Will "Hybrid" Meetings Replace Face-To-Face Meetings Post COVID-19 Era? Perceptions and Views From The Urological Community.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the preference and role of 'hybrid' urological meetings compared to face-to-face and online meetings during and after COVID-19 pandemic. The secondary outcome was finding out the most preferable webinar setting. METHODS: An online global survey was done between June 06 and July 05, 2020, using SurveyMonkey. The target participants were urology healthcare providers. The survey was disseminated via mailing lists and the Twitter platform. RESULTS: A total of 526 urology providers from 56 countries responded to the survey and it was completed by 73.3%. Participants' overall experience was better in a face-to-face meeting, followed by a hybrid and webinar only meeting. While opportunities for networking was identified as high in face-to-face meeting, online webinars were more cost effective, and learning opportunity and reach of audience was higher for hybrid meetings. For online webinar format, Zoom platform was used by 73% and majority (69%) saw it on their laptop or desktop. The preference was for a 1-hour webinar in the evenings with 3-5 speakers. Urology residents rated face-to-face meetings to have better cost-effectiveness when compared to consultants. Post COVID-19, more than half of all respondents would prefer hybrid meetings compared to the other formats. CONCLUSION: While there will be a place for face-to-face meetings, COVID-19 situation has led to a preference towards hybrid meetings which is ideal for a global reach in the future. It is plausible that most urological associations will move towards a hybrid model for their meetings.

Value of Urinary Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Levels on the Assessment of Botulinum Toxin Type A Treatment for Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity in Children with Myelodysplasia.

PURPOSE: Urinary cytokines are proposed to predict urodynamic findings and outcome of intradetrusor botulinum neurotoxin type A injection in children with myelodysplasia. The relationship between urinary brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurogenic and nonneurogenic detrusor overactivity has been shown as well. We prospectively investigated the effect of intradetrusor botulinum neurotoxin type A injection on urine brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in children with nonneurogenic detrusor overactivity due to myelodysplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urine samples of 23 children with nonneurogenic detrusor overactivity due to myelodysplasia were collected and analyzed before and 1 and 3 months after intradetrusor botulinum neurotoxin type A injection, and urodynamics were performed before and 6 weeks after injection. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels and urodynamic findings were analyzed and statistical comparisons were done. RESULTS: Mean ± SD age was 100.0 ± 34.5 months. Ratio of girls to boys was 2.8. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels significantly decreased (p <0.006), and maximum cystometric capacity and maximum detrusor pressure improved significantly following intradetrusor botulinum neurotoxin type A injection compared to preoperatively (p <0.001). No statistical correlations were determined between brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels and urodynamics. Of all analyses only bladder compliance 5 ml/cm H2O or less vs greater than 5 ml/cm H2O at postoperative urodynamics was associated with statistically increased urine brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels, suggesting that increased urine brain-derived neurotrophic factor predicts treatment failure. CONCLUSIONS: The present study does not suggest that urine brain-derived neurotrophic factor is a reliable followup marker in children with nonneurogenic detrusor overactivity due to myelodysplasia. However, this factor may have a role in treatment planning, which needs to be established in future large prospective studies.