Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Eur Respir J ; 25(6): 1001-10, 2005 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15929954

RESUMO

This is the first prospective clinical trial in which patients with acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis have been stratified by degree of underlying illness. Uncomplicated patients were randomised to levofloxacin 750 mg once daily (q.d.) for 3 days or azithromycin q.d. for 5 days. Complicated patients were randomised to levofloxacin 750 mg q.d. for 5 days or amoxicillin 875 mg/clavulanate 125 mg twice daily for 10 days. Regardless of therapy, complicated patients demonstrated lower clinical and microbiological success than uncomplicated patients. Clinical success for clinically evaluable patients was similar for levofloxacin and azithromycin (93.0 versus 90.1%, respectively), and levofloxacin and amoxicillin/clavulanate (79.2 versus 81.7%, respectively). For microbiologically evaluable patients, clinical response to levofloxacin for 3 days was superior to azithromycin for 5 days (96.3 versus 87.4%, respectively), and levofloxacin for 5 days was similar to amoxicillin/clavulanate for 10 days (81.4 versus 80.9%, respectively). Microbiological eradication was superior for levofloxacin for 3 days compared with azithromycin for 5 days (93.8 versus 82.8%, respectively), and similar for levofloxacin and amoxicillin/clavulanate for 10 days (81.4 versus 79.8%, respectively). In conclusion, levofloxacin 750 mg for 3 days was comparable to azithromycin for 5 days for uncomplicated patients with acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, while 5 days of 750 mg levofloxacin was comparable to 10 days of amoxicillin/clavulanate for complicated acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Bronquite Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Bronquite Crônica/microbiologia , Levofloxacino , Ofloxacino/administração & dosagem , Seleção de Pacientes , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Combinação Amoxicilina e Clavulanato de Potássio/administração & dosagem , Combinação Amoxicilina e Clavulanato de Potássio/efeitos adversos , Combinação Amoxicilina e Clavulanato de Potássio/economia , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/economia , Doença Crônica , Análise Custo-Benefício , Diarreia/induzido quimicamente , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Haemophilus influenzae/efeitos dos fármacos , Haemophilus influenzae/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Náusea/induzido quimicamente , Ofloxacino/efeitos adversos , Ofloxacino/economia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 18(6): 405-11, 1997 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9181396

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the costs and benefits of vaccinating varicella-susceptible healthcare workers at a university hospital with live, attenuated varicella-zoster virus vaccine. DESIGN: Retrospective review of employee medical records and data on the cost of special paid absence for susceptible healthcare workers after exposure to varicella or herpes zoster. SETTING: A 988-bed tertiary-care university hospital. RESULTS: In 1994, 224 hospital employees (3.4%) were susceptible to the varicella-zoster virus. There were 40 exposures to varicella and herpes zoster in that year, involving 29 of the susceptible employees. Nine (31%) of the exposed susceptibles became varicella immune by indirect fluorescent antibody testing subsequent to exposure. Seventeen (59%) have had multiple varicella exposures and special paid absences while employed by the hospital. In 1994, wages paid to healthcare workers while furloughed for the communicable period following varicella exposure totaled $38,463.93. An additional $24,748.74 was paid to replacement workers during that same time. Varicella vaccine to immunize all 224 susceptibles in 1994 would have cost $17,920. Absences due to varicella and herpes zoster exposure also result in disruptions to patient care. CONCLUSIONS: Varicella vaccination for varicella-susceptible healthcare workers at a university hospital would result in financial savings and improved patient care. We recommend that other institutions consider the costs and benefits of adopting a varicella immunization program for their susceptible employees.


Assuntos
Varicela/prevenção & controle , Herpes Zoster/prevenção & controle , Programas de Imunização/economia , Controle de Infecções/economia , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional/prevenção & controle , Recursos Humanos em Hospital , Varicela/diagnóstico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Herpes Zoster/diagnóstico , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Testes Imunológicos , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Licença Médica/economia , Licença Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas Virais/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Virais/economia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA