Outpatient intravenous diuresis in a rural setting: safety, efficacy, and outcomes.

Purpose: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and outcomes of outpatient intravenous diuresis in a rural setting and compare it to urban outcomes. Methods: A single-center study was conducted on 60 patients (131 visits) at the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center (DHMC) from 1/2021-12/2022. Demographics, visit data, and outcomes were collected and compared to urban outpatient IV centers, and inpatient HF hospitalizations from DHMC FY21 and national means. Descriptive statistics, T-tests and chi-squares were used. Results: The mean age was 70 ± 13 years, 58% were male, and 83% were NYHA III-IV. Post-diuresis, 5% had mild-moderate hypokalemia, 16% had mild worsening of renal function, and 3% had severe worsening of renal function. No hospitalizations occurred due to adverse events. The mean infusion-visit urine output was 761 ± 521 ml, and post-visit weight loss was -3.9 ± 5.0 kg. No significant differences were observed between HFpEF and HFrEF groups. 30-day readmissions were similar to urban outpatient IV centers, DHMC FY21, and the national mean (23.3% vs. 23.5% vs. 22.2% vs. 22.6%, respectively; p = 0.949). 30-day mortality was similar to urban outpatient IV centers but lower than DHMC FY21 and the national means (1.7% vs. 2.5% vs. 12.3% vs. 10.7%, respectively; p < 0.001). At 60 days, 42% of patients had ≥1 clinic revisit, 41% had ≥1 infusion revisit, 33% were readmitted to the hospital, and two deaths occurred. The clinic avoided 21 hospitalizations, resulting in estimated cost savings of $426,111. Conclusion: OP IV diuresis appears safe and effective for rural HF patients, potentially decreasing mortality rates and healthcare expenses while mitigating rural-urban disparities.

A risk score for predicting atrial fibrillation in individuals with preclinical diastolic dysfunction: a retrospective study in a single large urban center in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction has been shown to associate with increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to examine the predictors of AF in individuals with preclinical diastolic dysfunction (PDD) - diastolic dysfunction without clinical heart failure - and develop a risk score in this population. METHODS: Patients underwent echocardiogram from December 2009 to December 2015 showing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% and grade 1 diastolic dysfunction, without clinical heart failure, valvular heart disease or AF were included. Outcome was defined as new onset AF. Cumulative probabilities were estimated and multivariable adjusted competing-risks regression analysis was performed to examine predictors of incident AF. A predictive score model was constructed. RESULTS: A total of 9591 PDD patients (mean age 66, 41% men) of racial/ethnical diversity were included in the study. During a median follow-up of 54 months, 455 (4.7%) patients developed AF. Independent predictors of AF included advanced age, male sex, race, hypertension, diabetes, and peripheral artery disease. A risk score including these factors showed a Wolber's concordance index of 0.65 (0.63-0.68, p <  0.001), suggesting a good discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed a set of predictors of AF in PDD patients. A simple risk score predicting AF in PDD was developed and internally validated. The scoring system could help clinical risk stratification, which may lead to prevention and early treatment strategies.

Regional Variation in Utilization, In-hospital Mortality, and Health-Care Resource Use of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in the United States.

We queried the National Inpatient Sample database from 2012 to 2014 to identify all patients aged ≥18 years undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in the United States. Regional differences in TAVI utilization, in-hospital mortality, and health-care resource use were analyzed. Of 41,025 TAVI procedures in the United States between 2012 and 2014, 10,390 were performed in the Northeast, 9,090 in the Midwest, 14,095 in the South, and 7,450 in the West. Overall, the number of TAVI implants per million adults increased from 24.8 in 2012 to 63.2 in 2014. The utilization of TAVI increased during the study period in all 4 geographic regions, with the number of implants per million adults being highest in the Northeast, followed by the Midwest, South, and West, respectively. Overall in-hospital mortality was 4.2%. Compared with the Northeast, risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality was higher in the Midwest (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.26 [1.07 to 1.48]) and the South (aOR 1.61 [1.40 to 1.85]) and similar in the West (aOR 1.00 [0.84 to 1.18]). Average length of stay was shorter in all other regions compared with the Northeast. Among patients surviving to discharge, disposition to a skilled nursing facility or home health care was most common in the Northeast, whereas home discharge was most common in the West. Average hospital costs were highest in the West. In conclusion, we observed significant regional differences in TAVI utilization, in-hospital mortality, and health-care resource use in the United States. The findings of our study may have important policy implications and should provide an impetus to understand the source of this regional variation.

Predictors of Cardiac Rehabilitation Initiation and Adherence in a Multiracial Urban Population.

BACKGROUND: Lack of initiation and adherence to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) remains a persistent problem. We sought to examine predictors of initiation, adherence, and completion of CR in a unique, minority predominant, urban population. METHODS: We included all patients who were first-time referred to the outpatient CR program at Montefiore Medical Center between 1997 and 2010. The indications for referral included acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, heart failure, stable angina, and valvular heart disease. Adherence was defined as attendance of at least 18 sessions of CR, and completion was defined as attendance of 36 sessions. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to examine the predictors of initiation, adherence, and completion of CR. RESULTS: A total of 590 patients were included (43.9% white and 56.1% nonwhite patients). Among 400 patients who initiated CR, 229 patients (57.3%) attended at least 18 sessions and 140 patients (35.0%) completed all sessions. Initiation of CR was less likely in patients who were nonwhite (OR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.44-0.97; P = .04) and those who lacked insurance (OR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.29-0.83; P = .04). Older age was associated with better adherence (OR = 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02-1.07; P < .001). Requirement of a copayment (OR = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.37-0.87; P = .01) was associated with poor adherence. CONCLUSION: In a multiracial population, nonwhite patients and those who did not have insurance were less likely to initiate CR. Younger age and requirement of copayment were independent predictors for poor adherence. Increasing medical insurance coverage and eliminating copayment may improve the participation and adherence of CR.

Non-invasive assessment of low risk acute chest pain in the emergency department: A comparative meta-analysis of prospective studies.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CCTA), stress echocardiography (SE) and radionuclide single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for the assessment of chest pain in emergency department (ED) setting. METHODS: A systematic review of Medline, Cochrane and Embase was undertaken for prospective clinical studies assessing the diagnostic efficacy of CCTA, SE or SPECT, as compared to intracoronary angiography (ICA) or the later presence of major adverse clinical outcomes (MACE), in patients presenting to the ED with chest pain. Standard approach and bivariate analysis were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies (15 CCTA, 9 SE, 13 SPECT) comprising a total of 7800 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria. The respective weighted mean sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and total diagnostic accuracy for CCTA were: 95%, 99%, 84%, 100% and 99%, for SE were: 84%, 94%, 73%, 96% and 96%, and for SPECT were: 85%, 86%, 57%, 95% and 88%. There was no significant difference between modalities in terms of NPV. Bivariate analysis revealed that CCTA had statistically greater sensitivity, specificity, PPV and overall diagnostic accuracy when compared to SE and SPECT. CONCLUSIONS: All three modalities, when employed by an experienced clinician, are highly accurate. Each has its own strengths and limitations making each well suited for different patient groups. CCTA has higher accuracy than SE and SPECT, but it has many drawbacks, most importantly its lack of physiologic data.

Cardiac imaging for assessment of left atrial appendage stasis and thrombosis.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most-common arrhythmia in the elderly population (age >65 years). The left atrial appendage (LAA) is the main location of thrombus formation, predominantly in patients with nonvalvular AF. This Review is focused on the pathophysiology, assessment, and clinical implications of stasis (or spontaneous echocardiographic contrast; SEC) and thrombus formation in the LAA. The gold-standard modality for assessment of SEC and thrombus in the LAA is echocardiography, particularly transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Cardiac CT (CCT) is an accurate, noninvasive alternative to TEE for the detection of LAA thrombi, distinctly when delayed-imaging acquisition protocols are used. Prospective studies to validate the use of cardiac MRI (CMR) for this purpose are needed, and will avoid the need for radiation and iodinated contrast. CCT or CMR could potentially be implemented to rule out LAA thrombus, avoiding unnecessary preprocedural TEE. Cardiac imaging is also of primary importance in the setting of LAA closure devices and electrophysiological studies. New trials are needed to compare the various imaging modalities, with surgicopathological findings as a reference standard.

Rationale and design of a randomized trial comparing initial stress echocardiography versus coronary CT angiography in low-to-intermediate risk emergency department patients with chest pain.

BACKGROUND: Comparative effectiveness research (CER) has become a major focus of cardiovascular disease investigation to optimize diagnosis and treatment paradigms and decrease healthcare expenditures. Acute chest pain is a highly prevalent reason for evaluation in the Emergency Department (ED) that results in hospital admission for many patients and excess expense. Improvement in noninvasive diagnostic algorithms can potentially reduce unnecessary admissions. OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of treadmill stress echocardiography (SE) and coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) in ED chest pain patients with low-to-intermediate risk of significant coronary artery disease. DESIGN: This is a single-center, randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing SE and CTA head-to-head as the initial noninvasive imaging modality. The primary outcome measured is the incidence of hospitalization. The study is powered to detect a reduction in admissions from 28% to 15% with a sample size of 400. Secondary outcomes include length of stay in the ED/hospital and estimated cost of care. Safety outcomes include subsequent visits to the ED and hospitalizations, as well as major adverse cardiovascular events at 30 days and 1 year. Patients who do not meet study criteria or do not consent for randomization are offered entry into an observational registry. CONCLUSIONS: This RCT will add to our understanding of the roles of different imaging modalities in triaging patients with suspected angina. It will increase the CER evidence base comparing SE and CTA and provide insight into potential benefits and limitations of appropriate use of treadmill SE in the ED.