggestion is to give good instructions to patients and rehabilitation facilities instead of routine follow-up.