Medicaid and Medicare Part B spending on immunomodulators and biosimilars.

INTRODUCTION: Prices for immunomodulators used in dermatological conditions are rising in the United States. While Medicare Part-D solely covers medication costs, Medicare Part-B covers outpatient infusion and injection costs given by medical professionals. We aim to analyze recent trends in Medicare Part-B spending on immunomodulators and their biosimilars used in the treatment of common chronic inflammatory dermatoses. METHODS: The 2012-2018 Medicare Part-B spending data on immunomodulators commonly used for dermatologic conditions were extracted from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services database. Inflation was adjusted to reflect 2012-dollar amounts using the Consumer Price Index. RESULTS: Medicare Part-B spending has increased by 27.5% from 2012 to 2018 ($2.5B, $3.2B). Average annual total spending (AATS) is greatest for rituximab ($1,522,757,520), and average annual spending per maintenance dose (AASPMD) is greatest for ustekinumab-90 mg ($12,976). The percent change in AASPMD increased for all immunomodulators with Etanercept-50 mg having the greatest percent change (+64.6%, +$285.70). Infliximab had a greater AATS and AASPMD than its biosimilars. DISCUSSION: Medicare Part-B spending is often overlooked but plays a big role in federal healthcare spending. Exploring the strategic use of less expensive biosimilars could help mitigate spending.

Allergenic potential, marketing claims, and pricing of facial moisturizers.

Ingredients found in facial moisturizers can impact a myriad of skin conditions, including sensitive skin syndrome and contact dermatitis. There is a paucity of evidence on the allergenic potential and marketing claims of facial moisturizers, posing challenges to clinician recommendation and consumer selection. In this study, we systematically evaluate the 100 top-selling sun protective facial moisturizers that claim to be natural, fragrance free, expert-approved, age preventing, beneficial for sensitive skin, and sun protective. Allergenic potential of these moisturizers is evaluated based on ingredients used and prices and consumer ratings are compared. Accordingly, 75 of 100 marketed at least one additional benefit. "Anti-aging" products had the highest average price ($14.99/oz) and "expert-approved" had the lowest ($5.91/oz). Consumer rating was highest for facial moisturizers that were "fragrance-free" (4.35/5.00) whereas products that were "natural" received the lowest ratings (3.49/5.00). The most prevalent allergens found in these moisturizers were ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), phenoxyethanol, and cetyl alcohol. "Expert-approved" products had the fewest average allergens in their ingredient lists (P=0.033), whereas products advertising "SPF" had significantly more (P<0.001). Marketing claims play a role in product sales and ratings. When recommending products, physicians should balance allergenic risk with affordability and consumer preferences.