[Cost-effectiveness analysis of blue light cystoscopy with hexylaminolevulinate in transurethral resection of the bladder]. / Kosten-Effektivitäts-Analyse zur Verwendung der Blaulichtzystoskopie mit Hexylaminolevulinat bei der transurethralen Resektion der Harnblase.

BACKGROUND: Photodynamic diagnosis using the optical imaging agent hexaminolevulinate (HAL, Hexvix®, Ipsen Pharma GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany) as an adjunct to white light cystoscopy (WLC) during the initial transurethral resection of bladder tumours (TURB) improves the detection rate of bladder cancer and leads to fewer recurrences. OBJECTIVES: A cost-effectiveness analysis was carried out in order to calculate the consequences for the German healthcare system. METHODS: We combined a short-term decision tree and a Markov model to evaluate outcomes over a long period of time. The alternatives investigated were HAL-assisted blue light cystoscopy (BLC) as adjunct to WLC (HAL + BLC/WLC) compared with WLC alone in patients undergoing TURB. RESULTS: HAL + BLC/WLC compared to WLC alone was associated with 0.07 incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and cost savings of 537 € per patient. CONCLUSION: HAL + BLC/WLC compared with WLC alone resulted in both cost savings and improved patient outcome rendering it the "dominant" strategy.

[Cell-based therapy to treat stress urinary incontinence: which cell type at what cost?]. / Zellbasierte Therapie der Belastungsinkontinenz: Welche Zelle zu welchen Kosten?

In Germany, 6-8 million woman and men suffer urinary incontinence, which represents 12.5 % of the population. It is estimated that by the middle of this century, it will increase to almost 30 %. The primary reason will be primarily related to the aging population but also to patient awareness and seeking a solution. In addition to the cost which is covered by the health insurance, the patient will spend more than half a billion euro/year out-of-pocket, not to mention the social stigma associated with urinary incontinence. The current common treatment options are symptomatic but do not restore functionality. One option might be tissue engineering or stem cell therapy. This article describes the likelihood that this therapy will change the approach in treating stress urinary incontinence. Boundaries and legal aspects are highlighted as well as approximated cost. These treatment costs might be currently higher than the standard treatment options, but the investment to reduce these costs are paid indirectly by society.

Cost effective laparoendoscopic single-site surgery with a reusable platform.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many disposable platforms have been applied in laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS). Besides technical issues, cost is one of the limiting factors for its widespread acceptance. The current study describes the first completely reusable LESS-platform. METHODS: We performed LESS-procedures in 52 patients including nephrectomy (18), adrenalectomy (2), partial nephrectomy (3), pyeloplasty (4), renal cyst ablation (4), pelvic lymphadenectomy (15), and lymphocele ablation (6). All procedures were conducted using a novel reusable single-port device (X-Cone, Karl-Storz) with a simplified set of instruments. We obtained perioperative and demographic data, including a visual analogue pain scale (VAS), and a complication reporting system based on Clavien grading. RESULTS: Mean age was 50.04 y. Conversion to standard laparoscopy was necessary in 3 cases and addition of a needlescopic instrument in 6 cases. There was no open conversion. Intra- and postoperative complications occurred in 3 (Clavien II in 2 and III in 1) cases. Mean operative time was 110, 90, and 89 min, and hospital stay was 4.9, 3.1, and 3.6 d for nephrectomy, pelvic lymphadenectomy, and pyeloplasty, respectively. Mean VAS was 2.13, 1.07, and 1.5 while blood loss was 81.3 mL, 25.67 mL, and 17.5 mL, respectively. Mean lymph node yield was 15 (range, 8 to 21). CONCLUSIONS: A completely reusable LESS-platform is applicable to various uses in urology, yielding favorable functional and cosmetic results. Reusable materials are useful to reduce the cost of LESS, further increasing its acceptance. LESS with a completely reusable platform is more cost effective than standard laparoscopy.

Economic aspects of bladder cancer: what are the benefits and costs?

OBJECTIVE: Bladder cancer (BC) has the highest lifetime treatment costs per patient of all cancers. The high recurrence rate and ongoing invasive monitoring requirement are the key contributors to the economic and human toll of this disease. The purpose of this paper was to utilize the recent literature to identify opportunities for improving the benefits and costs of BC care. METHODS: A PubMed search was performed of recent publications concerning (BC) cost-effectiveness. We reviewed studies, reviews, opinion papers and cost-effectiveness analyses, focusing primarily on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (Ta/T1; NMIBC). RESULTS: New diagnostic tools such as urine markers may assist in more cost-effectively detecting BC at an earlier stage, however, these markers cannot replace the cystoscopy, which is the current standard of care. A photodynamic diagnostic tool (PDD) using hexylaminolevulinate (Hexvix) enhances tumor visibility and improves transurethral resection of bladder cancer (TURB) results, potentially reducing recurrence rates and lowering treatment costs. While the importance of BC research has been acknowledged, research investment has been continuously reduced during the last 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: The economic burden of BC is well-characterized in the literature. This study suggests that new technologies (i.e., urine-based tests, PDD) and therapeutic regimes (intravesical chemotherapy, adjuvant immunotherapy) have significant potential to improve the diagnosis, treatment and on-going monitoring of BC patients, with potential improvements in clinical outcomes and concurrent cost-savings. A renewed interest and investment in BC research are required to ensure future advancements.