OPN, BSP, and Bone Quality-Structural, Biochemical, and Biomechanical Assessment in OPN-/-, BSP-/-, and DKO Mice.

Osteopontin (OPN) and Bone Sialoprotein (BSP), abundantly expressed by osteoblasts and osteoclasts, appear to have important, partly overlapping functions in bone. In gene-knockout (KO, -/-) models of either protein and their double (D)KO in the same CD1/129sv genetic background, we analyzed the morphology, matrix characteristics, and biomechanical properties of femur bone in 2 and 4 month old, male and female mice. OPN-/- mice display inconsistent, perhaps localized hypermineralization, while the BSP-/- are hypomineralized throughout ages and sexes, and the low mineralization of young DKO mice recovers with age. The higher contribution of primary bone remnants in OPN-/- shafts suggests a slow turnover, while their lower percentage in BSP-/- indicates rapid remodeling, despite FTIR-based evidence in this genotype of a high maturity of the mineralized matrix. In 3-point bending assays, OPN-/- bones consistently display higher Maximal Load, Work to Max. Load and in young mice Ultimate Stress, an intrinsic characteristic of the matrix. Young male and old female BSP-/- also display high Work to Max. Load along with low Ultimate Stress. Principal Component Analysis confirms the major role of morphological traits in mechanical competence, and evidences a grouping of the WT phenotype with the OPN-/- and of BSP-/- with DKO, driven by both structural and matrix parameters, suggesting that the presence or absence of BSP has the most profound effects on skeletal properties. Single or double gene KO of OPN and BSP thus have multiple distinct effects on skeletal phenotypes, confirming their importance in bone biology and their interplay in its regulation.

Longitudinal assessment of Leydig cell function in male survivors of childhood cancer.

BACKGROUND: As the number and longevity of childhood cancer survivors increases, assessing treatment-associated late effects remains crucial. We longitudinally examined the incidence of and associated risk factors for Leydig cell dysfunction (LCD) and Leydig cell failure (LCF) in men treated for pediatric cancers at our institution. PROCEDURE: We performed a retrospective longitudinal cohort study of adult male survivors treated for various childhood cancers who are at risk for LCD. The outcomes of interest were serum testosterone and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels during childhood and adulthood. Risk factors assessed included treatment with stem cell transplant, total body irradiation (TBI), and exposure to alkylating agents. RESULTS: Out of 118 eligible subjects, 7.6% had LCF and 14.4% had LCD. Median age at last testosterone level was 20 years. Subjects with sufficient testosterone levels in adulthood (N = 105) remained sufficient for a mean of 11.1 years following completion of cancer treatment. We found significant associations between LCF and treatment with TBI (p < .003) and between LCF in adulthood and testosterone insufficiency in childhood (p < .001). No statistically significant association was found between LCF and cyclophosphamide equivalent dose greater than 20 g/m2 (p = .2). LCF/LCD occurred in a small number of nonirradiated patients treated with the highest doses of alkylators. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of LCF and LCD are low in male survivors of childhood cancer. Longitudinally, there is an association between childhood testosterone insufficiency and LCF in adulthood. Alkylating agents and stem cell transplant without TBI were not associated with LCF in our study.

Chatbot Artificial Intelligence for Genetic Cancer Risk Assessment and Counseling: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: Most individuals with a hereditary cancer syndrome are unaware of their genetic status to underutilization of hereditary cancer risk assessment. Chatbots, or programs that use artificial intelligence to simulate conversation, have emerged as a promising tool in health care and, more recently, as a potential tool for genetic cancer risk assessment and counseling. Here, we evaluated the existing literature on the use of chatbots in genetic cancer risk assessment and counseling. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using key electronic databases to identify studies which use chatbots for genetic cancer risk assessment and counseling. Eligible studies were further subjected to meta-analysis. RESULTS: Seven studies met inclusion criteria, evaluating five distinct chatbots. Three studies evaluated a chatbot that could perform genetic cancer risk assessment, one study evaluated a chatbot that offered patient counseling, and three studies included both functions. The pooled estimated completion rate for the genetic cancer risk assessment was 36.7% (95% CI, 14.8 to 65.9). Two studies included comprehensive patient characteristics, and none involved a comparison group. Chatbots varied as to the involvement of a health care provider in the process of risk assessment and counseling. CONCLUSION: Chatbots have been used to streamline genetic cancer risk assessment and counseling and hold promise for reducing barriers to genetic services. Data regarding user and nonuser characteristics are lacking, as are data regarding comparative effectiveness to usual care. Future research may consider the impact of chatbots on equitable access to genetic services.

Achieving universal genetic assessment for women with ovarian cancer: Are we there yet? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Several professional organizations recommend universal genetic assessment for people with ovarian cancer as identifying pathogenic variants can affect treatment, prognosis, and all-cause mortality for patients and relatives. We sought to evaluate the literature on genetic assessment for women with ovarian cancer and determine if any interventions or patient characteristics drive utilization of services. METHODS: We searched key electronic databases to identify trials that evaluated genetic assessment for people with ovarian cancer. Trials with the primary aim to evaluate utilization of genetic assessment with or without interventions were included. Eligible trials were subjected to meta-analysis and the moderating influence of health interventions on rates of genetic assessment were examined. RESULTS: A total of 35 studies were included (19 report on utilization of genetic services without an intervention, 7 with an intervention, and 9 with both scenarios). Without an intervention, pooled estimates for referral to genetic counseling and completion of genetic testing were 39% [CI 27-53%] and 30% [CI 19-44%]. Clinician-facilitated interventions included: mainstreaming of genetic services (99% [CI 86-100%]), telemedicine (75% [CI 43-93%]), clinic-embedded genetic counselor (76% [CI 32-95%]), reflex tumor somatic genetic assessment (64% [CI 17-94%]), universal testing (57% [28-82%]), and referral forms (26% [CI 10-53%]). Random-effects pooled proportions demonstrated that Black vs. White race was associated with a lower rate of genetic testing (26%[CI 17-38%] vs. 40% [CI 25-57%]) as was being un-insured vs. insured (23% [CI 18-28%] vs. 38% [CI 26-53%]). CONCLUSIONS: Reported rates of genetic testing for people with ovarian cancer remain well below the goal of universal testing. Interventions such as mainstreaming can improve testing uptake. Strategies aimed at improving utilization of genetic services should consider existing disparities in race and insurance status.

Financial toxicity, mental health, and gynecologic cancer treatment: The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic among low-income women in New York City.

BACKGROUND: New York City (NYC) emerged as an epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic, and marginalized populations were affected at disproportionate rates. The authors sought to determine the impact of COVID-19 on cancer treatment, anxiety, and financial distress among low-income patients with gynecologic cancer during the peak of the NYC pandemic. METHODS: Medicaid-insured women who were receiving gynecologic oncology care at 2 affiliated centers were contacted by telephone interviews between March 15 and April 15, 2020. Demographics and clinical characteristics were obtained through self-report and retrospective chart review. Financial toxicity, anxiety, and cancer worry were assessed using modified, validated surveys. RESULTS: In total, 100 patients completed the telephone interview. The median age was 60 years (range, 19-86 years), and 71% had an annual income <$40,000. A change in employment status and early stage cancer (stage I and II) were associated with an increase in financial distress (P < .001 and P = .008, respectively). Early stage cancer and telehealth participation were significantly associated with increased worry about future finances (P = .017 and P = .04, respectively). Lower annual income (<$40,000) was associated with increased cancer worry and anxiety compared with higher annual income (>$40,000; P = .036 and P = .017, respectively). When controlling for telehealth participation, income, primary language, and residence in a high COVID-19 prevalence area, a delay in medical care resulted in a 4-fold increased rate of anxiety (P = .023, 95% CI, 1.278-14.50). Race was not significantly associated with increased financial distress, cancer worry, or anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Low socioeconomic status was the most common risk factor for increased financial distress, cancer worry, and anxiety. Interventions aimed at improving access to timely oncology care should be implemented during this ongoing pandemic.