RESUMO
This study evaluated the bone regeneration process in rabbit calvaria induced by three types of biomaterials: two xenogenous, consisting of deproteinized bovine bone, while the other was alloplastic, based on biphasic calcium phosphate. Five New Zealand white rabbits weighing between 2,900 and 3,500 g were submitted to four standard 8 mm-diameter perforations at the parietal bone. Three perforations were filled with three grafts and biomaterials, two of them received bovine Bio-Oss® and Endobon® Xenograft Granules, and the other consisted of fully alloplastic Straumann® Bone Ceramic. The fourth remaining cavity was used as control with coagulum. After eight weeks, the animals were sacrificed, and the samples were prepared for morphometric and qualitative analysis. The cavities filled with alloplastic biomaterials showed higher percentages of newly formed bone (p<0.05), while the cavities with xenogenous biomaterials showed higher amount of residual graft (p<0.05). Although the results showed greater bone formation with Straumann® Bone Ceramic, further studies are required to prove which is the more effective biomaterial for bone induction process.
Assuntos
Materiais Biocompatíveis/uso terapêutico , Regeneração Óssea/fisiologia , Substitutos Ósseos/uso terapêutico , Animais , Doenças Ósseas/patologia , Doenças Ósseas/cirurgia , Matriz Óssea/transplante , Transplante Ósseo/métodos , Bovinos , Cerâmica , Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico/métodos , Xenoenxertos/transplante , Hidroxiapatitas/uso terapêutico , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Imageamento Tridimensional/métodos , Masculino , Minerais/uso terapêutico , Osteogênese/fisiologia , Osso Parietal/patologia , Osso Parietal/cirurgia , Coelhos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
This study evaluated the bone regeneration process in rabbit calvaria induced by three types of biomaterials: two xenogenous, consisting of deproteinized bovine bone, while the other was alloplastic, based on biphasic calcium phosphate. Five New Zealand white rabbits weighing between 2,900 and 3,500 g were submitted to four standard 8 mm-diameter perforations at the parietal bone. Three perforations were filled with three grafts and biomaterials, two of them received bovine Bio-Oss(r) and Endobon(r) Xenograft Granules, and the other consisted of fully alloplastic Straumann(r) Bone Ceramic. The fourth remaining cavity was used as control with coagulum. After eight weeks, the animals were sacrificed, and the samples were prepared for morphometric and qualitative analysis. The cavities filled with alloplastic biomaterials showed higher percentages of newly formed bone (p<0.05), while the cavities with xenogenous biomaterials showed higher amount of residual graft (p<0.05). Although the results showed greater bone formation with Straumann(r) Bone Ceramic, further studies are required to prove which is the more effective biomaterial for bone induction process.
Este estudo avaliou o processo de reparação óssea induzida por três biomateriais, dois de origem xenógena constituído de osso bovino desproteinizado e um aloplástico à base de fosfato de cálcio bifásico, em calota craniana de coelhos. Em cinco coelhos brancos da Nova Zelândia com peso entre 2.900 e 3.500 g, foram realizadas quatro perfurações padronizadas de 8 mm de diâmetro nos ossos parietais e enxertados dois biomateriais de origem bovina: Bio-Oss(r) e Endobon(r) Xenograft Granules e um totalmente aloplástico: Straumann(r)Bone Ceramic. Uma cavidade permaneceu com coágulo e foi utilizado como controle. Após oito semanas os animais foram sacrificados e as amostras preparadas para análise morfométrica e qualitativa. Os resultados mostraram que as cavidades preenchidas com o biomaterial aloplástico apresentaram percentualmente maior quantidade de osso neoformado (p<0,05). Apesar dos resultados mostrarem maior neoformação óssea pelo Straumann(r)Bone Ceramic, há a necessidade de mais estudos para se comprovar qual biomaterial é mais efetivo no processo de indução óssea.