The Cost of Ambulatory Breast Reduction: Hospital Reimbursement Versus Surgeon Payments.

Introduction: Reduction mammoplasty (RM) is one of the most common operations performed in plastic surgery. While US national surgical expenditures have risen in recent years, studies have reported decreasing reimbursement rates for plastic surgeons. The purpose of this study is to characterize the trends in charges and payments for a common plastic surgery operation, ambulatory RM, for facilities and physicians. Methods: A Medicare patient records database was used to capture hospital, surgeon, and anesthesiologist charges and payments for ambulatory RM from 2005 to 2014. Values were adjusted for inflation. A ratio of hospital to surgeon charges and payments were calculated: charge multiplier (CM) and payment multiplier (PM), respectively. Charges, payments, Charlson comorbidity index, CM, and PM values were analyzed for trends. Results: This study included 1001 patients. During the study period, the facility charge for RM per patient increased from $8477 to $11,102 (31% increase; p < .0005), and the surgeon charge increased from $7088 to $7199 (2% increase; p = .0009). Facility payments increased from $3661 to $3930 (7% increase; p < .0005), and surgeon payments decreased from $1178 to $1002 (15% decrease; p < .0005). CM increased from 1.2 to 1.54, and PM increased from 3.11 to 3.92. Conclusions: Charges and payments to facilities for ambulatory RM increased disproportionately to that of surgeons, likely due in part to rising administrative costs in health care delivery. This may disincentivize plastic surgeons from offering RM at hospital-based surgical centers, limiting patient access to this operation.

Introduction: La mammoplastie de réduction (MR) est l'une des interventions les plus courantes pratiquées en chirurgie plastique. Alors que les dépenses chirurgicales aux États-Unis ont augmenté au niveau national au cours des dernières années, les études ont signalé une diminution des taux de remboursement pour les chirurgiens plasticiens. L'objectif de cette étude est de définir les tendances dans les frais et paiements pour une intervention courante de chirurgie plastique, une MR ambulatoire, pour les établissements et pour les médecins. Méthodes: Une base de données des dossiers de patients Medicare a été utilisée pour collecter les frais pour les hôpitaux, les chirurgiens et les anesthésiologistes ainsi que les paiements pour MR ambulatoires de 2005 à 2014. Les valeurs ont été ajustées pour tenir compte de l'inflation. Des ratios des frais hôpital/chirurgien et des paiements ont été calculés : respectivement, un facteur de multiplication des frais (MF) et des paiements (MP). Les tendances de la valeur des frais, des paiements, de l'indice de comorbidité de Charlson, du MF et du MP ont été analysées. Résultats: Cette étude a inclus 1001 patients. Au cours de la période de l'étude, les frais pour MR par patient à la charge de l'établissement ont augmenté de 8 477 $ à 11 102 $, soit une augmentation de 31 % (P < 0,0005) et les frais du chirurgien sont passés de 7 088 $ à 7 199 $, soit une augmentation de 2 % (P = 0,0009). Les paiements de l'établissement ont augmenté de 3 661 $ à 3 930 $, soit une augmentation de 7 % (P < 0,0005) et les paiements du chirurgien ont diminué de 1 178 $ à 1 002 $, soit une diminution de 15 % (P < 0,0005). Le facteur MF est passé de 1,2 à 1,54 et le facteur MP est passé de 3,11 à 3,92. Conclusions: Les frais et paiements aux établissements pour MR ambulatoire ont augmenté de manière disproportionnée par rapport à ceux des chirurgiens, probablement en partie à cause de l'augmentation des coûts administratifs croissants de l'administration des soins. Cela pourrait inciter les chirurgiens plasticiens à ne plus offrir de MR dans les centres chirurgicaux hospitaliers et pourrait donc limiter l'accès des patients à cette opération.

Gender-Affirming Surgery Improves Mental Health Outcomes and Decreases Anti-Depressant Use in Patients with Gender Dysphoria.

BACKGROUND: Patients with gender dysphoria face significant health disparities and barriers to care. Transition-related care includes hormonal therapy, mental healthcare, and gender-affirming surgeries. Studies have described favorable surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction, however, the degree to which these procedures impact mental health conditions is not fully understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of gender-affirming plastic surgery on mental health and substance abuse in the transgender population. METHODS: A national insurance claims-based database was used for data collection. Patients with a diagnosis of gender dysphoria were propensity score-matched for the likelihood of undergoing gender-affirming surgery (no surgery being the control cohort), based on comorbidities, age, and sex. Primary outcomes included post-operative antidepressant use and the prevalence of mental health conditions. RESULTS: A total of 3,134 patients with gender dysphoria were included in each cohort. Patients in the surgery group had overall lower rates of mental health conditions, substance abuse, and SSRI/SNRI use. There was an absolute decrease of 8.8% in SSRI or SNRI prescription after gender-affirming plastic surgery (p<0.001), and significant decreases in post-operative depression (7.7%), anxiety (1.6%), suicidal ideation (5.2%) and attempts (2.3%), alcohol abuse (2.1%), and drug abuse (1.9%). CONCLUSION: Gender-affirming surgery in appropriately selected gender dysphoric patients is associated with decreased postoperative rates of SSRI or SNRI use and improved mental health.

Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Complex Lower Extremity Reconstruction: Outcomes and Costs for Biologically Based, Local Tissue Rearrangement, and Free Flap Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Various surgical techniques exist for lower extremity reconstruction, but limited high-quality data exist to inform treatment strategies. Using multi-institutional data and rigorous matching, the authors evaluated the effectiveness and cost of three common surgical reconstructive modalities. METHODS: All adult subjects with lower extremity wounds who received bilayer wound matrix, local tissue rearrangement, or free flap reconstruction were retrospectively reviewed (from 2010 to 2017). Cohorts' comorbidities and wound characteristics were balanced. Graft success at 180 days was the primary outcome; readmissions, reoperations, and costs were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Five hundred one subjects (166 matrix, 190 rearrangement, and 145 free flap patients) were evaluated. Matched subjects (n = 312; 104/group) were analyzed. Reconstruction success at 180 days for matrix, local tissue rearrangement, and free flaps was 69.2 percent, 91.3 percent, and 93.3 percent (p < 0.001), and total costs per subject were $34,877, $35,220, and $53,492 (p < 0.001), respectively. Median length of stay was at least 2 days longer for free flaps (p < 0.0001). Readmissions and reoperations were greater for free flaps. Local tissue rearrangement, if achievable, provided success at low cost. Free flaps were effective with large, traumatic wounds but at higher costs and longer length of stay. Matrices successfully treated older, obese patients without exposed bone. CONCLUSIONS: Lower extremity reconstruction can be performed effectively using multiple modalities with varying degrees of success and costs. Local tissue rearrangement and free flaps demonstrate success rates greater than 90 percent. Bilayer wound matrix-based reconstruction effectively treats a distinct patient population. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Indications for Plain Radiographs in Uncomplicated Lower Extremity Cellulitis.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Cellulitis is a common cause for emergency department (ED) presentation and subsequent hospital admission. Underlying fracture, osteomyelitis, or foreign body is often considered in the clinical evaluation of these patients. Accordingly, plain radiographs (XRs) of the affected extremity are often ordered during the initial work-up. The utility of these imaging studies in the treatment of uncomplicated lower-extremity cellulitis, however, remains unclear. In an effort to treat this common problem more efficiently, we evaluated our imaging practices and results in a cohort of consecutive patients admitted to a large public city hospital for treatment of uncomplicated lower-extremity cellulitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 288 consecutive ED admissions for treatment of uncomplicated cellulitis, of which 214 met the inclusion criteria for this study. Patient demographics, history, vitals, laboratory values, and test results were evaluated with univariate and multivariate statistical analyses. RESULTS: XRs of the affected lower extremity were obtained in 158 patients (73.8%). Positive XR findings were present in 19 patients (12.0%) and positively correlated with a history of acute trauma to the extremity (P < .001) or the presence of a chronic wound (P < .01). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed a history of trauma (P < .001) or the presence of a chronic wound (P < .05) to be independent predictors of positive XR findings with relative risks of 6.24 and 2.98, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of lower-extremity cellulitis has potential to significantly improve clinical efficiency and reduce cost by eliminating unnecessary testing. Based on our results, patients without a recent history of trauma to the affected extremity or the presence of a chronic wound do not appear to warrant XRs. When applied to our cohort, only 48 of 158 patients had a history of trauma or chronic wound. This means that 110 patients unnecessarily had plain films taken as part of their initial work-up. In a largely uninsured inner city patient population such as this cohort, that extra cost falls on the public hospital system.