The Clinical Utility of a Tiered Approach to Pediatric Glioma Molecular Characterization for Resource-Limited Settings.

PURPOSE: Molecular characterization is key to optimally diagnose and manage cancer. The complexity and cost of routine genomic analysis have unfortunately limited its use and denied many patients access to precision medicine. A possible solution is to rationalize use-creating a tiered approach to testing which uses inexpensive techniques for most patients and limits expensive testing to patients with the highest needs. Here, we tested the utility of this approach to molecularly characterize pediatric glioma in a cost- and time-sensitive manner. METHODS: We used a tiered testing pipeline of immunohistochemistry (IHC), customized fusion panels or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and targeted RNA sequencing in pediatric gliomas. Two distinct diagnostic algorithms were used for low- and high-grade gliomas (LGGs and HGGs). The percentage of driver alterations identified, associated testing costs, and turnaround time (TAT) are reported. RESULTS: The tiered approach successfully characterized 96% (95 of 99) of gliomas. For 82 LGGs, IHC, targeted fusion panel or FISH, and targeted RNA sequencing solved 35% (29 of 82), 29% (24 of 82), and 30% (25 of 82) of cases, respectively. A total of 64% (53 of 82) of samples were characterized without targeted RNA sequencing. Of 17 HGG samples, 13 were characterized by IHC and four were characterized by targeted RNA sequencing. The average cost per sample was more affordable when using the tiered approach as compared with up-front targeted RNA sequencing in LGG ($405 US dollars [USD] v $745 USD) and HGGs ($282 USD v $745 USD). The average TAT per sample was also shorter using the tiered approach (10 days for LGG, 5 days for HGG v 14 days for targeted RNA sequencing). CONCLUSION: Our tiered approach molecularly characterized 96% of samples in a cost- and time-sensitive manner. Such an approach may be feasible in neuro-oncology centers worldwide, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Clinical and economic impact of molecular testing for BRAF fusion in pediatric low-grade Glioma.

BACKGROUND: Treatment personalization via tumor molecular testing holds promise for improving outcomes for patients with pediatric low-grade glioma (PLGG). We evaluate the health economic impact of employing tumor molecular testing to guide treatment for patients diagnosed with PLGG, particularly the avoidance of radiation therapy (RT) for patients with BRAF-fusion. METHODS: We performed a model-based cost-utility analysis comparing two strategies: molecular testing to determine BRAF fusion status at diagnosis against no molecular testing. We developed a microsimulation to model the lifetime health and cost outcomes (in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and 2018 CAD, respectively) for a simulated cohort of 100,000 patients newly diagnosed with PLGG after their initial surgery. RESULTS: The life expectancy after diagnosis for individuals who did not receive molecular testing was 39.01 (95% Confidence Intervals (CI): 32.94;44.38) years and 40.08 (95% CI: 33.19;45.76) years for those who received testing. Our findings indicate that patients who received molecular testing at diagnosis experienced a 0.38 (95% CI: 0.08;0.77) gain in QALYs and $1384 (95% CI: $-3486; $1204) reduction in costs over their lifetime. Cost and QALY benefits were driven primarily by the avoidance of long-term adverse events (stroke, secondary neoplasms) associated with unnecessary use of radiation. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of molecular testing in guiding the decision to provide RT in PLGG. While our results do not consider the impact of targeted therapies, this work is an example of the value of simulation modeling in assessing the long-term costs and benefits of precision oncology interventions for childhood cancer, which can aid decision-making about health system reimbursement.

Survival and functional outcomes of molecularly defined childhood posterior fossa ependymoma: Cure at a cost.

BACKGROUND: Posterior fossa ependymoma (PFE) comprises 2 groups, PF group A (PFA) and PF group B (PFB), with stark differences in outcome. However, to the authors' knowledge, the long-term outcomes of PFA ependymoma have not been described fully. The objective of the current study was to identify predictors of survival and neurocognitive outcome in a large consecutive cohort of subgrouped patients with PFE over 30 years. METHODS: Demographic, survival, and neurocognitive data were collected from consecutive patients diagnosed with PFE from 1985 through 2014 at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Subgroup was assigned using genome-wide methylation array and/or immunoreactivity to histone H3 K27 trimethylation (H3K27me3). RESULTS: A total of 72 PFE cases were identified, 89% of which were PFA. There were no disease recurrences noted among patients with PFB. The 10-year progression-free survival rate for all patients with PFA was poor at 37.1% (95% confidence interval, 25.9%-53.1%). Analysis of consecutive 10-year epochs revealed significant improvements in progression-free survival and/or overall survival over time. This pertains to the increase in the rate of gross (macroscopic) total resection from 35% to 77% and the use of upfront radiotherapy increasing from 65% to 96% over the observed period and confirmed in a multivariable model. Using a mixed linear model, analysis of longitudinal neuropsychological outcomes restricted to patients with PFA who were treated with focal irradiation demonstrated significant continuous declines in the full-scale intelligence quotient over time with upfront conformal radiotherapy, even when correcting for hydrocephalus, number of surgeries, and age at diagnosis (-1.33 ± 0.42 points/year; P = .0042). CONCLUSIONS: Data from a molecularly informed large cohort of patients with PFE clearly indicate improved survival over time, related to more aggressive surgery and upfront radiotherapy. However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, the current study is the first, in a subgrouped cohort, to demonstrate that this approach results in reduced neurocognitive outcomes over time.

Volumetric assessment of tumor size changes in pediatric low-grade gliomas: feasibility and comparison with linear measurements.

PURPOSE: We report a retrospective comparison between bi-dimensional RANO criteria and manual volumetric segmentation (MVS) in pediatric low-grade gliomas. METHODS: MRI FLAIR or T1 post contrast images were used for assessment of tumor response. Seventy patients were included in this single center study, for each patient two scans were assessed ("time 0" and "end of therapy") and response to therapy was evaluated for both methods. Inter-reader variability and average time for volumetric assessment were also calculated. RESULTS: Fourteen (20%) of the 70 patients had discordant results in terms of response assessment between the bi-dimensional measurements and MVS. All volumetric response assessments were in keeping with the subjective analysis of tumor (radiology report). Of the 14 patients, 6 had stable disease (SD) on MVS and progressive disease (PD) on 2D assessment, 5 patients had SD on MVS and partial response (PR) on 2D assessment, 2 patients had PD on MVS and SD on 2D assessment, and 1 patient had PR on MVS and SD on 2D analysis. The number of discordant results rises to 21(30%) if minor response is integrated in the response assessment. MVS was relatively fast and showed high inter-reader concordance. CONCLUSION: Our analysis shows that therapeutic response classification may change in a significant number of children by performing a volumetric tumor assessment. Furthermore, MVS is not particularly time consuming and has very good inter-reader concordance.