Methamphetamine-Associated Heart Failure Hospitalizations Across the United States: Geographic and Social Disparities.

Background Although methamphetamine abuse is associated with the development of heart failure (HF), nationwide data on methamphetamine-associated HF (MethHF) hospitalizations are limited. This study evaluates nationwide HF hospitalizations associated with substance abuse to better understand MethHF prevalence trends and the clinical characteristics of those patients. Methods and Results This cross-sectional period-prevalence study used hospital discharge data from the National Inpatient Sample to identify adult primary HF hospitalizations with a secondary diagnosis of abuse of methamphetamines, cocaine, or alcohol in the United States from 2002 to 2014. All 2014 MethHF admissions were separated by regional census division to evaluate geographical distribution. Demographics, payer information, and clinical characteristics of MethHF hospitalizations were compared with all other HF hospitalizations. Total nationwide MethHF hospitalizations increased from 547 in 2002 to 6625 in 2014 with a predominance on the West Coast. Methamphetamine abuse was slightly more common among primary HF hospitalizations compared with all-cause hospitalizations (7.4 versus 6.4 per 1000; Cohen h=0.012; P<0.001). Among HF hospitalizations, patients with MethHF were younger (mean age, 48.9 versus 72.4 years; Cohen d=1.93; P<0.001), more likely to be on Medicaid (59.4% versus 8.8%; Cohen h=1.16; P<0.001) or uninsured (12.0% versus 2.6%; Cohen h=0.36; P<0.001), and more likely to present to urban hospitals (43.8% versus 28.3%; Cohen h=0.32; P<0.001) than patients with non-methamphetamine associated HF. Patients with MethHF had higher rates of psychiatric comorbidities and were more likely to leave the hospital against medical advice. Conclusions MethHF hospitalizations have significantly increased in the United States, particularly on the West Coast. Coordinated public health policies and systems of care are needed to address this rising epidemic.

Hypertension in Hispanics/Latinos: Epidemiology and Considerations for Management.

ABSTRAC: PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hispanic/Latino Americans are among the fastest growing ethnic populations in the United States (US). Hypertension, in particular uncontrolled hypertension, is a significant source of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in this population. In this review, we outline the epidemiology of hypertension and certain considerations in the management of hypertension in this heterogeneous population. RECENT FINDINGS: Substantial variation in hypertension prevalence and control exists among different ethnic subgroups of Hispanics. More specifically, and in the community, outcomes for hypertension management are less favorable, suggesting that suboptimal hypertension control may be the result of social factors. In this regard, community-based interventions have shown promise in addressing these shortfalls. Nonetheless, significant barriers to effective hypertension care exist in the Hispanic community, including the increasing prevalence of comorbidities that impact hypertension such as obesity. Pharmacologic therapies for hypertension have been highly effective in Hispanic subjects participating in clinical trials. Notably, studies that disaggregate Hispanics by their ancestral origin may provide greater insight into the sources of ethnic disparities. Culturally tailored interventions may improve hypertension management and outcomes in Hispanic populations. Additional population and clinical trials in Hispanic patients of different ancestral heritages are needed.

Outcomes following implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generator replacement in patients with recovered left ventricular systolic function: The National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

BACKGROUND: Some patients with heart failure (HF) experience recovery of left ventricular (LV) systolic function by the end of their implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) generator battery life. Outcomes following generator replacement in this setting are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe outcomes following ICD generator replacement associated with recovery of LV systolic function. METHODS: We evaluated 26,197 Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in the American College of Cardiology's National Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD Registry who underwent primary prevention ICD generator replacement between 2006 and 2009, stratified by LV ejection fraction (LVEF): reduced (LVEF ≤35%), partially recovered (LVEF >35% and ≤50%), and recovered (LVEF >50%). RESULTS: At the time of generator replacement, 1915 (7.3%) patients had recovered LVEF and 4576 (17.5%) had partially recovered LVEF. Periprocedural events were rare (<1%) in all patients. In patients with reduced LVEF, the incidence of HF readmission and mortality at 3 years was 27.5% and 32.7%, respectively. In comparison, the rates of HF readmission and mortality were lower for patients with partially recovered LVEF (readmission: 15.9%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-0.72; mortality: 23.0%; HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.76-0.87) and those with recovered LVEF (readmission: 12.2%; HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.48-0.63; mortality: 18.2%; HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.64-0.80). CONCLUSION: Patients with partially recovered and recovered LVEF have lower risks of mid-term adverse outcomes than do those with reduced LVEF following ICD generator replacement. Approximately 3 in 4 patients continue to have reduced LVEF at the time of generator replacement and are at high risk of HF readmission and mortality. These data highlight the prognostic associations of LVEF in patients undergoing generator replacement as well as the clinical encounter for generator replacement as an opportunity to identify those at increased risk of adverse outcomes.

Associations of cardiovascular disease risk factors with abdominal aortic calcium volume and density: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Abdominal aortic calcium (AAC) predicts future cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and all-cause mortality independent of CVD risk factors. The standard AAC score, the Agatston, up-weights for greater calcium density, and thus models higher calcium density as associated with increased CVD risk. We determined associations of CVD risk factors with AAC volume and density (separately). METHODS: In a multi-ethnic cohort of community living adults, we used abdominal computed tomography scans to measure AAC volume and density. Multivariable linear regression was used to determine the period cross-sectional independent associations of CVD risk factors with AAC volume and AAC density in participants with prevalent AAC. RESULTS: Among 1413 participants with non-zero AAC scores, the mean age was 65 ± 9 years, 52% were men, 44% were European-, 24% were Hispanic-, 18% were African-, and 14% were Chinese Americans (EA, HA, AA, and CA respectively). Median (interquartile range, IQR) for AAC volume was 628 mm3 (157-1939 mm3), and mean AAC density was 3.0 ± 0.6. Compared to EA, each of HA, AA, and CA had lower natural log (ln) AAC volume, but higher AAC density. After adjustments for AAC density, older age, ever smoking history, higher systolic blood pressure, elevated total cholesterol, reduced HDL cholesterol, statin and anti-hypertensive medication use, family history of myocardial infarction, and alcohol consumption were significantly associated with higher ln(AAC volume). In contrast, after adjustments for ln(AAC volume), older age, ever smoking history, higher BMI, and lower HDL cholesterol were significantly associated with lower AAC density. CONCLUSIONS: Several CVD risk factors were associated with higher AAC volume, but lower AAC density. Future studies should investigate the impact of calcium density of aortic plaques in CVD.