An assessment of 2 objective measurements of web space position.

PURPOSE: To describe 2 simple objective clinical methods of measuring the web position between fingers and to determine their intra-observer and inter-observer reliabilities. METHODS: Two observers examined the second, third, and fourth web spaces on both hands of 30 adult healthy volunteers. The web index measured the web height as a relative ratio to constant anatomical landmarks on both fingers subtending the web. The dorsal web index took reference from the distance between the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints, whereas the palmar web index was measured in relation to the distance between the most proximal basal digital and proximal interphalangeal joint creases. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to determine intra-observer and inter-observer reliability. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficient values for intra-observer and inter-observer reliability were greater than 0.80, indicating excellent agreement. There was no statistically significant difference between the dorsal or palmar measurement methods in terms of reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The dorsal or palmar measurement method may be reliably used in healthy adults to establish a web index that describes the web position. The palmar method is considered easier to perform. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic III.

Problem of living liver donation in the absence of deceased liver transplantation program: Mansoura experience.

We report our experience with potential donors for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), which is the first report from an area where there is no legalized deceased donation program. This is a single center retrospective analysis of potential living donors (n = 1004) between May 2004 and December 2012. This report focuses on the analysis of causes, duration, cost, and various implications of donor exclusion (n = 792). Most of the transplant candidates (82.3%) had an experience with more than one excluded donor (median = 3). Some recipients travelled abroad for a deceased donor transplant (n = 12) and some died before finding a suitable donor (n = 14). The evaluation of an excluded donor is a time-consuming process (median = 3 d, range 1 d to 47 d). It is also a costly process with a median cost of approximately 70 USD (range 35 USD to 885 USD). From these results, living donor exclusion has negative implications on the patients and transplant program with ethical dilemmas and an economic impact. Many strategies are adopted by other centers to expand the donor pool; however, they are not all applicable in our locality. We conclude that an active legalized deceased donor transplantation program is necessary to overcome the shortage of available liver grafts in Egypt.