Examining Corneal Tissue Exportation Fee and Its Impact on Equitable Allocation.

METHODS: We conducted grounded theory semistructured interviews, purposively inviting participants until themed saturation was met. Sentiment analysis was used to determine opinion. RESULTS: We interviewed n = 92 global eye tissue and eye bank professionals. We determined that corneal tissue, which is exported, costs between US $100 and US $6000 or is provided as gratis. Collectively, interviewees indicated that, globally, there were no fixed fee structures in place, and the fee was influenced by multiple factors on both export and import sides. They indicated that ultimately corneas were allocated based on the importers' ability to pay the price determined by the exporting eye bank. DISCUSSION: Allocation of corneal tissue, which is exported, is influenced by the fees charged by the exporters to meet their bottom line and the funds available to importers. Therefore, export allocation is not equitable, with those who can pay a higher fee, prioritized. Steps to guide and support exporters with the development of fee structures that promote equitable allocation are essential. This will assist both export and import eye bank development, corneal tissue access development, and those awaiting a corneal transplant.

Prevalence of tear film hyperosmolarity in 1150 patients presenting for refractive surgery assessment.

PURPOSE: To present an analysis of tear film hyperosmolarity in a large, consecutive population and evaluate the correlation of ocular and systemic conditions with tear film osmolarity (TFO). SETTING: Private practice, Sydney, Australia. DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective, consecutive cohort. METHOD: Patients undergoing screening for laser refractive surgery from October 2017 to October 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. 1404 patients (n = 1357 standard, n = 47 postrefractive) undergoing screening for laser refractive surgery from October 2017 to October 2020 were reviewed. Routine examination included TFO and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire. TFO was conducted prior to further tests, and patients refrained from topical eyedrops minimum 2 hours before the appointment. RESULTS: 1404 patients (n = 1357 standards, n = 47 postrefractive) patients were reviewed. Mean highest TFO in the standard population was 299.12 ± 11.94 mOsm/L, with 82.3% of eyes <308 mOsm/L indicating normal tear film homeostasis. The mean intereye TFO difference was 8.17 ± 8.60 mOsm/L, with 65.2% of eyes ≤8 mOsm/L. Mean highest TFO in the postrefractive subgroup was 299.72 ± 11.00 mOsm/L, with a mean intereye difference of 9.02 ± 6.92 mOsm/L. Postrefractive surgery patients indicated higher mean OSDI values of 15.28 ± 14.46 compared with the remainder of the population 9.69 ± 10.56 (P = .012). Significant correlation was demonstrated between TFO scores and OSDI normal classification in the standard population only (P = .005, r = 0.077). The use of contact lens correlated inversely with TFO and OSDI scores (P = .000, r = -0.136, and P = .000, r = -0.152, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, this study represents the largest available cohort of TFO scores in a standard population presenting for refractive surgery. Although most patients were found to fall within normal ranges, a reasonable percentage were diagnosed with tear hyperosmolarity and therefore at risk for dry eye disease.

Do Eye Bank Models and Competitive Practice Affect International Cornea Allocation?

PURPOSE: International export and import of corneas is dependent on the stakeholders involved in the process and how those organizations engage to move corneas from one point to another. Our article presents the pathway of corneal donation from the export nation until its use in the import nation. It presents opinion on how aspects, such as competition and promotional behaviors, the use of online systems, and third-party engagement may influence allocation. METHODS: We interviewed n = 92 international eye tissue and eye bank (EB) professionals to garner their opinion. We used saturation and sentiment methods to extract and consolidate group opinion. RESULTS: Interviewees indicated that competition and promotional behaviors existed in some EB nations-although it was not universal. They indicated that the behavioral approach used by the individual EB, rather than the act of information sharing, influenced allocation. They also indicated that organizational models and allocation systems (eg, online ordering) and engagement with nonstate actors were important in allocation practice and decision making. CONCLUSION: We mapped the pathways for corneas involved in export and import from the point of recovery to their point of transplantation. Although generalist in nature and limited by the paucity of the existing literature, our article outlines that different business models, partnerships, and applied methods influence corneal export and import.

Determining the willingness of Australians to export their corneas on death.

BACKGROUND: 12.7 million people await a corneal transplant, but 53% are without access to corneal tissue. Sharing corneal tissue across nations can provide some access, however the willingness of export populations, like Australians, to export their donation on death, has never been evaluated. Our research samples the Australian population, determining their willingness to export. MATERIALS AND METHOD: We conducted e-surveys. N = 1044 Australians participated. The sample represented the Australian population, based on population demographics. Chi-Square and bivariate correlation coefficients examined associations between categorical variables, with a sample size of N = 1044, power of 0.80, and alpha of p = 0.05. Outcome measures were based on population sampling, by exploring willingness export, through the e-survey method. RESULTS: 38% (n = 397) of respondents said yes to exportation, 23.8% (n = 248) said no, and 38.2% (n = 399) were undecided. We found no relationship between willingness to export and general demographics, though those registered on the Donatelife Register (p = < .001), and those already willing to donate their eyes (p = < .001) were significantly more willing to export. DISCUSSION: More Australians are willing to export their corneas than not, though a significant portion remain undecided. The Donatelife Register, and donation awareness, are key components of respondent decision making. Therefore, the provision of information about exportation prior to, and at the point-of-donation, is essential for assisting Australian's to decide to export or not. Further examination and development of consent-for-export systems are necessary before routine exportation is undertaken.

Supply and Demand of Domestic Corneal Tissue and Its Implications on Export Potential-Using Australia as an Example.

PURPOSE: Corneal tissue importation is only possible if another country is able to export corneas without impacting its own domestic demand. Currently, there is little evidence to indicate whether export nations have such surplus capacity and in a position to export. To explore this concept, we examined our nation, Australia, which is reported to routinely decline donations because of its ability to meet domestic corneal transplant demand. Our research offers insights and opportunities for Australia and other nations to evaluate their domestic and international supply and allocation of corneal tissue in this space. METHOD: We collated 12 months of data on collected and noncollected donations, through participating Australian Eye Banks. The explanation of why some known donors were declined or not pursued indicated if demand was met and potential surplus-for-export levels. RESULTS: There were 7.5% (n = 11,889) of deaths in Australia that were notified to Australian Eye Banks during our reporting period. Of those, 9.3% (n = 1106/11,889) were recovered and allocated, 15.7% (n = 1863/11,889) were known but declined, and 75% (n = 8920/11,889) were not pursued. Of those that were declined, 64.3% (n = 1197/1863) were declined because of limitations with service/manpower at the eye bank, whereas 35.7% (n = 666/1863) were declined because demand was met. CONCLUSIONS: Australia did not meet demand all the time, during our data period. There were adequate quantities of potential donors to support increasing recovery for domestic allocation and provide for exportation without hindrance to Australian demand. Further examination of domestic supply and demand cycles and the export process is required before routine exportation.

Should Donors Consent to Export Their Corneas? Examination of Eye Tissue and Eye Care Sector Opinion.

PURPOSE: Corneal tissue international activity is only possible because of the willingness of export populations to donate their corneas on their death. Current predonation public education campaigns and at-the-point-of-donation consent practice generally includes consent for transplantation, research, and/or training. It is unclear whether a consent-for-export step is universally included in the consent process or, indeed, whether it should. We interviewed eye tissue and eye care professionals from around the world, who exported, imported, or did neither to understand current consent-for-export awareness and determine opinion on future practice. METHOD: During wider qualitative grounded-theory semistructured interviews with sector experts, to determine whether Australia should export, we captured sector opinion on consent-for-export. We used saturation and sentiment methods to determine opinion and χ2 correlation coefficients to examine association, using an α of P = 0.05. RESULTS: We interviewed 92 individuals, 83 of whom discussed consent-for-export. Of those, 51% (42/83) demonstrated some awareness of the practice; however, there were contradictions between interviewees from the same location. Regardless of current awareness, 57% (41/72) believed donors should be informed or consented for export. Their approval did not extend to donor-directed decisions, which would allow donors to decide which nation their donation should be sent, with 62.5% (45/72) opposing that notion. CONCLUSIONS: Our research indicates that the consent-for-export practice is not universally applied by exporting nations and that eye tissue and eye care professionals have limited awareness of the practice. Universally implementing a consent-for-export step within general consent practice would improve awareness, reduce confusion, and support donor wishes.

Should Nations With Surplus Donated Corneal Tissue Export to Those Without? A Review of Sector Opinion Through the Example of One Nation-Australia.

PURPOSE: There is a global demand for corneal tissue (CT) for transplantation, with some nations potentially able to export donations to those nations without. Unfortunately, there remains a global paucity of information that explains the process of exportation and importation (transnational activity), supports or defines practice, or informs those seeking to engage. Without knowledge, inclusive of the pros and cons, participating nations and decision makers are unable to make effective and informed decisions. METHODS: Through the example of our own nation, Australia, which may be entering a surplus-to-domestic demand phase and able to export, we conducted qualitative grounded-theory semistructured interviews with sector experts. Our approach ascertained whether Australia should export and under what arrangements. Through saturation and sentiment methods, we capture for the first time, global opinion on CT transnational activity (although primarily exportation), key themes, and finally determine whether Australia should engage. RESULTS: Eighty-four (91%) of 92 participants directly commented on our question "should Australia export corneal tissue?" Of 84, n = 67 (80%) stated yes, n = 17 (20%) indicated mixed opinions. No participant categorically stated that there should be no export. CONCLUSIONS: Eye tissue and eye care experts whom we interviewed, supported the concept of Australia exporting CT; however, they advise several safeguards to protect both import and export nations. Principally, they recommended practice be transparent with donors, nationally coordinated, part of a wider humanitarian program, nonprofit, short term for the importing nations as they move toward self-sufficiency and that Australia must define and confirm domestic need and ensure that demand is met before routine exportation.

Assessment of corneal curvature using verion optical imaging system: a comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Keratometry is a critical determinant of the postoperative refractive outcome. This study evaluates the comparability of keratometry measurements obtained using the Verion Optical Imaging System with devices used in current clinical practice. Further, it determines the interobserver reliability of the Verion Optical Imaging System. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of patient data PARTICIPANTS: Keratometric data was obtained from 100 patients presenting for pre-operative evaluation. Furthermore, repeatability and reproducibility were assessed using 15 healthy volunteers. METHODS: Corneal curvature values acquired by the Verion Optical Imaging System were compared with existing keratometry devices including autokeratometry, partial coherence interferometry (IOLMaster) and Scheimpflug corneal topography (Pentacam). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Direct comparison of corneal power, cylinder, axis of astigmatism and vector analysis were performed using correlation and Bland-Altman analyses. Reproducibility and reliability of the device were assessed using within-subject standard deviation and intraclass correlation coefficients for experienced and inexperienced technicians. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between Verion values and those obtained by other methods in relation to mean keratometry, corneal astigmatism, steep meridian and vector analyses (P > 0.05). Bland-Altman plots showed narrow limits of agreement for keratometry and astigmatism and wider agreement for steep meridian. Intraoperator reliability for both experienced and inexperienced operators and interoperator reproducibility showed no statistically significant differences between values. CONCLUSION: Measurements show no significant difference from those obtained by the other devices. This suggests the Verion system is en par with instruments used in current clinical practice. The Verion Optical Imaging System produces repeatable data with no difference related to operator experience.