RESUMO
Severe asthma imposes a significant burden on individuals, families and the healthcare system. Treatment is complex, due to disease heterogeneity, comorbidities and complexity in care pathways. New approaches and treatments improve health outcomes for people with severe asthma. However, emerging multidimensional and targeted treatment strategies require a reorganisation of asthma care. Consensus is required on how reorganisation should occur and what areas require further research. The Centre of Excellence in Severe Asthma convened three forums between 2015 and 2018, hosting experts from Australia, New Zealand and the UK. The forums were complemented by a survey of clinicians involved in the management of people with severe asthma. We sought to: (i) identify areas of consensus among experts; (ii) define activities and resources required for the implementation of findings into practice; and (iii) identify specific priority areas for future research. Discussions identified areas of unmet need including assessment and diagnosis of severe asthma, models of care and treatment pathways, add-on treatment approaches and patient perspectives. We recommend development of education and training activities, clinical resources and standards of care documents, increased stakeholder engagement and public awareness campaigns and improved access to infrastructure and funding. Further, we propose specific future research to inform clinical decision-making and develop novel therapies. A concerted effort is required from all stakeholders (including patients, healthcare professionals and organisations and government) to integrate new evidence-based practices into clinical care and to advance research to resolve questions relevant to improving outcomes for people with severe asthma.
Assuntos
Asma , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/epidemiologia , Asma/terapia , Austrália/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Humanos , Nova Zelândia/epidemiologia , OrganizaçõesRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Asbestos-related diseases (ARDs) have increased globally over the decades, causing an economic burden and increased health care costs. It is difficult to predict the risk of development of ARDs and of respiratory disability among workers with a history of asbestos exposure. Blood based biomarkers have been reported as promising tools for the early detection of malignant mesothelioma. This study investigated whether serum soluble mesothelin-related peptide (SMRP) would reflect severity of disablement in compensable ARDs. METHODS: SMRP levels were measured in a cohort of 514 asbestos-exposed subjects. Severity of ARDs was assessed by a Medical Authority comprising four specially qualified respiratory physicians. Severity of ARDs and SMRP levels were compared. RESULTS: Mean (standard deviation) serum SMRP level in the population with compensable ARDs (n = 150) was 0.95 (0.65) nmol/L, and was positively associated with disability assessment (p = 0.01). Mean SMRP level in healthy asbestos-exposed subjects was significantly lower than those with pleural plaques (p < 0.0001) and in subjects with ARDs who received compensation (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that serum SMRP levels correlate with severity of compensable ARDs. Serum SMRP could potentially be applied to monitor progress of ARDs. Further prospective work is needed to confirm the relationship between SMRP and disability assessment in this population.
RESUMO
Biomarkers in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) have been widely evaluated in respiratory research as non-invasive methods of sampling the lungs. These methods are particularly attractive in lung transplantation (LTx) as they are simple, repeatable and sensitive. Chronic rejection, manifest by progressive airflow limitation and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), is currently the major limiting factor to long-term survival in LTx. Early detection of BOS and initiation of appropriate treatment could significantly improve survival. Exhaled breath biomarkers could allow early diagnosis of factors associated with chronic rejection. FeNO is elevated in LTx patients with infections and chronic rejection prior to clinical presentation, and several EBC biomarkers and volatile organic compound patterns also show promise in these areas. This review summarizes information on exhaled breath biomarkers in LTx and discusses their potential role in the management of LTx patients.