Sonographic Assessment of Breast Implants Using Strain Elastography and Shear Wave Elastography in an Animal Model.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To date, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the gold standard for diagnosing breast implant rupture. As MRI is an expensive procedure with limited availability, the improvement of sonographic assessment is desirable. A potentially useful tool in this regard is elastography. To evaluate the diagnostic benefits of strain elastography and shear wave elastography under standardized conditions we developed an animal model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An animal model was created by preparing an implant site in a chicken breast, imitating tissue layers covering a breast implant after mastectomy. Different broken and intact implants were inserted. Thereby, measurements were performed using strain elastography and shear wave elastography. For strain elastography, the resulting images were investigated on repeated patterns. The data generated by shear wave elastography were analyzed for significant differences between the ruptured and intact implants. RESULTS: The animal model using chicken breast generated realistic images and measurements comparable to those of a human breast. Hence, ruptured and intact implants could be compared under standardized conditions. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between intact and ruptured implants with respect to the data generated by shear wave elastography. Qualitative analysis using strain wave elastography showed different patterns between intact and ruptured implants in the animal model. Intact implants showed a characteristic sonographic image of three layers in certain levels. CONCLUSION: Shear wave elastography does not seem to produce reliable data for the evaluation of breast implants, whereas qualitative analysis using strain elastography might be a useful tool to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Doppler Indices and Notching Assessment of Uterine Artery Between the 19th and 22nd Week of Pregnancy in the Prediction of Pregnancy Outcome.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the value of Doppler indices and notching assessment of uterine artery between the 19th and 22nd week of gestation in the prediction of pregnancy outcome such as delivery mode, birth weight, Apgar score, afterbirth pH, fetal presentation, preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction in singleton pregnancy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of Doppler ultrasound of the uterine arteries at 19-22 week of gestation in 1,472 women with singleton pregnancies. RESULTS: Patients with bilateral high resistance-index (RI) and pulsatility-index (RI) or with the presence of a notch showed a significantly higher prevalence of small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), low Apgar Scores at the 1st and the 5th min, high c-section rate, preterm birth, breech birth, placental insufficiency and placental abruption. The presence of a notch significantly increased the prevalence of severe preeclampsia, HELLP-syndrome and oligohydramnios. Also, patients with a bilateral uterine notching had a higher c-section rate along with higher prevalence of SGA and IUGR at screening time. CONCLUSION: Uterine artery Doppler waveform analysis as well as the assessment of the presence of a notch in the second trimester can be used as a screening method to identify women who will thereafter develop a severe adverse outcome.

Cervical screening program and the psychological impact of an abnormal Pap smear: a self-assessment questionnaire study of 590 patients.

PURPOSE: Invasive cervical cancer is today the fourth most common cancer of women in western civilization. Screening programs have led to a continuously decrease. Nevertheless, both screening and a positive test result are known to be associated with a negative psychological impact. Screening programs in European countries differ and thus psychological impact might as well. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychological impact of women with an abnormal Pap smear in a German cohort. METHODS: Between July 2013 and May 2014, a self-assessment questionnaire was distributed to 595 patients that were referred to a special clinic for cervical dysplasia for further evaluation of an abnormal Pap smear. Patients were recruited in five different centers. RESULTS: Most patients (45.9 %) were informed about the test result via phone call by their doctor. 68.8 % of the patients felt anxious and 26.3 % even felt panic. After having talked to their physician, 51.4 % of our cohort still felt worried and only 24.4 % felt reassured. Concerning disease management, 48.4 % underwent a control Pap smear in 6 months. The preferred information source was the physician (63.9 %). Compared to the results in other European countries, our study cohort showed differences concerning age distribution, patients living in a partnership, number of children and especially disease management. CONCLUSION: Cancer screening itself and abnormal test results have an impact on patient's feelings. To reduce the psychological impact, patients need to be better informed about the risks and benefits of cancer screening programs and in case of cervical cancer screening about the meaning of an abnormal test result. Our results underline the importance of a trustful physician-patient relationship in that matter.