Ischemic Stroke in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation at Warfarin Initiation: Assessment via a Large Insurance Database.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stroke risk may increase shortly after warfarin initiation in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. Because of the brief period and limited number of events, large samples are needed to study this effect. We compared 30-day rates of ischemic stroke between nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients initiating warfarin to nonwarfarin comparators using an insurance claims database. METHODS: We identified nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients via 1 inpatient/2 outpatient diagnosis claims from the MarketScan database, January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2010. We studied patients initiating warfarin using prescription claims and 1:1 matched 22 669 initiators to comparators based on age, sex, diagnosis date, and warfarin propensity score. Follow-up began on initiation date; patients were censored at discontinuation/switch of therapy, disenrollment, or end of the study. The median follow-up was 415 days. Cox regression was used to study differences in ischemic stroke risks between warfarin initiators and comparators while controlling for important prognostic factors. RESULTS: Warfarin initiators were generally similar to comparators in clinical features but had higher CHADS2 scores (1.26 versus 1.19). The first 30-day ischemic stroke rate was higher among warfarin initiators than comparators (1.47%/y (27/1836) versus 0.98%/y (18/1837); P=0.18) but lower subsequently (0.81%/y [134/16 543] versus 1.09%/y [406/37 248]; P=0.002). Multivariable regression confirmed a significant interaction between follow-up and warfarin use with the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for warfarin/comparator as 1.46 (0.80-2.65) in the first 30 days and 0.70 (0.57-0.85) afterward. CONCLUSIONS: Warfarin effect was qualitatively different in the first 30 days after initiation than subsequently. This is consistent with a modest increase in stroke risk occurring briefly after starting warfarin.

Breastfeeding and subsequent maternal visceral adiposity.

Women gain visceral fat during pregnancy. Studies examining the impact of breastfeeding on maternal body composition are inconclusive. We examined the extent to which breastfeeding was associated with visceral adiposity in a sample of US women. This was a cross-sectional analysis of 351 women aged 45-58 years, who were free of clinical cardiovascular disease and had not used oral contraceptives or hormone replacement therapy in the 3 months prior to enrollment in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN)-Heart Study (2001-2003). History of breastfeeding was self-reported. Computed tomography was used to assess abdominal adiposity. Among premenopausal/early-peri-menopausal mothers, those who never breastfed had 28% greater visceral adiposity (95% confidence interval (CI): 11-49, P = 0.001), 4.7% greater waist-hip ratio (95% CI: 1.9-7.4, P < 0.001), and 6.49 cm greater waist circumference (95% CI: 3.71-9.26, P < 0.001) than mothers who breastfed all of their children for ≥3 months in models adjusting for study site; age; parity; years since last birth; socioeconomic, lifestyle, and family history variables; early adult BMI; and current BMI. In comparison to women who were nulliparous, mothers who breastfed all of their children for ≥3 months had similar amounts of visceral fat (P > 0.05). In contrast, premenopausal/early-peri-menopausal mothers who had never breastfed had significantly greater visceral adiposity (42% (95% CI: 17-70), P < 0.001), waist circumference (6.15 cm (95% CI: 2.75-9.56), P < 0.001), and waist-hip ratio (3.7% (95% CI: 0.69-6.8), P = 0.02) than nulliparous women. No significant relationships were observed among late peri-menopausal/postmenopausal women. In conclusion, until menopause, mothers who did not breastfeed all of their children for ≥3 months exhibit significantly greater amounts of metabolically active visceral fat than mothers who had breastfed all of their children for ≥3 months.

Adherence and persistence with duloxetine and hospital utilization in patients with major depressive disorder.

The aim of this study was to examine the association between duloxetine adherence/persistence and hospital utilization. In a managed care claims database, 8521 patients with a major depressive disorder diagnosis were initiated on duloxetine in 2006. Patients had no active duloxetine prescription for 6 months before initiation and had continuous enrollment for 12 months preinitiation and postinitiation. Adherence was defined as medication possession ratio of 0.8 or more, and persistence was defined as the duration of therapy without exceeding a 30-day gap. Logistic regression and negative binominal regression were conducted. Overall, 55.8% of patients were adherent and the average duration of duloxetine therapy was 118.4 days within 6 months after initiation. Adherent patients had significantly lower rates of hospitalization (19.7 vs. 23.4%, P<0.0001) and emergency room visits (30.6 vs. 36.9%, P<0.0001) than nonadherent patients. Hospitalization and emergency room visits were significantly reduced with treatment persistence (P<0.0001). After adjustment for demographics, comorbidities, and prior hospitalization, adherence was associated with reduced hospitalization (odds ratio=0.86) and emergency room visits (odds ratio=0.80). Patients on duloxetine of more than 90 days, compared with less than 31 days, were 16% less likely to be hospitalized and 22% less likely to have emergency room visits. Duloxetine adherence and persistence appear to be associated with reduced hospital utilization in the 1-year follow-up period.