The prevalence and management of chronic pain in the Chinese population: findings from the China Pain Health Index (2020).

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is a common disease; about 20% of people worldwide suffer from it. While compared with the research on the prevalence and management of chronic pain in developed countries, there is a relative lack of research in this field in China. This research aims to construct the China Pain Health Index (CPHI) to evaluate the current status of the prevalence and management of chronic pain in the Chinese population. METHODS: The dimensions and indicators of CPHI were determined through literature review, Delphi method, and analytical hierarchy process model, and the original values ​​of relevant indicators were obtained by collecting multi-source data. National and sub-provincial scores of CPHI (2020) were calculated by co-directional transformation, standardization, percentage transformation of the aggregate, and weighted summation. RESULTS: The highest CPHI score in 2020 is Beijing, and the lowest is Tibet. The top five provinces are Beijing (67.64 points), Shanghai (67.04 points), Zhejiang (65.74 points), Shandong (61.16 points), and Tianjin (59.99 points). The last five provinces are Tibet (33.10 points), Ningxia (37.24 points), Guizhou (39.85 points), Xinjiang (39.92 points), and Hainan (40.38 points). The prevalence of chronic pain is severe in Heilongjiang, Chongqing, Guizhou, Sichuan, and Fujian. Guizhou, Hainan, Xinjiang, Beijing, and Guangdong display a high burden of chronic pain. The five provinces of Guangdong, Shanghai, Beijing, Jiangsu, and Zhejiang have better treatment for chronic pain, while Tibet, Qinghai, Jilin, Ningxia, and Xinjiang have a lower quality of treatment. Beijing, Shanghai, Qinghai, Guangxi, and Hunan have relatively good development of chronic pain disciplines, while Tibet, Sichuan, Inner Mongolia, Hebei, and Guizhou are relatively poor. CONCLUSION: The economically developed provinces in China have higher CPHI scores, while economically underdeveloped areas have lower scores. The current pain diagnosis and treatment situation in economically developed regions is relatively good, while that in financially underdeveloped areas is rather poor. According to the variations in the prevalence and management of chronic pain among populations in different provinces in China, it is necessary to implement chronic pain intervention measures adapted to local conditions.

Using the Medication Adherence Reasons Scale (MAR-Scale) in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to determine the extent and identify the reasons for non-adherence.

INTRODUCTION: Adherence to medications for asthma and COPD can reduce exacerbation rates, decrease healthcare costs, and improve health-related quality of life. In spite of the advantages to treatment adherence, individuals with asthma and COPD often fail to take medicines as prescribed. The objectives of this study were to determine the extent of non-adherence with asthma and COPD medicines and to describe the reasons for non-adherence in these conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from the National Health and Wellness Study (NHWS), a self-administered, annual, internet-based cross-sectional survey of US adults from 2018 was used. NHWS participants who self-reported taking daily prescription medication(s) to treat asthma and COPD responded to the 19 reasons for non-adherence and one global item in the Medication Adherence Reasons Scale (MAR-Scale). Frequencies were used to identify the reasons for non-adherence. RESULTS: The non-adherence rate in asthma (N = 2810) was 38.4% and 28.4% in COPD (N = 1632). For both conditions, "simply missing the medicine" was the most common cause of non-adherence. Additionally, for both conditions, there was a difference between the non-adherence reason reported by more individuals and the reason for which the medicine was missed for the most number of days. CONCLUSION: The MAR-Scale identified the most frequent reasons for non-adherence with asthma and COPD in a nationwide sample in the US. The MAR-Scale can be used as a tool in a clinic setting or at a population level to measure the extent and the reasons for non-adherence.

Health-related characteristics and unmet needs of men with erectile dysfunction: a survey in five European countries.

INTRODUCTION: Data suggest that ED is still an underdiagnosed and undertreated condition. In addition, it seems that men with ED are unsatisfied about their relationship with their physician and with the available drugs. AIM: The study aims to identify health-related characteristics and unmet needs of patients suffering from erectile dysfunction (ED) in big 5 European Union (EU) nations (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and UK). METHODS: Data were collected from the 2011 5EU National Health and Wellness-Survey on a population of 28,511 adult men (mean age: 47.18; SD 16.07) and was focused on men (5,184) who self-reported ED in the past 6 months. In addition, the quality of life (QoL) and work productivity/activity were explored. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Health-related QoL (HRQoL) and work productivity were measured with SF-12v2 and WPAI validated psychometric tools. RESULTS: One in every 20 young men (age 18-39) across 5EU experienced ED in the past 6 months. About half of men (2,702/5,184; [52%]) with ED across all ages did not discuss their condition with their physician. Interestingly, among those men who did discuss their condition with their physician, 68% (1,668/2,465) do not currently use medication. These findings were more evident in the age group of 18-39 years. Only 48% (2,465/5,184) had a closer relationship with their physician, suggesting that this quality of relationship may be unsatisfactory. Compared with controls, ED patients have a significantly higher intrapsychic and relational psychopathological comorbid burden and relevant decreasing in HRQoL, with a significantly higher impairment on work productivity/activity. CONCLUSION: Data suggest that there is a need for a new therapeutic paradigm in ED treatment which images the achievement of a new alliance between physician and patient. Hence, alternative drug delivery strategies may reduce the psychological and social impact of this disease.