Stomas: ethnicity and quality of life.

AIM: Stoma formation is believed to have a more significant effect on quality of life in Asian patients than in non-Asian patients, but this has never been formally demonstrated. This study examined factors which may influence quality of life following stoma formation with particular reference to ethnicity. METHOD: Quality of life was measured (using an established questionnaire) in consecutive patients undergoing stoma formation under the care of two colorectal surgeons. RESULTS: Quality of life is poorer in Asian than in non-Asian patients 46 ± 13 vs 60 ± 12 (P = 0.007). This difference is restricted to those born outside the UK and to those who cannot speak English (P = 0.0008 and P = 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The association between stoma formation and poor quality of life in Asian patients is more complicated than previously assumed. Selected patient groups can be targeted with information and support.

Assessment of a patient consultation questionnaire-based scoring system for stratification of outpatient risk of colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The UK government's fast-track 2-week wait (2WW) rule and colorectal cancer guidelines aimed to detect patients at high risk of having colorectal cancer, but the yield has been poor. A patient consultation questionnaire (PCQ)-based scoring system may be an effective tool for prioritizing colorectal referrals. The aim of this study was to validate the system in a large and ethnically diverse population and to compare it with 2WW referrals. METHODS: Over a 1-year period, all colorectal referrals (2WW and traditional letters) at nine hospitals in Leicestershire were sent a PCQ to complete and return. A weighted numerical score (WNS), which reflects the patient's risk of having colorectal cancer, was calculated and compared with the hospital diagnosis. RESULTS: Of a total of 1422 PCQs returned, 83 patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer. The 2WW referrals constituted 35.7 per cent of all referrals. The mean WNS of patients with colorectal cancer was significantly higher than that of the other patients (mean 76.3 versus 48.9 respectively; P < 0.001). For similar cancer detection rates (or sensitivity), the specificity of a WNS cut-off of 70 was significantly better than that of the 2WW system (82.7 versus 66.1 per cent; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The PCQ-based WNS system improves specificity for detecting colorectal cancer, particularly when the WNS exceeds 70.

Prospective comparison of POSSUM and P-POSSUM with clinical assessment of mortality following emergency surgery.

BACKGROUND: Tools to accurately estimate the risk of death following emergency surgery are useful adjuncts to informed consent and clinical decisions. This prospective study compared the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) and Portsmouth POSSUM (P-POSSUM) scoring systems with clinical judgement in predicting mortality from emergency surgery. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively from 163 patients. Details of the physiological and operative severity scores were recorded for POSSUM and P-POSSUM. The estimates of both the surgeon and anaesthetist for 30-day and in-hospital mortality were also recorded pre-operatively. The accuracies of the four predictions were then compared with actual mortalities using linear and exponential analysis and receiver operator characteristics (ROC). RESULTS: P-POSSUM gave the most accurate prediction of 30-day mortality using linear analysis [observed to expected ratio (O : E) = 1.0]. POSSUM gave the most accurate prediction using exponential analysis (O : E = 1.15). Clinical judgement of mortality from both operating surgeons and anaesthetists compared favourably with the scoring systems for 30-day mortality (O : E = 0.83 and O : E = 0.93, respectively). ROC analyses showed both clinical judgement and the POSSUM scores to be good predictors of 30-day mortality with area under the curve values (AUC) of 0.903, 0.907, 0.946 and 0.940 for surgeons, anaesthetists, POSSUM and P-POSSUM respectively. CONCLUSIONS: POSSUM and P-POSSUM appear to be useful indicators for the prediction of mortality. Clinical judgement compares strongly with scoring systems in predicting post-operative mortality, but may underestimate mortality in very high-risk patients with more than 90% mortality.