Cost-effectiveness of bronchial thermoplasty for severe asthmatic patients in Japan.

Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is an interventional endoscopic treatment for severe bronchial asthma. Some studies have shown the clinical efficacy of this intervention, but its cost-effectiveness is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of BT. We collected data from the medical records of 16 Japanese patients who were treated with BT between February 2015 and April 2017, and compared asthma-related medical expenses between the year preceding and the year following BT. Four patients were Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) treatment step 4, and 12 were step 5. In 8 patients who had a successful response to BT, the annual asthma-related medical expenses decreased because of a reduction in hospitalization and emergency outpatient visits due to asthma attacks, and termination of the use of biologics. Most patients in the non-responder group had increased asthma-related medical costs postoperatively. The main reason for the increase in medical costs was the add-on treatment of biologics. BT was cost-effective in the responder group. If its effects continue for more than 10 years, BT will be a cost-effective treatment. Medical costs will be reduced if those who respond to BT can be identified prior to commencement of treatment.

Assessment of risks of pulmonary infection during 12 months following immunosuppressive treatment for active connective tissue diseases: a large-scale prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary infections (PI) are leading causes of death in patients with connective tissue diseases (CTD). The PREVENT study (Pulmonary infections in patients REceiving immunosuppressiVE treatmeNT for CTD) assessed risk of PI in patients with active CTD in the contemporary era of advanced immunosuppressive therapy. METHODS: In patients who started corticosteroids (n = 763), conventional immunosuppressants or biologics for active CTD were enrolled. Clinical and laboratory data, usage of drugs, and occurrence of PI were collected for 12 months. Baseline risk factors were investigated using Cox regression analysis. A nested case-control (NCC) study was performed with 1:2 matched case-control pairs to assess the risk for each drug category. RESULTS: During the observation period, 32 patients died (4.2%) and 66 patients were lost to followup (8.6%). Patients with PI (n = 61, 8%) had a significantly worse accumulated survival rate than patients without (p < 0.01). Cox hazard regression analysis using baseline data showed that these factors were significantly associated with PI: age ≥ 65 years (HR 3.87, 95% CI 2.22-6.74), ≥ 20 pack-years of smoking (2.63, 1.37-5.04), higher serum creatinine level (1.21, 1.05-1.41 per 1.0 mg/dl increase), and maximum prednisolone (PSL) dose during the first 2 weeks of treatment (2.81, 1.35-5.86 per 1.0 mg/kg/day increase). Logistic regression analysis by an NCC study revealed that maximum PSL dose within 14 days before PI (OR 4.82, 95% CI 1.36-17.01 per 1.0 mg/dl increase; 2.57, 1.28-5.16 if ≥ 0.5 mg/kg/day) was significantly associated with the events, while other immunosuppressants were not. CONCLUSION: Physicians should be aware of the higher risks for corticosteroids of PI than other immunosuppressants and assess these risk factors before immunosuppressive treatment, to prevent PI.

Clinical usefulness of a guideline-based screening tool for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis in asthmatics: the Self Assessment of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma questionnaire.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is common in asthmatic patients and may impair asthma control. However, this comorbidity is frequently missed. A simple test is needed to enable physicians to diagnose and evaluate the severity of both diseases. The Self Assessment of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma (SACRA) questionnaire, which GINA and ARIA Japan committees developed in 2011, consist of questionnaires based on GINA and ARIA guidelines for the diagnosis and severity of AR and asthma, and a visual analogue scale (VAS) to evaluate the severity of both diseases. Our objective was to investigate the clinical usefulness of SACRA as a patient-based screening tool for identifying asthmatic patients with AR. METHODS: SACRA, ACT (Asthma Control Test) and serum IgE RAST were performed in asthmatic patients. The correlation between SACRA and other parameters were analyzed. RESULTS: Four hundred twenty asthmatic patients were enrolled. Among 168 subjects who self-reported no concomitant AR, 76 asthmatics scored one or more symptoms on SACRA. Eventually, 32 of these 76 subjects were diagnosed with AR by physicians based on laboratory data or physical examinations by ear, nose and throat specialists. The sensitivity and specificity of SACRA for the diagnosis of AR were 92% and 66%, respectively. The estimated prevalence of AR among asthmatics was 66%, almost identical to that of the previous nationwide study in Japan. The level of asthma control assessed by the VAS on SACRA and the ACT score showed a strong correlation (r = -0.700, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SACRA may be a clinically useful tool for identifying bronchial asthma patients with AR.