An Assessment of Publication Status of Pediatric Liver Transplantation Studies.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric liver transplantation is a highly specialized, challenging field. Selective reporting may introduce bias into evidence based clinical decision making, but the precise extent of unpublished data in pediatric liver transplantation is unknown today. We therefore assessed the public availability of completed clinical trials in pediatric liver transplantation. METHODS: We determined the proportion of published and unpublished pre-registered, completed pediatric liver transplantation studies on ClinicalTrials.gov. The major trial and literature databases, i.e., clinicaltrials.gov, Pubmed, and Google Scholar were searched for publications. In addition, principal investigators or sponsors were contacted directly. STROBE criteria were applied for the descriptive analysis. RESULTS: Out of N = 33 studies focusing on pediatric liver transplantation registered as completed until March 2014 on clinicaltrials.gov, N = 19 (58%) studies were published until February 2015, whereas N = 14 (42%) studies remained unpublished. The unpublished trials contain data from N = 2105 (35%) patients out of a total population of N = 6044 study participants. Median time-to-publication, i.e., the period from completion of the trial until public availability of the data was 23 IQR 10 to 28 months. Most pertinent key questions in pediatric liver transplantation, i.e., surgical procedures, immunosuppression, concomitant infections, and graft rejection were addressed in 48% of studies (N = 16/33), half of which were published. CONCLUSION: Half of the clinical trials in pediatric liver transplantation focused on key questions such as surgical procedures, immunosuppression, concomitant infections, and graft rejection. There is still a considerable amount of unpublished studies results in pediatric liver transplantation. Time from study completion to publication was almost twice as long as the 12 months mandatory FDAAA-timeline with a trend towards acceleration over time. The data should serve as a baseline for future progress in the field. More stringent publication of completed trials and focused multicenter research should be encouraged.

Effects of budesonide inhalation on energy expenditure, somatic growth and salivary cortisol levels in preterm infants with chronic lung disease.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that the use of inhaled budesonide (BUD) would alter somatic growth by increasing energy expenditure (EE) in premature infants with chronic lung disease (CLD). METHODS: A prospective study was conducted of the effect of BUD on EE, growth and salivary cortisol excretion in infants with CLD who required supplemental oxygen and were treated with inhaled BUD for 4 weeks according the severity of their CLD, or without BUD treatment. Infants were compared with a healthy control group matched for gestational age. EE, anthropometric measures and salivary cortisol levels were examined before, during and after BUD treatment. RESULTS: A total of 30 spontaneously breathing premature infants were enrolled in the study. EE in CLD (BUD) and CLD (no BUD) patients were greater than EE in healthy preterm infants (p < 0.01) at the study time points. Growth did not differ between the groups. Salivary cortisol levels of treated infants were significantly lower when compared with the levels of nontreated infants. CONCLUSION: The administration of inhaled BUD in preterm infants with CLD was associated with an increase in EE, a suppression of endogenous cortisol production and with no effect on duration of supplemental oxygen, but did not compromise their somatic growth.

Energy expenditure in neonates with Down syndrome.

Resting energy expenditure was measured in term neonates with Down syndrome during the first week of life and compared with healthy neonates. Infants with Down syndrome expended 14% fewer calories than did healthy infants of the same age.