Prospective assessment of white matter integrity in adult stem cell transplant recipients.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is often used in the treatment of hematologic disorders. Although it can be curative, the pre-transplant conditioning regimen can be associated with neurotoxicity. In this prospective study, we examined white matter (WM) integrity with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and neuropsychological functioning before and one year after HSCT in twenty-two patients with hematologic disorders and ten healthy controls evaluated at similar intervals. Eighteen patients received conditioning treatment with high-dose (HD) chemotherapy, and four had full dose total body irradiation (fTBI) and HD chemotherapy prior to undergoing an allogeneic or autologous HSCT. The results showed a significant decrease in mean diffusivity (MD) and axial diffusivity (AD) in diffuse WM regions one year after HSCT (p-corrected <0.05) in the patient group compared to healthy controls. At baseline, patients treated with allogeneic HSCT had higher MD and AD in the left hemisphere WM than autologous HSCT patients (p-corrected <0.05). One year post-transplant, patients treated with allogeneic HSCT had lower fractional anisotropy (FA) and higher radial diffusivity (RD) in the right hemisphere and left frontal WM compared to patients treated with autologous HSCT (p-corrected <0.05).There were modest but significant correlations between MD values and cognitive test scores, and these were greatest for timed tests and in projection tracts. Patients showed a trend toward a decline in working memory, and had lower cognitive test scores than healthy controls at the one-year assessment. The findings suggest a relatively diffuse pattern of alterations in WM integrity in adult survivors of HSCT.

Limitations of family cancer history assessment at initial surgical consultation.

PURPOSE: Although important for the diagnosis of familial clustering of colorectal cancer and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, the accuracy of familial cancer history assessment in the office setting has been questioned. Furthermore, there are few publications describing the optimal method for accurately capturing a family cancer history. The purpose of this study was to determine how well family cancer history is assessed in patients with early age-of-onset colorectal cancer at initial surgical consultation compared with a telephone interview and mailed questionnaire. METHODS: Medical records of patients 40 years old or younger at the time of colorectal cancer surgery were reviewed for documentation of family cancer history at initial surgical consultation. In addition, family cancer history was solicited from surviving patients or their next of kin by telephone and a mailed questionnaire. The kappa coefficient was used to measure degree of correlation between family cancer history obtained at initial surgical consultation and subsequent telephone interview and questionnaire. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five patients were available for analysis. Family cancer history was documented on the initial surgical consultation report in 78 percent of cases. Although 31.2 percent were identified as having no family cancer history at initial surgical consultation, this proportion decreased to 13.5 percent after telephone interviews and questionnaires. Family history assessment at initial surgical consultation also failed to identify 7 of 11 individuals meeting Amsterdam criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and 10 of 16 individuals meeting modified clinical criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Although family cancer history was commonly obtained during the initial surgical consultation of patients with colorectal cancer, there was a tendency to underestimate the extent of familial cancer. A telephone interview and questionnaire conducted at a later date may reveal a more comprehensive family cancer history. This is an important observation, because individuals identified as high-risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer or familial clustering of colorectal cancer require special consideration with respect to screening, surveillance, and surgical management.

The memorial symptom assessment scale short form (MSAS-SF).

BACKGROUND: The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale Short Form (MSAS-SF), an abbreviated version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale, measures each of 32 symptoms with respect to distress or frequency alone. A physical symptom subscale (PHYS), psychologic symptom subscale (PSYCH), and global distress index (GDI) can be derived from the Short Form. We validated the MSAS-SF in a population of cancer patients. METHODS: Two hundred ninety-nine cancer patients examined at the Section of Hematology/Oncology completed the MSAS-SF and the Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy (FACT-G). The Karnofsky performance status (KPS), extent of disease (EOD), and demographic data were assessed. The Cronbach alpha coefficient was used to assess internal reliability. MSAS-SF subscales were assessed against subscales of the FACT-G, the KPS, and EOD to determine criterion validity. Test-retest analysis was performed at 1 day and at 1 week. RESULTS: The Cronbach alpha coefficients for the MSAS-SF subscales ranged from 0.76 to 0.87. The MSAS-SF subscales showed convergent validity with FACT subscales. Correlation coefficients were -0.74 (P < 0.001) for the PHYS and FACT-G physical well-being subscales, -0.68 (P < 0.001) for the PSYCH and FACT emotional well-being subscales, and -0.70 (P < 0.001) for GDI and FACT summary of quality-of-life subscales. The MSAS-SF subscales demonstrated convergent validity with performance status, inpatient status, and extent of disease. The test-retest correlation coefficients for the MSAS-SF subscales ranged from 0.86 to 0.94 at 1 day and from 0.40 to 0.84 for the 1 week group. CONCLUSIONS: The MSAS-SF is a valid and easy to use instrument for symptom assessment.

Quality of life and survival: the role of multidimensional symptom assessment.

BACKGROUND: Recent data from clinical trials suggest that quality-of-life (QOL) measurements may independently predict survival. The relation between survival and QOL measurements was tested among 122 inpatients and 96 outpatients with malignancies at one of four sites (colon, breast, ovary, or prostate) who participated in a cross-sectional validation study of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS), a measure of the frequency of, severity of, and distress caused by physical symptoms. METHODS: The relation between MSAS summary scores and survival was evaluated in a multivariate analysis that adjusted concurrently for other important covariates, such as age, site and extent of disease, inpatient status, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and other QOL measurements. RESULTS: In the multivariate analysis, extent of disease (P < 0.0001), inpatient status (P=0.014), higher MSAS physical symptom subscale score (P=0.004), and lower KPS score (P=0.009) independently predicted decreased survival. Other QOL measurements did not contribute significantly to the model. CONCLUSIONS: The MSAS physical symptom subscale score significantly predicts survival and adds to the prognostic information provided by KPS and extent of disease. Patients may be under-assessed regarding both the number and the severity of symptoms. Measurements of physical symptoms and related distress offer additional prognostic information concerning the survival of patients with cancer and may account for the predictive value of QOL scores.

How accurate is fetal biometry in the assessment of fetal age?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to assess the accuracy of fetal biometry in the midtrimester of pregnancy in the assignment of fetal age. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 152 singleton, 67 twin, and 19 triplet gestations resulting from in vitro fertilization with ultrasonographic fetal biometry from 14 to 22 weeks made up the study population. A gestational age prediction equation was derived from singletons with the use of stepwise linear regression. This equation was compared with 38 previously published equations and then applied to the twin and triplet populations. RESULTS: Head circumference was the best predictor of gestational age (random error [SD] 3.77 days). Addition of abdominal circumference and femur length to head circumference improved the accuracy of the dating equation (random error 3.35 days). Most dating formulas had systematic errors of <1 week. The systematic error was -0.32 day for averaging the singleton-based predictions for twins and -1.26 days for triplets. CONCLUSIONS: Gestational age assessment with the use of fetal biometry from 14 to 22 weeks is accurate for singleton, twin, and triplet gestations.

The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale: an instrument for the evaluation of symptom prevalence, characteristics and distress.

The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS) is a new patient-rated instrument that was developed to provide multidimensional information about a diverse group of common symptoms. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of the MSAS in the cancer population. Randomly selected inpatients and outpatients (n = 246) with prostate, colon, breast or ovarian cancer were assessed using the MSAS and a battery of measures that independently evaluate phenomena related to quality of life. Symptom prevalence in the 218 evaluable patients ranged from 73.9% for lack of energy to 10.6% for difficulty swallowing. Based on a content analysis, three symptoms were deleted and two were added; the revised scale evaluates 32 physical and psychological symptoms. A factor analysis of variance yielded two factors that distinguished three major symptom groups and several subgroups. The major groups comprised psychological symptoms (PSYCH), high prevalence physical symptoms (PHYS H), and low prevalence physical symptoms (PHYS L). Internal consistency was high in the PHYS H and PSYCH groups (Cronback alpha coefficients of 0.88 and 0.83, respectively), and moderate in the PHYS L group (alpha = 0.58). Although the severity, frequency and distress dimensions were highly intercorrelated, canonical correlations and other analyses demonstrated that multidimensional assessment (frequency and distress) augments information about the impact of symptoms. High correlations with clinical status and quality of life measures support the validity of the MSAS and indicate the utility of several subscale scores, including PSYCH, PHYS, and a brief Global Distress Index. The MSAS is a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of symptom prevalence, characteristics and distress. It provides a method for comprehensive symptom assessment that may be useful when information about symptoms is desirable, such as clinical trials that incorporate quality of life measures or studies of symptom epidemiology.

Leukoencephalopathy following high-dose intravenous methotrexate chemotherapy: quantitative assessment of white matter attenuation using computed tomography.

A clinical or subclinical leukoencephalopathy occurs in some children after treatment of acute lymphatic leukemia with prophylactic cranial radiation therapy and parenteral or intrathecal methotrexate. We have observed a similar clinical leukoencephalopathy in patients with bone tumors treated with intravenous high-dose methotrexate and citrovorum factor without cranial irradiation. CT scans of such patients may indicate decreased white matter attenuation, but visual appraisal of this phenomenon is occasionally misleading. A computerized method for analyzing white matter hypodensity by determining the mean attenuation coefficient for one or several contiguous CT slices has therefore been developed. Serial comparisons of this mean attenuation coefficient appear to be more reliable than simple visual appraisal.