The impact of optimal dating on the assessment of fetal growth.

BACKGROUND: The impact of using the Intergrowth (IG) dating formulae in comparison to the commonly used Robinson dating on the evaluation of biometrics and estimated fetal weight (EFW) has not been evaluated. METHODS: Nationwide cross-sectional study of routine fetal ultrasound biometry in low-risk pregnant women whose gestational age (GA) had been previously assessed by a first trimester CRL measurement. We compared the CRL-based GA according to the Robinson formula and the IG formula. We evaluated the fetal biometric measurements as well as the EFW taken later in pregnancy depending on the dating formula used. Mean and standard deviation of the Z scores as well as the number and percentage of cases classified as <3rd, < 10th, >90th and > 97th percentile were compared. RESULTS: Three thousand five hundred twenty-two low-risk women with scans carried out after 18 weeks were included. There were differences of zero, one and 2 days in 642 (18.2%), 2700 (76.7%) and 180 (5%) when GA was estimated based on the Robinson or the IG formula, respectively. The biometry Z scores assessed later in pregnancy were all statistically significantly lower when the Intergrowth-based dating formula was used (p < 10- 4). Likewise, the number and percentage of foetuses classified as <3rd, < 10th, >90th and > 97th percentile demonstrated significant differences. As an example, the proportion of SGA foetuses varied from 3.46 to 4.57% (p = 0.02) and that of LGA foetuses from 17.86 to 13.4% (p < 10- 4). CONCLUSION: The dating formula used has a quite significant impact on the subsequent evaluation of biometry and EFW. We suggest that the combined and homogeneous use of a recent dating standard, together with prescriptive growth standards established on the same low-risk pregnancies, allows an optimal assessment of fetal growth.

Refining the prognosis of fetuses infected with Cytomegalovirus in the first trimester of pregnancy by serial prenatal assessment: a single-centre retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To define the predictive value (PV) of known prognostic factors of fetal infection with Cytomegalovirus following maternal primary infection <14 weeks of gestation, at different time points of pregnancy: the end of the second trimester; following prenatal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 32 weeks of gestation; and using all ultrasound scans performed in the third trimester (US3rdT). DESIGN: A retrospective study. SETTING: Reference fetal medicine unit. POPULATION: Sixty-two fetuses infected <14 weeks of gestation. METHODS: We defined second-trimester assessment (STA) as the combination of ultrasound findings <28 weeks of gestation and fetal platelet count at cordocentesis. Three groups were defined: normal, extracerebral, and cerebral STA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For each group, the PV of STA alone, STA + MRI, and STA + US3rdT were assessed retrospectively. Outcome at birth and at follow-up were reported. RESULTS: The STA was normal, and with extracerebral and cerebral features, in 43.5, 42.0, and 14.5%, respectively. The negative PV of normal STA and MRI for moderate to severe sequelae was 100%. The residual risk was unilateral hearing loss in 16.7% of cases. Of pregnancies with cerebral STA, 44% were terminated. Following extracerebral STA, 48% of neonates were symptomatic and 30% had moderate to severe sequelae. In those cases, the positive and negative PV of MRI for sequelae were 33 and 73%, respectively. STA + US3rdT had a lower negative PV than MRI for symptoms at birth and for moderate to severe sequelae. Any false-positive findings at MRI were mostly the result of hypersignals of white matter. CONCLUSIONS: Serial assessment in the second and third trimesters by ultrasound and MRI is necessary to predict the risk of sequelae occurring in 35% of pregnancies following fetal infection in the first trimester of pregnancy. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Serial ultrasound prognostic assessment following fetal CMV infection in the 1st trimester is improved by MRI at 32 weeks.

ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth.

INTRODUCTION These Guidelines aim to describe appropriate assessment of fetal biometry and diagnosis of fetal growth disorders. These disorders consist mainly of fetal growth restriction (FGR), also referred to as intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and often associated with small­for­gestational age (SGA), and large­for­gestational age (LGA), which may lead to fetal macrosomia; both have been associated with a variety of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Screening for, and adequate management of, fetal growth abnormalities are essential components of antenatal care, and fetal ultrasound plays a key role in assessment of these conditions. The fetal biometric parameters measured most commonly are biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur diaphysis length (FL). These biometric measurements can be used to estimate fetal weight (EFW) using various different formulae1. It is important to differentiate between the concept of fetal size at a given timepoint and fetal growth, the latter being a dynamic process, the assessment of which requires at least two ultrasound scans separated in time. Maternal history and symptoms, amniotic fluid assessment and Doppler velocimetry can provide additional information that may be used to identify fetuses at risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. Accurate estimation of gestational age is a prerequisite for determining whether fetal size is appropriate­for­gestational age (AGA). Except for pregnancies arising from assisted reproductive technology, the date of conception cannot be determined precisely. Clinically, most pregnancies are dated by the last menstrual period, though this may sometimes be uncertain or unreliable. Therefore, dating pregnancies by early ultrasound examination at 8­14 weeks, based on measurement of the fetal crown­rump length (CRL), appears to be the most reliable method to establish gestational age. Once the CRL exceeds 84 mm, HC should be used for pregnancy dating2­4. HC, with or without FL, can be used for estimation of gestational age from the mid­trimester if a first­trimester scan is not available and the menstrual history is unreliable. When the expected delivery date has been established by an accurate early scan, subsequent scans should not be used to recalculate the gestational age1. Serial scans can be used to determine if interval growth has been normal. In these Guidelines, we assume that the gestational age is known and has been determined as described above, the pregnancy is singleton and the fetal anatomy is normal. Details of the grades of recommendation used in these Guidelines are given in Appendix 1. Reporting of levels of evidence is not applicable to these Guidelines.

Pautas de ISUOG para la práctica: evaluación ecográfica de la biometría y el crecimiento fetal INTRODUCCIÓN: El objetivo de estas Pautas es describir la evaluación adecuada de la biometría fetal y el diagnóstico de los trastornos del crecimiento fetal. Estos trastornos consisten principalmente en la restricción del crecimiento fetal (RCF), también conocida como restricción del crecimiento intrauterino (RCIU), que a menudo está asociada con un tamaño pequeño para la edad gestacional (PEG) o grande para la edad gestacional (GEG), que pueden dar lugar a la macrosomía fetal; ambos se han asociado con una variedad de resultados maternos y perinatales adversos. La detección y el tratamiento adecuado de las anomalías del crecimiento fetal son componentes esenciales de la atención prenatal, y la ecografía fetal desempeña un papel fundamental en la evaluación de estas afecciones. Los parámetros biométricos fetales medidos con mayor frecuencia son (todas las siglas procedentes del inglés) el diámetro biparietal (BPD), el perímetro cefálico (HC), el perímetro abdominal (AC) y la longitud de la diáfisis del fémur (FL). Estas mediciones biométricas se pueden utilizar para estimar el peso del feto (PEF) mediante fórmulas diferentes1 . Es importante diferenciar entre el concepto de tamaño fetal en un momento dado y el crecimiento fetal en sí, siendo este último un proceso dinámico cuya evaluación requiere al menos dos ecografías separadas en el tiempo. La historia y los síntomas de la madre, la evaluación del líquido amniótico y la velocimetría Doppler pueden proporcionar información adicional que se puede utilizar para identificar los fetos bajo riesgo de resultados adversos del embarazo. La estimación precisa de la edad gestacional es un prerrequisito para determinar si el tamaño del feto es apropiado para la edad gestacional (AEG). Excepto en el caso de los embarazos procedentes de tecnologías de reproducción asistida, la fecha de concepción no se puede determinar con precisión. Clínicamente, la fecha de la mayoría de los embarazos se establece en función del último período menstrual, aunque a veces esto puede ser incierto o poco fiable. Por lo tanto, el fechado de los embarazos mediante ecografía temprana a las 8-14 semanas, mediante la medición de la longitud céfalo-caudal (LCC) fetal, parece ser el método más fiable para establecer la edad gestacional. Una vez que la LCC excede los 84 mm, se debe usar el HC2-4 para establecer la fecha del embarazo. El HC, con o sin FL, se puede utilizar para estimar la edad gestacional a partir de la mitad del primer trimestre si no se dispone de una ecografía del primer trimestre y el historial menstrual no es fiable. Cuando se ha establecido la fecha prevista del parto mediante una exploración temprana precisa, no se deben utilizar exploraciones posteriores para recalcular la edad gestacional1 . Las exploraciones en serie se pueden utilizar para determinar si el intervalo del crecimiento ha sido normal. En estas Pautas se asume que la edad gestacional es conocida y ha sido determinada según lo anterior, que el embarazo es de feto único y que la anatomía fetal es normal. En el Apéndice 1 se detallan los grados de recomendación utilizados en estas Pautas. El informe sobre los niveles de evidencia no es aplicable a estas Pautas.

Pulmonary stenosis in complicated monochorionic twin pregnancies: prevalence, management and outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To review prevalence, management and prognostic factors of pulmonary stenosis (PS) in monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) pregnancies complicated by twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). METHODS: Retrospective study over the last 10 years in a single referral center. We reviewed fetal echocardiography data of all MC twin cases with diagnosis of isolated PS. We assessed fetoscopy characteristics of those that underwent laser coagulation. We collected data regarding perinatal outcome, neonatal echocardiography and cardiac management. RESULTS: We found 24 cases of isolated PS among 2091 MCDA pregnancies. Among 1052 complicated MCDA that underwent fetal laser surgery, 22 (2.09%) developed PS of which 20 were diagnosed prenatally. Two cases were diagnosed in uncomplicated MCDA pregnancies (0.2%). Four of 22 (18.18%) cases with TTTS showed in utero regression after laser treatment. Thirteen newborns (65%) required valvular dilatation. Peak systolic velocities in the pulmonary artery trunk (PSV-PA) at diagnosis and the interval between the diagnosis of TTTS and that of PS were significantly different (p < 0.001 and p = 0.05 respectively) between PS requiring cardiac intervention and those who did not. CONCLUSION: An elevated PSV-PA at the time of PS diagnosis and a short time-interval between fetoscopic laser surgery and PS diagnosis are predictive of the need for interventional treatment after birth.

Optimal risk assessment of small-for-gestational-age fetuses using 31-34-week biometry in a low-risk population.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of traditional growth charts for estimated fetal weight (EFW) and a validated pragmatic probabilistic approach using biometry at 31-34 weeks' gestation to screen for late pregnancy small-for-gestational age (SGA) fetuses in a low-risk population. METHODS: Records of ultrasound biometry at 31-34 weeks were reviewed in 7755 consecutive low-risk women between 2002 and 2011. Fetal malformations, Doppler anomalies and preterm delivery before 37 weeks were excluded. SGA was defined by various percentile cut-offs of birth weight. The probability of SGA was modeled as a function of Z-scores of femur length, abdominal circumference and head circumference. The model was validated on a second independent dataset of 1725 pregnancies from a different screening unit. The screening performance of this probabilistic approach was compared with those of traditional EFW growth charts. The additional value of factoring in maternal characteristics was also ascertained. RESULTS: Using national birth-weight charts, the proportions of newborns at 37-42 weeks with birth weight<3(rd) , <5(th) and<10(th) centiles were 3%, 6% and 12%, respectively, and there was a 2% rate of birth weight<2500 g. For a 10% false-positive rate, a direct probabilistic approach yielded a 51% detection rate of neonates with birth weight<10(th) centile, compared to the 32% and 48% detection rates given by the 10(th) centile cut-off of two reference charts for EFW. Adding maternal characteristics significantly improved detection rate by 2% to 53%. CONCLUSIONS: The suggested validated approach to screening for late SGA fetuses outperforms traditional approaches using growth charts. By adding maternal characteristics, this screening method offers a favorable alternative to customized charts.

A nomogram for perioperative prognostic risk-assessment in twin-twin transfusion syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Prognostic assessment in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) is ill-defined. The objective of this study is to define a perioperative prognostic score for TTTS treated by percutaneous laser coagulation. METHODS: Consecutive cases of TTTS treated by percutaneous fetoscopic laser coagulation over a 6-year period were reviewed. Twin survival at 28 days was considered using a 3-level polytomous variable defined by 0, 1, or 2 fatal events. A multivariate prognostic analysis with internal validation was conducted using gestational age at diagnosis, weight discordance, umbilical artery, and ductus venosus abnormalities in the donor and the recipient respectively, cervical length, selectivity of surgery, and transplacental approach. RESULTS: On the basis of 507 cases, the perinatal survival rate of 2 and 1 twin was 46.2% and 31.5%, respectively. Statistically significant factors included umbilical artery abnormalities in the donor, gestational age, and transplacental approach, but with different effects regarding survival of 0, 1, or 2 twins. A scoring chart was subsequently constructed together with a nomogram for both a preoperative and immediate post-operative prognostic assessment. CONCLUSION: Part of the prognosis can be anticipated by perioperative findings. Although further validation is required, the presented nomogram should help unify the prognostic assessment in TTTS.

Assessment of fetal Sylvian fissure operculization between 22 and 32 weeks: a subjective approach.

OBJECTIVE: Sylvian fissure operculization (SFO) is a dynamic process throughout gestation and is a reliable feature of fetal cortex gyration that is amenable to prenatal ultrasound examination. This study aimed to define a subjective and reproducible method for SFO assessment. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of the sonographic anatomy of SFO conducted over a 9-month period in 200 fetuses with normal anatomical ultrasound examination at 22-32 weeks of gestation. We used a standardized view in an axial cerebral plane. SFO was scored according to a pre-defined scoring sheet based on the degree of overriding of the insula by the temporal lobe across gestational age. Because of the nested nature of the dataset, linear mixed effects models were used for concurrent assessment of inter- and intraobserver agreement of this scoring method. Subject-specific variance of the score was derived for each week of gestation from the whole repeated-measures dataset and the 5(th) and 95(th) percentiles of the score (mean score(week) +/- 1.645 SD(subject, week)) were determined. RESULTS: The inter- and intraobserver agreement correlation coefficients were 0.91 (0.89-1.00) and 0.95 (0.93-1.00), respectively, with a standard error of measurement < 1 scoring unit, which corresponds to an accuracy of within 1 week. A reference chart was fitted, showing the increase of the SFO score between 22 and 32 weeks, along with age-specific 5(th) and 95(th) percentiles. CONCLUSION: A simple scoring evaluation of the SFO is a reliable method for its assessment at between 22 and 32 weeks of gestation.