Comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients suffering from infective endocarditis. A prospective multicentric cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to describe the impact of infective endocarditis (IE) on functional, cognitive and nutritional statuses, and to estimate the influence of these parameters on surgical management and mortality. METHOD: This was a prospective study over 13 months in 14 French hospitals, including patients ≥75 years of age with definite or possible IE. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) was performed during the first week of hospitalization, including a retrospective estimation of functional status 2 months before hospitalization, and 3 months after. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were included (mean age 83.1 ± 5.0 (75-101) years). IE was associated with a dramatic impairment of functional status between 2 months prior hospitalization and the first geriatric evaluation (90.8% able to walk vs. 35.5% (p < 0.0001), ADL (Activities in Daily Living) 5.0 ± 1.7 vs. 3.1 ± 2.1 (p < 0.0001)). The 19 operated patients (15.8%) had less comorbidities (cumulative illness rating scale geriatric 10.8 ± 8.2 vs. 15.3 ± 7.1 (p 0.0176)), better functional (ADL 5.9 ± 0.4 vs. 4.9 ± 1.8 (p 0.0171) and nutritional (mini nutritional assessment 20.4 ± 5.0 vs. 17.3 ± 6.2 (p 0.0501)) statuses than non-operated patients. Among all infectious, cardiac and geriatric parameters, body mass index (HR 0.9, range 0.8-1, p 0.05) and ADL at the time of the first evaluation (HR 0.7, range 0.6-0.9, p 0.002) were the sole independent predictors of the 3-month (32.5%) and 1-year mortality (42.5%). Three months later, the 57 assessed patients only partially recovered their ADL (3.7 ± 1.9 vs. 5.3 ± 1.4 2 months prior hospitalization and 4.6 ± 1.9 at the first CGA; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Functional and nutritional abilities are crucial components that can be accurately explored through a CGA when managing IE in oldest patients.

Pre-exposure rabies vaccination: strategies and cost-minimization study.

An alternative strategy for pre-exposure rabies vaccination to the institutional recommendations of the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is proposed based on recent long-term follow-up of post-vaccinal seroconversion rates. The alternative strategy uses the same primary series (i.e. vaccination in the deltoid area on D0, D7, and D28), but is completed by a scheduled booster vaccination at D365. The frequency of recommended subsequent booster injections depends on the serological test results obtained by a RFFIT on D379 and 3 years later. The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of the two pre-exposure strategies. A cost-minimization analysis was carried out to compare the two rabies pre-exposure vaccination and serological test strategies based on the data from two published studies on the long-term evolution of the immunity achieved using the different recommendations. For a theoretically equivalent immunogenicity, the cost of the alternative strategy ranged from 1.7 to 5.2 times lower than that of the institutional recommendations. A sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the results. The alternative strategy should be validated externally under field conditions. This approach would compare its real efficiency to the institutional recommendations.