Variation in general practice referral rate to acute medicine services and association with hospital admission. A retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Variation in general practice (GP) referral rates to outpatient services is well described however variance in rates of referral to acute medical units is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To investigate variance in GP referral rate for acute medical assessment and subsequent need for hospital admission. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of acute medical referrals from 88 GPs in Lothian, Scotland between 2017 and 2020 was performed using practice population size, age, deprivation, care home residence, and distance from hospital as explanatory variables. Patient-level analysis of demography, deprivation, comorbidity, and acuity markers was subsequently performed on referred and clinically assessed acute medical patients (n = 42,424) to examine how practice referral behaviour reflects clinical need for inpatient hospital care. RESULTS: Variance in GP referral rates for acute medical assessment was high (2.53-fold variation 1st vs. 4th quartile) and incompletely explained by increasing age and deprivation (adjusted R2 0.67, P < 0.001) such that significant variance remained after correction for confounders (2.15-fold). Patients from the highest referring quartile were significantly less likely to require hospital admission than those from the third, second, or lowest referring quartiles (adjusted odds ratio 1.28 [1.21-1.36, P < 0.001]; 1.30 [1.23-1.37, P < 0.001]; 1.53 [1.42-1.65, P < 0.001]). CONCLUSIONS: High variation in GP practice referral rate for acute medical assessment is incompletely explained by practice population socioeconomic factors and negatively associates with need for urgent inpatient care. Identifying modifiable factors influencing referral rate may provide opportunities to facilitate community-based care and reduce congestion on acute unscheduled care pathways.

Managing the populations need for urgent medical care is challenge in many healthcare systems and overcrowding of urgent medical services negatively affects patient experience and can affect timely treatment. In the United Kingdom, the primary sources of patients attending for acute medical care are self-attendance to the hospital or by way of referral by a primary care physician (general practitioner). These data for the first time demonstrate high variation in referral rates for acute medical assessment between general practices which is incompletely explained by factors such as the age, deprivation, distance to the hospital or care home residence status of the care home population. Analysis of over 40,000 of these referrals for urgent medical care was subsequently undertaken to further investigate this variation. After adjusting for important clinical factors, patients referred from "high referring" practices were over 50% less likely to require inpatient hospital care than patients from lower referring practices. This suggests that the threshold for referral varies greatly between individual primary care clinicians, practices, or practice populations and many of these patients may have been suitable for less urgent community-based care. Identification of modifiable factors that account for this unexplained variation may facilitate community-based care and improve patient experience by reducing unnecessary attendance and congestion in already busy emergency care services.

A study of diabetic ketoacidosis in the pregnant population in the United Kingdom: Investigating the incidence, aetiology, management and outcomes.

AIM: To estimate the incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) among pregnant women, describe its clinical features, management and outcomes and identify the risk factors for the condition. METHODS: A national population-based case-control study was conducted in the UK using the UK Obstetric Surveillance System between April 2019 and September 2020 including all pregnant women with DKA irrespective of the level of blood glucose. The incidence rate of DKA in pregnancy was estimated. A case-control analysis limited to women with type 1 diabetes was performed comparing characteristics of women with DKA (cases) to those of women whose pregnancies were not complicated by DKA (controls). RESULTS: In all, 82 women were identified with DKA in pregnancy; 6.3 per 100,000 maternities (95% CI: 5.0-7.9). No maternal deaths occurred, but perinatal mortality was 12/73 (16%) with 11 stillbirths and one neonatal death. DKA episodes mostly occurred in women with type 1 diabetes (85%) and in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy (71%). Episodes were mainly precipitated by infection (21%), vomiting (21%), steroid therapy (13%) and medication errors (10%). Fifteen percent of women had more than one episode of DKA during their pregnancy. Risk factors associated with DKA among women with type 1 diabetes identified through the case-control analysis were the woman and/or partner not being in a paid employment and having at least one microvascular complication of diabetes before pregnancy. CONCLUSION: DKA in pregnancy was associated with high perinatal mortality and was linked with factors related to socio-economic deprivation, mental health problems and long-term difficulties with glycaemic control.

Medullary Thyroid Cancer Patient's Assessment of Quality of Life Tools: Results from the QaLM Study.

BACKGROUND: Medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) is a neuroendocrine tumour and a rare variant of thyroid cancer with different aetiology, presentation and treatment to differentiated thyroid cancer. Currently available thyroid cancer-specific quality of life (QoL) tools focus on issues and treatments more relevant to patients with differentiated thyroid cancer and therefore may not address issues specific to a MTC diagnosis and cancer journey. METHOD: This prospective multicentre randomised study involved 204 MTC patients completing four quality of life questionnaires (QOLQ) and stating their most and least preferred. The questionnaires were a general instrument, the EORTC QLQ-C30, two disease-specific tools, the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) thyroid module and the City of Hope Quality of Life Scale/THYROID (amended) and the neuroendocrine questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-GINET21. Patients were randomised to complete the four questionnaires in one of 24 possible orders and then answered questions about which tool they preferred. The primary outcome measure was patients' preferred QoL instrument for describing their concerns and for facilitating communication with their healthcare professional. Secondary analyses looked at differences between preferred QOLQs amongst patient subgroups (WHO performance status [0 and 1+], disease stage: early [T1-3, N0 or N1A], metastatic [T4, any T N1b] and advanced [any T any N M1], and type of MTC [sporadic and inherited]), identification of MTC patients' least preferred questionnaire and clinicians' views on the QoL tools in terms of their ability to highlight problems not otherwise ascertained by a standard clinical review. RESULTS: No evidence of a difference was observed for most preferred QOLQ (p = 0.650). There was however evidence of a difference in least preferred questionnaire in the cohort of 128 patients who stated their least preferred questionnaire (p = 0.042), with 36% (46/128) of patients choosing the EORTC QLQ-GI.NET21 questionnaire. Subgroup analyses showed that there was no evidence of a difference in patients' most preferred questionnaire in sporadic MTC patients (p = 0.637), patients with WHO PS 0 or 1+ (p = 0.844 and p = 0.423) nor when comparing patients with early, advanced local or metastatic disease (p = 0.132, p = 0.463 and p = 0.506, respectively). Similarly, subgroup analyses on patients' least preferred questionnaires showed no evidence of differences in sporadic MTC patients (p = 0.092), patients with WHO PS 0 or 1+ (p = 0.423 and p = 0.276), nor in early or metastatic disease patients (p = 0.682 and p = 0.345, respectively). There was however some evidence to suggest a difference in least preferred questionnaire in patients with advanced local stage disease (p = 0.059), with 43% (16/37) of these patients choosing the EORTC QLQ-GI.NET21 questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: MTC patients regardless of their performance status, disease aetiology and disease burden did not express a preference for any one particular questionnaire suggesting any of the tools studied could be utilized in this patient cohort. The least preferred questionnaire being a gastrointestinal NET specific tool suggests that diarrhoea was not a significant symptom and concern for the population studied.