Multi-institution assessment of the use and risk of cardiovascular computed tomography in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac computed tomography (CT) is increasingly used in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). Variability of practice and of comprehensive diagnostic risk across institutions is not known. METHODS: Four centers prospectively enrolled consecutive pediatric CHD patients <18 years of age undergoing cardiac CT from January 6, 2017 to 1/30/2020. Patient characteristics, cardiac CT data and comprehensive diagnostic risk were compared by age and institutions. Risk categories included sedation and anesthesia use, vascular access, contrast exposure, cardiovascular medication, adverse events (AEs), and estimated radiation dose. RESULTS: Cardiac CT was performed in 1045 pediatric patients at a median (interquartile range, IQR) age of 1.7 years (0.3, 11.0). The most common indications were arterial abnormalities, suspected coronary artery anomalies, functionally single ventricle heart disease, and tetralogy of Fallot/pulmonary atresia. Sedation was used in 8% and anesthesia in 11% of patients. Peripheral vascular access was utilized for 93%. Median contrast volume was 2 â€‹ml/kg. Beta blockers were administered in 11% of cases and nitroglycerin in 2% of cases. The median (IQR) total procedural dose length product (DLP) was 20 â€‹mGy∗cm (10, 50). Sedation, vascular access, contrast exposure, use of cardiovascular medications and radiation dose estimates varied significantly by institution and age (p â€‹< â€‹0.001). Seven minor adverse events (0.7%) and no major adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Cardiac CT for CHD is safe in pediatric patients when appropriate CT technology and expertise are available. Scans can be acquired at relatively low radiation exposure with few minor adverse events.

Long-Term (3 Years) Outcomes of Ranolazine Therapy for Refractory Angina Pectoris (from the Ranolazine Refractory Registry).

Ranolazine is approved for patients with chronic stable angina but has not been formally studied in patients with refractory angina pectoris (RAP). Patients with RAP have limited therapeutic options and significant limitations in their quality of life. The Ranolazine Refractory Angina Registry was designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of ranolazine in RAP patients in order to expand treatment options for this challenging patient population. Using an extensive prospective database, we enrolled 158 consecutive patients evaluated in a dedicated RAP clinic. Angina class, medications, major adverse cardiac events including death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization were obtained at 12, 24, and 36 months. At 3 years, 95 (60%) patients remained on ranolazine. A ≥2 class improvement in angina was seen in 48% (38 of 80 patients with known Canadian Cardiovascular Society class) of those who remained on ranolazine. Discontinuation due to side effects, ineffectiveness, cost, and progression of disease were the principle reasons for discontinuation, but primarily occurred within the first year. In conclusion, ranolazine is an effective antianginal therapy at 3-year follow-up in patients with RAP and may reduce cardiac readmission.