Needs assessment for a decision support tool in oral cancer requiring major resection and reconstruction: a mixed-methods study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Advanced oral cancer and its ensuing treatment engenders significant morbidity and mortality. Patients are often elderly with significant comorbidities. Toxicities associated with surgical resection can be devastating and they are often highlighted by patients as impactful. Given the potential for suboptimal oncological and functional outcomes in this vulnerable patient population, promotion and performance of shared decision making (SDM) is crucial.Decision aids (DAs) are useful instruments for facilitating the SDM process by presenting patients with up-to-date evidence regarding risks, benefits and the possible postoperative course. Importantly, DAs also help elicit and clarify patient values and preferences. The use of DAs in cancer treatment has been shown to reduce decisional conflict and increase SDM. No DAs for oral cavity cancer have yet been developed.This study endeavours to answer the question: Is there a patient or surgeon driven need for development and implementation of a DA for adult patients considering major surgery for oral cancer? METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is the first step in a multiphase investigation of SDM during major head and neck surgery. It is a multi-institutional convergent parallel mixed-methods needs assessment study. Patients and surgeon dyads will be recruited to complete questionnaires related to their perception of the SDM process (nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire, SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc) and to take part in semistructured interviews. Patients will also complete questionnaires examining decisional self-efficacy (Ottawa Decision Self-Efficacy Scale) and decisional conflict (Decisional Conflict Scale). Questionnaires will be completed at time of recruitment and will be used to assess the current level of SDM, self-efficacy and conflict in this setting. Thematic analysis will be used to analyse transcripts of interviews. Quantitative and qualitative components of the study will be integrated through triangulation, with matrix developed to promote visualisation of the data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the research ethics boards of the Nova Scotia Health Authority (Halifax, Nova Scotia) and the University Health Network (Toronto, Ontario). Dissemination to clinicians will be through traditional approaches and creation of a head and neck cancer SDM website. Dissemination to patients will include a section within the website, patient advocacy groups and postings within clinical environments.

Prospective outcomes following drainless superficial parotidectomy with sternocleidomastoid flap reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing superficial parotidectomy for benign parotid lesions are at risk of postoperative complications, most notably cosmetic complications such as facial paralysis and contour defects, and functional complications including Frey's syndrome. Traditionally, surgical drains have been placed at the end of surgery to prevent hematoma and sialocele formation. However, this can increase the risk of postoperative complications and contribute to a prolonged course in hospital. To try and prevent these risks and complications, we introduced a novel technique of a drainless parotidectomy by reconstructing the resulting parotid bed defect with a superiorly based sternocleidomastoid (SCM) rotational flap and by placement of gelfoam into the wound bed and a facelift dressing postoperatively to provide additional hemostasis and avoid drain placement. METHODS: All patients with benign parotid disease undergoing a drainless superficial parotidectomy and reconstruction with a superiorly based SCM rotational flap at our center were identified within a prospective cohort database between July 2010-2018. Primary outcomes included postoperative cosmetic and functional outcomes, complications and length of hospital stay. A secondary cost analysis was done to compare this novel technique to traditional superficial parotidectomy with surgical drain placement. RESULTS: Fifty patients were identified within the database and were included in the final analysis. The average length of hospital stay was 1.02 days. All patients were satisfied with their aesthetic outcome at 1 year. During long term follow-up, 63% of patients reported normal appearance of the operated side. Seven patient's (14%) developed temporary facial paresis following surgery. All patients had resultant normal facial function at follow-up in 1 year. No patients developed subjective Frey's Syndrome. Two patients (4%) developed a postoperative sialocele requiring drainage and one patient (2%) developed a hematoma on extubation requiring evacuation and drain placement. Cost analysis demonstrated a cost savings of approximately $975 per person following surgery. CONCLUSION: In the current study, we introduced a novel approach of a drainless superficial parotidectomy using a superiorly based SCM flap, gelfoam and placement of a post-operative facelift dressing. This drainless approach was associated with good long-term cosmetic and functional outcomes with few postoperative complications. This new technique may also offer the potential for long-term savings to the health care system.

Intraoperative Primary Tumor Identification and Margin Assessment in Head and Neck Unknown Primary Tumors.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical management of the unknown primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (UP HNSCC) remains controversial due to challenging clinical diagnosis. This study compares positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) findings with intraoperative identification of primary tumors and compares intraoperative frozen-section margins to final histopathology. In addition, adjuvant therapy indications are provided. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic university hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients with UP HNSCC were included. Patients received PET-CT, followed by oropharyngeal transoral laser microsurgery (TLM). Margins were assessed intraoperatively using frozen sections and afterward by final histopathology. Adjuvant treatment was based on final histopathology. RESULTS: The sensitivity of localizing the primary tumor with PET-CT was 50.9% with a specificity of 82.5%. The primary tumor was found intraoperatively on frozen sections in 82% (n = 50) of patients. Five more tumors were identified on final histopathology, leading to a total of 90% (n = 55). Of the 50 intraoperatively found tumors, 98% (n = 49) had negative margins on frozen sections, and 90% (n = 45) were truly negative on final histopathology. Eighteen patients (29.5%) avoided adjuvant treatment. CONCLUSION: PET-CT localized the primary tumor in fewer than half the cases. This protocol identified 90% of primary tumors. Intraoperative frozen-section margin assessment has shown potential with a specificity of 92% compared to final histopathology. As a result, adjuvant therapy was avoided in almost one-third of our patients.

Head and Neck Surgical Oncology Choosing Wisely Campaign: imaging for patients with hoarseness, fine needle aspiration for neck mass, and ultrasound for odynophagia.

Choosing Wisely Canada, is a campaign designed to raise awareness regarding inappropriate or unnecessary tests and treatments. The Canadian Society of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery and the Canadian Association of Head and Neck Surgical Oncologists developed a Choosing Wisely Canada list to help promote high quality care for patients presenting with disorders of the head and neck: (1) Don't order imaging - computer tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - as the initial investigation for patients presenting with a chief complaint of hoarseness, (2) Don't perform an open biopsy or excision of a neck mass without having first considered a fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy and, (3) Don't order neck ultrasound to investigate odynophagia (discomfort or pain with swallowing) or globus sensation.

Transoral laser microsurgery versus radiation therapy for early glottic cancer in Canada: cost analysis.

OBJECTIVE: There is debate over whether radiation therapy or transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) is the superior treatment for early glottic cancer. Both offer similar cure rates and posttherapy quality of life. One factor that could decide the optimum therapy is cost. Several studies in Europe and the United States show that TLM is the most cost-effective treatment. The goal of this study was to conduct the first cost analysis in Canada on the treatment of early glottic cancer comparing radiation therapy and TLM. DESIGN AND METHODS: The study was conducted retrospectively. TLM and radiation therapy were broken down into individual components, and then the price for each component was summed. SETTING: The study was conducted at the Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Centre in Halifax, Nova Scotia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was total cost. RESULTS: It was found that radiation therapy was approximately four times more expensive than TLM. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that TLM should be the preferred treatment option for treating early glottic cancer in Canada as it is the most economical and has been shown in previous studies to be as effective as radiation therapy in both cure rates and quality of life.

Survival when treating adenoid cystic carcinoma of the external auditory canal: quantitative assessment of case reports.

BACKGROUND: Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the external auditory canal is a rare neoplastic condition. The purpose of this study was to conduct a quantitative review of case reports to assess the efficacy of treatment options and assess prognostic factors. METHODS: Cases were identified using PubMed. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to plot overall and disease-free survival. The log-rank test was used to compare survival curves in the univariate analysis for perineural invasion, margin status, and specific treatment modalities. A Cox proportional hazard model was used for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-six cases were identified. The univariate analysis suggests an increased overall (p = .03) and disease-free (p = .03) survival for those treated with parotidectomies, whereas temporal bone resection decreased survival (p = .07). There was no overall or disease-free survival advantage using radiation (p = .8). Positive margins decreased both overall (p = .05) and disease-free survival (p = .02). Perineural invasion was not significant. The multivariate analysis confirmed the findings for parotidectomies (p = .02) and temporal bone resections (p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Although the short-term survival for ACC is high, the risk of metastasis and poor long-term survival is high. In addition to local excision with negative margins, the surgeon should perform a parotidectomy.

Do we measure up? Is an objective measuring device necessary for the accurate assessment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal lesions?

OBJECTIVES: The T stage of oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer lesions has a significant impact on patient treatment and overall outcome. Determining the presence and size of palpable lymph nodes also plays an important role in the complex staging of oral cancer. Oral cavity lesions and lymph nodes are often assessed by visual approximation and palpation. The focus of this study was to determine if the introduction of a measurement tool (a ruler) changes the T stage of oral cavity and oropharyngeal lesions and the N stage of lymph nodes. MATERIALS/METHODS: Various pieces of felt that represented oral cavity and oropharyngeal lesions were placed on the tongues of cadaver specimens. Several pieces of felt of different shapes were used to represent each T stage in the oral cavity and oropharyngeal tumour staging system (American Joint Committee on Cancer). Pieces of round clay, of differing sizes, were also placed in the neck of one of the cadavers once a subplatysmal flap was raised. These pieces of clay represented the various node sizes. The study participants were four head and neck surgeons, four senior residents, four junior residents, and five medical students. All subjects were asked to visually inspect the oral cavity and oropharynx of the cadaver and approximate, to the nearest 0.5 cm, the size of the lesion. The subjects were then asked to identify the lymph nodes in the same manner. Once the participants had recorded their answers, they were asked to repeat the process with the aid of a ruler and measure the same lesions and lymph node to the nearest 0.5 cm. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: In staging of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer, the use of a ruler is necessary to increase the accuracy of tumour staging. There was a statistically significant difference in the estimated size of tumours and nodes when using a ruler. The average absolute error using visual estimation of the tumour size was 5.6 mm. When using the ruler, the error was reduced to 1.7 mm. The node size showed the same trend, with average absolute error on visual estimation being reduced from 7.4 mm to 5.2 mm.