Development of a Battery of In Silico Prediction Tools for Drug-Induced Liver Injury from the Vantage Point of Translational Safety Assessment.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains a challenge when translating knowledge from the preclinical stage to human use cases. Attempts to model human DILI directly based on the information from drug labels have had some success; however, the approach falls short of providing insights or addressing uncertainty due to the difficulty of decoupling the idiosyncratic nature of human DILI outcomes. Our approach in this comparative analysis is to leverage existing preclinical and clinical data as well as information on metabolism to better translate mammalian to human DILI. The human DILI knowledge base from the United States Food and Drug Administration (U.S. FDA) National Center for Toxicology Research contains 1036 pharmaceuticals from diverse therapeutic categories. A human DILI training set of 305 oral marketed drugs was prepared and a binary classification scheme applied. The second knowledge base consists of mammalian repeated dose toxicity with liver toxicity data from various regulatory sources. Within this knowledge base, we identified 278 pharmaceuticals containing 198 marketed or withdrawn oral drugs with data from the U.S. FDA new drug application and 98 active pharmaceutical ingredients from ToxCast. From this collection, a set of 225 oral drugs was prepared as the mammalian hepatotoxicity training set with particular end points of pathology findings in the liver and bile duct. Both human and mammalian data sets were processed using various learning algorithms, including artificial intelligence approaches. The external validations for both models were comparable to the training statistics. These data sets were also used to extract species-differentiating chemotypes that differentiate DILI effects on humans from mammals. A systematic workflow was devised to predict human DILI and provide mechanistic insights. For a given query molecule, both human and mammalian models are run. If the predictions are discordant, both metabolites and parents are investigated for quantitative structure-activity relationship and species-differentiating chemotypes. Their results are combined using the Dempster-Shafer decision theory to yield a final outcome prediction for human DILI with estimated uncertainty. Finally, these tools are implementable within an in silico platform for systematic evaluation.

Can Transcriptomic Profiles from Cancer Cell Lines Be Used for Toxicity Assessment?

In vitro toxicogenomics (TGx) has the potential to replace or supplement animal studies. However, TGx studies often suffer from a limited sample size and cell types. Meanwhile, transcriptomic data have been generated for tens of thousands of compounds using cancer cell lines mainly for drug efficacy screening. Here, we asked the question of whether these types of transcriptomic data can be used to support toxicity assessment. We compared transcriptomic profiles from three cancer lines (HL60, MCF7, and PC3) from the CMap data set with those using primary hepatocytes or in vivo repeated dose studies from the Open TG-GATEs database by using our previously reported pair ranking (PRank) method. We observed an encouraging similarity between HL60 and human primary hepatocytes (PRank score = 0.70), suggesting the two cellular assays could be potentially interchangeable. When the analysis was limited to drug-induced liver injury (DILI)-related compounds or genes, the cancer cell lines exhibited promise in DILI assessment in comparison with conventional TGx systems (i.e., human primary hepatocytes or rat in vivo repeated dose). Also, some toxicity-related pathways, such as PPAR signaling pathways and fatty acid-related pathways, were preserved across various assay systems, indicating the assay transferability is biological process-specific. Furthermore, we established a potential application of transcriptomic profiles of cancer cell lines for studying immune-related biological processes involving some specific cell types. Moreover, if PRank analysis was focused on only landmark genes from L1000 or S1500+, the advantage of cancer cell lines over the TGx studies was limited. In conclusion, repurposing of existing cancer-related transcript profiling data has great potential for toxicity assessment, particularly in predicting DILI.

The Liver Toxicity Knowledge Base (LKTB) and drug-induced liver injury (DILI) classification for assessment of human liver injury.

INTRODUCTION: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is challenging for drug development, clinical practice and regulation. The Liver Toxicity Knowledge Base (LTKB) provides essential data for DILI study. Areas covered: The LTKB provided various types of data that can be used to assess and predict DILI. Among much information available, several reference drug lists with annotated human DILI risk are of important. The LTKB DILI classification data include DILI severity concern determined by the FDA drug labeling, DILI severity score from the NIH LiverTox database, and other DILI classification schemes from the literature. Overall, ~1000 drugs were annotated with at least one classification scheme, of which around 750 drugs were flagged for some degree of DILI risk. Expert commentary: The LTKB provides a centralized repository of information for DILI study and predictive model development. The DILI classification data in LTKB could be a useful resource for developing biomarkers, predictive models and assessing data from emerging technologies such as in silico, high-throughput and high-content screening methodologies. In coming years, streamlining the prediction process by including DILI predictive models for both DILI severity and types in LTKB would enhance the identification of compounds with the DILI potential earlier in drug development and risk assessment.