Costs and health care resource utilization among Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common type of leukemia. However, published studies of CLL have either only focused on costs among individuals diagnosed with CLL without a non-CLL comparator group or focused on costs associated with specific CLL treatments. An examination of utilization and costs across different care settings provides a holistic view of utilization associated with CLL. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the health care costs and resource utilization types attributable to CLL among Medicare beneficiaries and identify predictors associated with each of the economic outcomes among beneficiaries diagnosed with CLL. METHODS: This retrospective study used a random 20% sample of the Medicare Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse (CCW) database covering the 2017-2019 period. The study population consisted of individuals with and without CLL. The CLL cohort and non-CLL cohort were matched using a 1:5 hard match based on baseline categorical variables. We characterized economic outcomes over 360 days across cost categories and places of services. We estimated average marginal effects using multivariable generalized linear regression models of total costs and across type of services. Total cost was compared between CLL and non-CLL cohorts using the matched sample. We used generalized linear models appropriate for the count or binary outcome to identify factors associated with various categories of health care resource utilization, such as inpatient admissions, emergency department (ED) visits, and oncologist/hematologist visits. RESULTS: A total of 2,736 beneficiaries in the CLL cohort and 13,571 beneficiaries in the non-CLL matched cohort were identified. Compared with the non-CLL cohort, the annual cost for the CLL cohort was higher (CLL vs non-CLL, mean [SD]: $22,781 [$37,592] vs $13,901 [$24,725]), mainly driven by health care provider costs ($6,535 vs $3,915) and Part D prescription drug costs ($5,916 vs $2,556). The main categories of health care resource utilization were physician evaluation/management visits, oncologist/hematologist visits, and laboratory services. Compared with beneficiaries aged 65-74 years, beneficiaries aged 85 years or older had lower use and cost in maintenance services (ie, oncologist visits, hospital outpatient costs, and prescription drug cost) but higher use and cost in acute services (ie, ED). Compared with residency in a metropolitan area, living in a nonmetropolitan area was associated with fewer physician visits but higher ED visits and hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: The cooccurrence of lower utilization of routine care services, along with higher utilization of acute care services among some individuals, has implications for patient burden and warrants further study.

Disparity in treatment patterns among Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: an analysis of patient and contextual factors.

This study characterizes the patterns and timing of CLL treatment and, to our knowledge, is the first to identify social vulnerability factors associated with CLL treatment receipt in the Medicare population. A total of 3508 Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with CLL from 2017 to 2019 were identified. We reported the proportion of individuals who received CLL treatment and the time until the first CLL treatment receipt after the first observed claim with a CLL diagnosis. Logistic regression and time-to-event models provided adjusted odds ratios and hazard ratios associated with baseline individual-level and county-level factors. Sixteen percent of individuals received CLL treatment, and the median follow-up time was 540 d. The median time to receipt of CLL treatment was 61 d. Older age and residence in a county ranked high in social vulnerability (as defined by minority status and language) were negatively associated with treatment receipt and time to treatment receipt.

Patient-Administered Biologic and Biosimilar Filgrastim May Offer More Affordable Options for Patients with Nonmyeloid Malignancies Receiving Chemotherapy in the United States: A Budget Impact Analysis from the Payer Perspective.

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) are often administered to reduce the incidence, severity, and duration of febrile neutropenia (FN) in chemotherapy patients. Tbo-filgrastim and filgrastim-sndz represent a follow-on biologic and a biosimilar version, respectively, of the short-acting G-CSF filgrastim with comparable efficacy and safety. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the budget impact of increasing use of patient-(home-) administered tbo-filgrastim and filgrastim-sndz from a U.S. payer perspective. METHODS: An interactive budget impact model was developed to estimate the changes in drug cost associated with projected increases in the market share of tbo-filgrastim from 5% to 10% and of filgrastim-sndz from 10% to 12% (with a corresponding decrease in filgrastim market share from 85% to 78%) for a 1 million-member health plan among patients with nonmyeloid malignancies receiving chemotherapy with a high risk of FN. Patient self-administration at home was assumed for 20% of patients receiving short-acting G-CSF treatment; all products were purchased through the patient's pharmacy benefit and were assumed to have tier 3 formulary status with a patient copay of $54 per prescription. Base-case data were derived from publicly available resources. The total plan budget impact was calculated using a 1-year time horizon, along with the differences in per member per month and per member per year (PMPY) costs between the current and future scenarios. RESULTS: The effective annual per-patient drug cost to the plan totaled between $16,961 and $27,199, depending on dosage and packaging, for tbo-filgrastim; between $16,216 and $26,015 for filgrastim-sndz; and between $19,134 and $30,663 for filgrastim. The estimated total annual plan cost associated with patient-administered short-acting G-CSFs was $53,298,217 (PMPY = $53.30) in the current scenario and $52,828,832 (PMPY = $52.82) in the future scenario. Cost savings totaled $469,385 (PMPY = $0.48). The model was most sensitive to changes in the percentage of patients self-administering G-CSF at home and to the wholesale acquisition cost for filgrastim. CONCLUSIONS: The effective annual plan per-patient drug costs for tbo-filgrastim and filgrastim-sndz were 11% and 15% lower than filgrastim, respectively. The present analysis estimated an annual U.S. health plan cost savings approaching $0.5 million following increases in market shares of approximately 5% for tbo-filgrastim and 2% for filgrastim-sndz. DISCLOSURES: This study was sponsored by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R & D, which participated in the study design, data interpretation and analysis, the writing of the report, and the decision to submit. Aventine Consulting received consulting fees from Teva Pharmaceuticals and developed the cost model and provided data analysis support. Trautman and James are employed by Aventine Consulting. Szabo and Tang are employed by Teva Pharmaceuticals.

Cost-effectiveness and budgetary impact of lipegfilgrastim for the reduction of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in Brazil / Custo-benefício e impacto orçamentário do lipegfilgrastim para a redução de neutropenia induzida por quimioterapia no Brasil

Background: Granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSFs) reduce the risk of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Lipegfilgrastim is a long-acting, once-per-cycle G-CSF, while Brazil's standard of care is short-acting filgrastim. A cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of lipegfilgrastim was conducted with filgrastim and once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim for adults at risk of neutropenia in Brazil. Methods: The decision model used national and clinical data to evaluate the costs and outcomes of each treatment. Costs included drug and medical expenses, outpatient and inpatient neutropenia treatments, and adverse events. Health outcomes included incidence of neutropenia-related events. For the budget impact analysis, health outcomes and costs for the pre/post-lipegfilgrastim scenarios were combined to identify expenditure with lipegfilgrastim's introduction. Results: Total cost per patient during a course of four chemotherapy cycles was estimated at R$12,920 for lipegfilgrastim, R$15,168 for filgrastim, and R$13,232 for pegfilgrastim. Based on better outcomes and lower total costs with lipegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim as well as pegfilgrastim, lipegfilgrastim was the dominant treatment strategy over both filgrastim and pegfilgrastim during the duration of chemotherapy treatment. Over 5 years, the uptake of lipegfilgrastim led to savings of R$61,532,403 in overall medical costs. Neutropenic events decreased by 17,141 and deaths linked to febrile neutropenia decreased by 239. Conclusion: Due to better outcomes and lower overall cost, lipegfilgrastim was a cost-saving strategy compared with filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in the Brazilian healthcare system. Furthermore, the budget impact analysis estimated a reduction in overall medical costs and improved health outcomes over 5 years following the introduction of lipegfilgrastim.

Introdução: Fatores estimuladores de colônias de granulócitos (G-CSFs) reduzem risco de neutropenia induzida por quimioterapia. Lipegfilgrastim é um G-CSF de longa ação, de "um por ciclo", enquanto o padrão de cuidado no Brasil é filgrastim de curta ação. Realizou-se uma análise de custo/ benefício e impacto orçamentário (IO) no Brasil do lipegfilgrastim um por ciclo com filgrastim e pegfilgrastim para adultos sob risco de neutropenia. Métodos: O modelo de decisão usou dados nacionais e clínicos para avaliar resultados e custos dos tratamentos que incluíam medicamentos, médicos, tratamentos ambulatoriais e hospitalares para a neutropenia, e eventos adversos. Resultados de saúde incluíam a incidência de eventos relacionados à neutropenia. Para a análise do IO, os custos e resultados de antes/depois do lipegfilgrastim foram combinados para identificar gastos com o lipegfilgrastim. Resultados: O custo total por paciente em quatro ciclos foi estimado em R$ 12.920 para lipegfilgrastim, R$ 15.168 para filgrastim e R$ 13.232 para pegfilgrastim. Com base em melhores resultados e custos totais menores, o lipegfilgrastim, comparado ao filgrastim e ao pegfilgrastim, representou a estratégia de tratamento predominante. Em 5 anos, o lipegfilgrastim gerou uma economia de R$ 61.532.403 em custos médicos gerais. Houve 17.141 menos eventos neutropênicos e as mortes relacionadas à neutropenia febril reduziram em 239. Conclusão: Devido a melhores resultados e menores custos, lipegfilgrastim, comparado ao filgrastim e ao pegfilgrastim, foi uma estratégia econômica no sistema brasileiro. A análise de IO estimou uma redução nos custos médicos e melhorou os resultados em 5 anos após a introdução do lipegfilgrastim.

Healthcare utilization and costs associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor switching in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.

Differences in healthcare utilization and costs were examined in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients experiencing first-, second- and third-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Three CML cohorts were identified from the Truven Health MarketScan® database: No-Switch Cohort (NSc) = did not switch from first-line; One-Switch Cohort (OSc) = switched from first- to second-line only; Two-Switch Cohort (TSc) = switched to second- and then third-line. A total of 3510 patients were identified (mean = 54%; age = 55.8 years). NSc comprised 81% of the sample, OSc comprised 15% and 4% were in the TSc. First-line utilization/costs were significantly higher in the OSc/TSc compared to the NSc. Second-line hospital/outpatient visits and costs were higher in TSc compared to OSc. TSc experienced a significant cost increase from first- to second-line ($4226.46), twice that of OSc ($2488.03). TKI switching is associated with a substantial increase in healthcare utilization and costs, particularly for patients who switch twice.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Treating Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Patients With Arsenic Trioxide and Retinoic Acid in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: This study estimated the cost-effectiveness of arsenic trioxide (ATO) added to all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) when used in first-line acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov cohort model was developed with 3 states: stable disease (during first- or second-line treatment), disease event, and death. Newly diagnosed patients with low- to intermediate-risk APL were included and each month could remain in their current health state or move to another. Treatment consisted of ATO + ATRA, ATRA + idarubicin (IDA), or ATRA + cytarabine (AraC) + additional chemotherapy. After an initial disease event, patients discontinued first-line therapy and switched to a second-line ATO regimen. Efficacy and safety data were obtained from published trials; quality of life/utility estimates were obtained from the literature; costs were obtained from US data sources. Costs and outcomes over time were used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Compared to ATRA + AraC + additional chemotherapy, ATRA + IDA treatment had ICERs of $2933 per life-year (LY) saved and $3122 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Compared to the ATRA + IDA regimen, first-line ATO + ATRA treatment had ICERs of $4512 per LY saved and $5614 per QALY gained. Results were sensitive to changes in pharmacy costs of the ATO + ATRA regimen during consolidation. CONCLUSION: The ATO + ATRA regimen is highly cost-effective compared to ATRA + AraC + additional chemotherapy or ATRA + IDA in the treatment of newly diagnosed low- to intermediate-risk APL patients.

The burden of caring for dementia patients: caregiver reports from a cross-sectional hospital-based study in China.

The impact of dementia care on caregivers' professional, personal, emotional and social well-being was measured in a cohort of 1,387 caregivers in seven regions across mainland China, using a Chinese version of the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) and four supplementary questions. Caregivers also estimated costs of care and medical resource utilization. Caregiver burden was generally low to moderate. Dementia care had the greatest impact on caregivers' professional lives, with 25.5% reporting a reduced work schedule in the past month. Lost work time was greater for caregivers of patients with previously diagnosed dementia than for those with newly diagnosed dementia. Average monthly out-of-pocket costs of dementia care exceeded national average monthly incomes of rural and urban residents. These findings highlight the obstacles facing the country with the fastest-growing elderly population in the world.

The impact of rheumatoid arthritis on the burden of disease in urban China.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to assess the burden of disease associated with the impact of rheumatoid arthritis in urban China. Burden of disease is considered from four perspectives: (i) health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL); (ii) health status; (iii) employment status; and (iv) absenteeism and presenteeism. METHODS: Data are from the 2009 National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS) of urban China. This is an internet-based survey and details the health experience of 13,007 respondents. The survey is representative of the urban China population at 18 years of age and over (18.1% of the total population). Of those responding to the survey, a total of 353 reported that they had been diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis--an unweighted estimate of 2.65%. The sample design allows a comparison of those reporting rheumatoid arthritis with those not reporting this disease and, hence, a quantitative assessment of the burden of disease. Estimates of the quantitative impact of the presence of rheumatoid arthritis are through a series of generalized linear regression models. HRQoL is evaluated through the SF-12 instrument together with responses to the first item of the SF-12, self-reported health status. The SF-12 instrument generates three measures of HRQoL: the physical component summary (PCS), the mental component summary (MCS) and SF-6D utilities. Health status is captured as a self-report on a 5-point scale. Employment status is considered in terms of self-reported labor force participation, while absenteeism and presenteeism are estimated from the Work Productivity Activity Index (WPAI). Apart from a binary variable capturing the presence or absence of rheumatoid arthritis, control variables were included to capture the impact of other potential determinants of HRQoL and health status. RESULTS: The presence of rheumatoid arthritis in urban China has a significant deficit impact on HRQoL as measured by the PCS and MCS components of the SF-12, SF-6D absolute utilities and on self-assessed health status. In the case of PCS, the deficit impact of rheumatoid arthritis is -2.289 (95%CI: -3.042 to -1.536); for MCS -1.472 (95%CI: -2.338 to -0.605) and for utilities -0.025 (95% CI: -0.036 to -0.014). In the case of health status the odds ratio for the presence of rheumatoid arthritis is 1.275 (95%CI 1.031-1.576). The presence of rheumatoid arthritis has a marked negative effect, just under 8%, on the likelihood of workforce participation. Finally, the presence of rheumatoid arthritis is associated with an increased likelihood of absenteeism and presenteeism. LIMITATIONS: The NHWS survey has a number of limitations. As the NHWS is an internet-based survey, biases may be present due to the lack of internet penetration in the urban China population. The extent to which individuals and households have internet access is unknown. In addition, the NHWS relies upon respondents reporting they have been diagnosed with one or more specific disease states. These are not, given the nature of the survey, clinically verified. This also introduces a degree of uncertainty. Care should be taken in uncritically generalizing these results to the wider China population. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of disease associated with self-reported, diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis in urban China is substantial. Utilizing a series of multivariate models, substantial deficits are associated not only in reported HRQoL and health status but also in respect of employment status and, for those in employment, rates of absenteeism and presenteeism.

Categorization of infliximab dose changes and healthcare utilization and expenditures for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in commercially insured and Medicare-eligible populations.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how changes in infliximab dose influence resource utilization and expenditures for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis using claims from January 1, 1999 through March 31, 2005 in the MedStat MarketScan databases for RA patients who had an increase, decrease, or no change in infliximab dose within 1 year of initiating therapy. Eligibility criteria included at least one claim with a diagnosis of RA and no biologic treatment within 6 months before the index infliximab claim, continuous health plan enrollment (commercial or Medicare) for 6 months before and 12 months after the index date, and three consecutive infliximab infusions. The index and final infliximab doses were estimated from claims data. RESULTS: Data were included for 1678 commercially insured patients and 616 Medicare-eligible patients; 45.4% and 39.3%, respectively, had an increase in dose, 24.7% and 43.2%, respectively, had a decrease in dose, and 29.9% and 17.5%, respectively, had no change in dose. Overall, resource utilization was higher in the increase-in-dose groups and lower in the no change-in-dose groups when compared with the decrease-in-dose groups for both cohorts. Medical costs were also highest for the increase-in-dose groups for both cohorts. Pharmacy expenditures for the no-change-in-dose groups were lower than the decrease-in-dose groups in both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: An increase in dose was the most common dose change for the commercial cohort, while a decrease in dose was the most common dose change for the Medicare-eligible cohort. Patients with an increase in dose had the highest utilization and expenditures while those with no change in dose had the lowest levels. The nature of this utilization needs to be examined to better understand how dosing changes may influence medical utilization. Changes in dose were defined by the difference between the first and final doses and may not have captured changes in interim doses.

Treatment persistence with adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab in combination with methotrexate and the effects on health care costs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) biologic agents are effective in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Information on patient persistence with biologic anti-TNF therapies is limited, and the effects of persistence on the costs of therapy are unknown. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to compare treatment persistence with adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab in combination withmethotrexate (MTX) and evaluate the effects of persistence on overall health care costs. METHODS: This retrospective study used data from the PharMetrics managed care administrative claims database. Data from patients with RA who received combination treatment with an anti-TNF agent plus MTX and had > or = 24 months of continuous plan eligibility were collected. The 3 anti-TNF cohorts were adalimumab + MTX (adalimumab group), etanercept + MTX (etanercept group), and infliximab + MTX (infliximab group). Treatment persistence was defined as the number of days between the first and last anti-TNF treatment and was reported as a percentage of the 1-year period after treatment initiation. Costs were compared between patients with treatment persistence rates > or = 80% or <80%. Demographics, comorbidities, disease severity, and RA-related costs were assessed using descriptive statistics. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to identify differences in mean persistence between the 3 cohorts. RESULTS: Data from 1242 patients were included (77.7% female; mean age, 50.0 years). The mean persistence rate in the overall population was 74.6%, and the mean treatment time was 272.3 days. The infliximab group had a higher persistence rate compared with the etanercept and adalimumab groups (78.0% vs 72.8% and 70.8%, respectively; P < 0.005). In all patients combined, those with treatment persistence > or = 80% had higher mean total health care costs compared with those with treatment persistence <80% ($19,271.52 vs $15,598.46; P < 0.001), largely due to higher pharmacy costs. However, nonpharmacy costs were lower in the > or = 80% persistence cohort ($3091 vs $4601; P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: In this population of patients with RA, overall treatment persistence was high, with patients treated with infliximab + MTX having significantly higher persistence compared with those treated with adalimumab + MTX or etanercept + MTX. While pharmacy costs were higher in patients with > or = 80% persistence, nonpharmacy costs were lower.

Effects of fistula on healthcare costs and utilization for patients with Crohn's disease treated in a managed care environment.

BACKGROUND: Fistulas are a common complication of Crohn's disease (CD) and are difficult to treat effectively. This study aimed to assess the effects of fistula on annual costs of healthcare and resource utilization for patients with CD. METHODS: A retrospective analysis, using the PharMetrics database, of patients with a diagnosis of CD from January 1, 2000 through June 30, 2005 was conducted. Using paid claim amounts, healthcare costs and resource utilization were compared for patients with and without fistula in the year following diagnosis. Further analysis compared costs for adult, pediatric, and older adult patients with and without fistula. RESULTS: This analysis included 13,454 patients with CD, of whom 12,683 (94.3%) had no diagnosis of fistula. The total median (range) cost per patient was higher for the fistula cohort ($10,863 [$0-$1,307,019]) than the nonfistula cohort ($6268 [$0-$1,181,485]), driven mainly by higher hospital and surgery costs. Median healthcare costs and resource utilization rates were generally higher for patients with fistula compared with those without fistula in all 3 age groups, with some of the largest differences observed in the pediatric cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Fistulas are often a difficult and costly complication of CD. This study determined that patients with fistulizing CD have higher healthcare costs and resource consumption than patients without fistula. Use of therapies that heal fistulas may help deter some of the high costs and intensive resource utilization found in this study. Economic analyses need to account for these issues when assessing the cost-effectiveness of therapies targeting fistulizing disease.

Administrative claims analysis of all-cause annual costs of care and resource utilization by age category for ulcerative colitis patients.

BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease with peak incidence in the third decade of life and a second peak in the sixth or seventh decade. While drug therapy can be used to control the inflammation and reduce symptoms, patients with UC may be treated surgically. There is little information in the published literature evaluating the all-cause health care costs of patients with UC according to age. OBJECTIVE: To assess from administrative claims the direct all-cause (not disease-related) costs of care and resource utilization for patients with UC compared with members without UC by 3 age categories. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the PharMetrics database of patients with a diagnosis of UC (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] code 556.x) from January 1, 2000, through June 30, 2005. This database contains enrollment data and pharmacy and medical claims from more than 85 different managed care organizations and more than 55 million patients in the United States. Patients had to be continuously enrolled for 6 months before and 12 months after the initial UC diagnosis and have at least 2 distinct claims with a diagnosis code for UC. The mean per-patient health care resource utilization and costs were calculated for patients in the year following their initial UC diagnosis and compared with the same measures for a group of age- and gender-matched members (without UC claims) at a ratio of 4:1. Three age groups were analyzed: pediatric-adolescent (aged < 18 years), adults (aged 18 to 64 years), and older adults (aged e 65 years). Differences in the measures of all-cause health care resource utilization (claims and costs) between the UC and non-UC groups were tested for statistical significance using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, a non-parametric alternative to the paired t test. Differences between the 3 age cohorts were tested using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Data were collected for 15,105 patients with UC and for 59,159 members in the comparator cohort without UC matched by age and gender. The average age for both cohorts was 44 years, and 54% were female. Mean ([SD], median) annual all-cause total health care costs in 2005 dollars for patients with UC were $13,233 ([$40,715], $5,190) versus $3,214 ([$12,741], $753) for the comparator group (P < 0.001). For all UC patients, all-cause inpatient hospitalization costs constituted the largest component ($5,771, 43.6%) of the mean annual total costs, followed by prescription medications ($2,423, 18.3%); miscellaneous services, such as hospice, psychiatric facility, and nursing home care ($2,092, 15.8%); outpatient hospital visits ($1,310, 9.9%); physician office visits ($899, 6.8%); laboratory procedures ($470, 3.6%); and emergency department visits ($268, 2.0%). Resource utilization (e.g., physician visits, laboratory claims, pharmacy claims) was highest for older adults aged e 65 years, followed by pediatricadolescent patients and adults aged 18 to 64 years (all comparisons P < 0.01). The mean ([SD], median) all-cause total health care costs were highest for pediatric-adolescent patients with UC (n = 589, 3.9%) at $23,113 ([$70,999], $6,214), followed by older adults (n = 650, 4.3%) at $15,811 ([$23,882], $6,886, P < 0.001), while adults aged 18 to 64 years (n = 13,866, 91.8%) incurred the lowest cost at $12,693 ([$39,505], $5,108, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with UC identified from medical claims incurred significantly higher all-cause health care costs for all 3 age categories than did the comparator group of health plan members without diagnosis for UC.

The cost-effectiveness of argatroban treatment in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: the effect of early versus delayed treatment.

A decision-tree analysis was used to estimate the average cost per patient using the direct thrombin inhibitor argatroban for early treatment (<48 hours after thrombocytopenia onset) compared with delayed treatment (> or =48 hours after thrombocytopenia onset) of immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) with or without thrombosis. Clinical probability data used to populate the model were obtained from argatroban clinical trials and from published clinical literature. Resource utilization data and cost data were also obtained from available literature, the 2003 Physician's Fee Reference, the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project 2000, the 2003 Drug Topics RedBook, and a modified Delphi panel. The total per-patient cost included hospital days, diagnostic tests, heparin, argatroban, major hemorrhagic events, and patient outcomes (ie, amputation, new thrombosis, stroke, or death), multiplied by the probability of each event. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated by dividing the incremental cost between patients with and without argatroban treatment by the incremental effectiveness, or the cost per new thrombosis event avoided. The mean cost per HIT patient without thrombosis who did not receive argatroban was $38,046. The mean cost decreased by 6.85% for patients who were treated earlier with argatroban therapy (average cost, $35,441), representing a $2605 saving per patient compared with those not treated with argatroban. For those receiving delayed argatroban therapy, the mean cost increased by $9024 per patient compared with those receiving early treatment with argatroban. The mean cost for HIT patients with thrombosis who did not receive argatroban was $48,101, which was 9.0% higher than for those receiving early argatroban therapy, representing a $3957 savings per patient. For HIT with thrombosis, mean costs increased by 18.2% in patients whose argatroban was delayed, representing a cost increase of $8020 per patient compared with early treatment (mean cost $44,144 for early treatment and $52,164 for delayed treatment). The results of this analysis support the recommendation to initiate early argatroban treatment upon suspicion of HIT to reduce the thrombotic consequences of HIT and associated healthcare costs. Argatroban therapy should not be delayed pending the results of HIT diagnostic tests.