Rationalising cross-match requests in vascular surgery is safe and cost effective.

This study describes how a vascular centre rationalised their blood transfusion policy. A multidisciplinary panel reviewed data for blood transfusion protocols and implemented improvements that were analysed. The number of units cross-matched fell from 272 to 183 over a six month period. Unused blood reduced from 80% to 61%. The study concluded that rationalisation of cross matching policies is safe and provides cost and resource benefits.

Endoscopic vein harvesting in lower extremity arterial bypass: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH) for arterial bypass surgery may be associated with lower wound complication rates than open vein harvesting (OVH), but other long-term outcomes remain controversial, and there are concerns that graft patency may be poorer after EVH compared with OVH. We conducted a systematic review of all available evidence for EVH in lower extremity arterial bypass (LEAB). METHODS: A literature search of Medline, Embase, Ovid and Cochrane databases between 1996 and 2013 was performed using the terms "endoscopic vein harvesting", "minimally invasive vein harvest", "peripheral bypass surgery", and "lower extremity bypass surgery", and detailed in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Primary outcomes were graft patency and overall wound complication rates. Secondary outcomes were wound infection, length of hospital stay, and cost-effectiveness. Summary estimates were calculated by random effects meta-analysis if sufficient data were available. RESULTS: We identified 18 cohort studies and case series, with considerable clinical heterogeneity, including 2,343 patients. Meta-analysis of six studies revealed a significantly reduced rate of primary patency after EVH (hazard ratio 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.63), with no significant difference between EVH and OVH with respect to wound infection in 12 studies (odds ratio 0.81, 95% CI 0.61-1.08). There was a lack of strong evidence to support the secondary outcomes of EVH. CONCLUSION: EVH reduces primary patency rates after LEAB, but does not demonstrate an advantage with respect to postoperative wound complications. However, the available data are heterogeneous, and uncertainty is introduced by both evolution in technology and increasing technical experience. EVH should be used with caution and in the context of formal research.

Population-based screening for the prevention of lower extremity complications in diabetes.

Diabetes-related foot disease is a major health problem leading to significant morbidity and cost. If high-risk populations could be identified and treated before they develop complications, a significant reduction in the burden of foot disease and number of amputations might be expected. We examined the evidence to support population-based screening programs. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched from January 1970 to February 2012 to identify studies assessing the impact of screening on lower limb complications in diabetes. Foot screening was defined as combined risk stratification and intervention to prevent foot complications in a population of people with diabetes mellitus. Articles reporting singularly on stratification of risk factors to predict subsequent complications but not reporting effect on minor, major and/or combined major and minor (total) amputation were excluded. Two randomized control trials were identified. These demonstrated patient benefit from screening in the setting of a general secondary care diabetes clinic and renal dialysis unit. Four before and after studies suggested benefit from primary care or regional screening. One study tried to address confounding from general improvements in the provision of diabetes foot care separately from screening. All the observational studies were prone to confounding. The evidence base for formal national primary care-based foot screening of all patients with diabetes is weak. Focused research is needed to confirm that general population-based screening in the community is effective and cost-effective. Limited evidence suggests that screening of high-risk populations of patients may be justified.

Delay influences outcome after lower limb major amputation.

AIM: To investigate if a relationship exists between hospital waiting time to major amputation and outcome. METHOD: All patients undergoing major lower limb amputation in England between April 2002 and March 2006 were identified from the Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES) data. Amputations related to trauma or malignancy were excluded. The length of wait (LOW), from date of admission to date of major amputation was calculated. A two-level regression model was used to investigate if LOW had a significant effect on recovery time and in-hospital mortality. Results were adjusted for age, sex, Charlson score, Social Deprivation, mode of intervention (bypass/angioplasty/no intervention) and mode of admission (emergency/elective). RESULTS: 14,168 major amputations were identified. 12,884 (90.9%) had no intervention prior to amputation on that admission. Length of Wait (LOW) significantly prolonged recovery in men (Exponential Estimate 1.01 1.01-1.02 p < 0.0001) and women (EE 1.02 1.01-1.02 p < 0.0001) and increased in-hospital mortality in men (OR 1.02 1.02-1.03 p < 0.0001). Risk of in-hospital death increased by 2% for each day waited. CONCLUSION: Delays in decision making or in getting a patient into the operating theatre have a negative effect on patient outcome in terms of overall length of stay and mortality after major lower limb amputation.

Centralization harnessing volume-outcome relationships in vascular surgery and aortic aneurysm care should not focus solely on threshold operative caseload.

There has been great interest in the setting of threshold operative volumes for safety to guide centralisation of vascular surgical services by healthcare commissioners. This editorial examines the evidence for designing services around a numeric safety threshold in the relationship between volume and outcome in vascular surgery. Thresholds should be aimed at the best outcomes and equity of care. Equity means access to the most up-to-date technology and all the relevant support services for elective and emergency cases. The relationship of volume and outcome with quality is complex, and demands a shift in focus to infrastructural and procedural improvements that drive high-quality services rather than the concentration of planning exclusively around an operative volume threshold.

Screened individuals' preferences in the delivery of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine preferences for service attributes in a population screened for abdominal aortic aneurysm. METHODS: A questionnaire was designed to encompass various aspects of service provision. Questions were calibrated against the time an individual was willing to travel to access specific attributes. Subjects attending an aneurysm screening programme were asked to complete a questionnaire before their screening ultrasound scan. Statistical analysis was through pairwise analysis of the median travel times with the signed rank test. The Wilcoxon rank sum, analysed by the Kruskal-Wallis test, was used to compare preference ratings. RESULTS: A total of 262 individuals were asked to complete the questionnaire; the response rate was 98.5 per cent. Approximately 92 per cent of individuals stated a willingness to travel for at least 1 h beyond their nearest hospital in order to access services with a 5 per cent lower perioperative mortality rate, a 2 per cent lower amputation or stroke rate, a high annual caseload of aneurysm repairs, and routine availability of endovascular repair. CONCLUSION: Patients attending aneurysm screening were willing to travel beyond their nearest hospital to access a service with better outcomes, higher surgical volumes and endovascular surgery.

Endovascular aneurysm repair with preservation of the internal iliac artery using the iliac branch graft device.

OBJECTIVES: Aortoiliac aneurysms comprise up to 43% of the specialist endovascular caseload. In such cases endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) requires distal extension of the aortoiliac endograft beyond the ostium of the internal iliac artery (IIA) and into the external iliac artery, conventionally necessitating the embolisation of one or both IIA. This has been associated with a wide range of complications, and the use of an Iliac Branch-graft Device (IBD) offers an appealing endovascular solution. DESIGN: Medline, trial registries, conference proceedings and article reference lists were searched to identify case series reporting IBD use. Data were extracted for review. RESULTS: Nine series have reported the use of IBD in a total of 196 patients. Technical success was 85-100%. Median operating times were 101-290min and median contrast dose was 58-208g, with no aneurysm-related mortality. Claudication developed in 12/24 patients after IBD occlusion. One type I endoleak and two type III endoleaks occurred and were managed endovascularly. Re-occlusion occurred in 24/196 patients. CONCLUSION: IBD was performed with high technical success rates and encouraging mid-term patency. Formalised risk stratification and morphological data are required to identify the group of patients who will benefit most. Cost-effectiveness appraisals are needed for this technique.

Re-interventions, readmissions and discharge destination: modern metrics for the assessment of the quality of care.

AIM: To determine whether administrative data can be used to determine metrics to inform the quality agenda. To determine the relationship between these metrics and the method of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair undertaken. METHODS: The Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data were taken for a 5-year period (01.04.2003-31.03.2008). Cases of elective AAA repair were identified. Outcomes were determined in terms of mortality, discharge destination, re-intervention rates and emergency readmission rates. The results were interpreted in light of whether AAA repair was open or endovascular and whether patients were octogenarians or younger patients. RESULTS: There were 18,060 elective AAA repairs with a mean in-hospital mortality rate of 5.9%. Of these 14,141 were open repairs with a mean mortality of 6.5% and 3919 EVAR (22%) with a mean mortality of 3.8%. EVAR patients were less likely to be discharged to ongoing care (p < 0.001) but were associated with a higher rate of re-intervention (p = 0.001) than open repairs. No differences were seen in one-year readmission rates. Octogenarians were more likely to undergo EVAR (p = 0.001), to be readmitted within 30-days (p = 0.009), to require further interventions on their index admission (p < 0.001) and less likely to be discharged home (p < 0.001) than younger patients. CONCLUSION: Administrative data can be used to identify metrics other than mortality and length of stay. These metrics might be used to inform service provision. In particular for AAA repair, differences in these outcomes were identified between open repair and EVAR and between octogenarians and younger patients.

Indications for thrombolysis in deep venous thrombosis.

OBJECTIVES: Deep venous thromboses (DVTs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the general and inpatient population. Current anticoagulation therapy is efficient in reducing thrombus propagation but does not contribute to clot lysis or prevention of post-thrombotic limb syndrome. Catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) is an alternative method for treating DVTs but there is no consensus regarding indications for its use. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and Cochrane library were searched for all articles on deep vein thrombosis and thrombolysis. REVIEW METHOD: Articles presenting data on DVT thrombolysis, DVT anticoagulation, mechanical thrombectomy, venous stenting and May-Thurner's syndrome were considered for inclusion in the review. RESULTS: CDT reduced clot burden, DVT recurrence and may prevent the formation of post-thrombotic syndrome. Indications for its use include younger individuals with a long life expectancy and few co-morbidities, limb-threatening thromboses and proximal ilio-femoral DVTs. There is a marked lack of randomised controlled trials comparing CDT-related mortality and long term outcomes compared to anticoagulation alone. The effectiveness of combined pharmaco-mechanic thrombectomy, although promising, need to be further investigated, as is the role of caval filters in preventing DVT-associated pulmonary emboli. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the outcome of CDT in DVT management are encouraging in selected patient cohorts, but further evidence is required to establish longer term benefits and cost-effectiveness.

Reducing the risk of carotid surgery: a 7-year audit of the role of monitoring and quality control assessment.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The current risk of stroke after carotid endarterectomy may be worse than reported in the international trials. Because studies have suggested that most operative strokes follow surgeon error, the aim of the current study was to audit the impact of introducing a strategy of perioperative monitoring and quality control assessment on outcome. METHODS: A total of 500 patients underwent carotid endarterectomy with intraoperative transcranial Doppler scan monitoring, completion angioscopy, and 3 hours of postoperative transcranial Doppler scan monitoring. The last of these guided selective dextran therapy in patients with high rates of postoperative embolization, which in previous series has been shown to be highly predictive of progression to thromboembolic stroke. RESULTS: Intimal flaps were repaired in 3% of patients and luminal thrombus removed in 4% of patients. The rate of intraoperative stroke was 0.2%. A total of 313 patients had more than one embolus detected postoperatively (96% within 2 hours of flow restoration), but only 22 patients had sustained embolization requiring dextran. Embolization ceased in all but one patient receiving dextran, although the dose had to be increased in seven patients (36%). One patient was unable to receive adequate dextran therapy because of severe cardiac failure. Overall, the 30-day death/stroke rate was 2.2%, no patient had a perioperative stroke because of carotid thrombosis, and the rate of ipsilateral embolic stroke was 0.8%. Most complications resulted from cardiac pathology or intracranial hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: A program of monitoring and quality control assessment has been associated with a 60% decrease in the operative risk in comparison with that observed before implementation of the protocol.

Role of magnetic resonance angiography for assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm before endoluminal repair.

BACKGROUND: A detailed knowledge of the morphology of the aorta and iliac arteries is an important prerequisite for successful endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The best method of preoperative evaluation remains to be determined. METHODS: A prospective study was undertaken between January 1994 and July 1995 to assess the ability of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), colour duplex imaging and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IA-DSA) to visualize AAA morphology. RESULTS: Eighty-two consecutive patients (64 men, 18 women) with AAA were assessed with MRA, contrast-enhanced CT, colour duplex imaging and IA-DSA. Median age was 74 (range 59-87) years and median AAA diameter was 5.7 (range 3.5-9.7) cm. Five patients were unable to tolerate CT or MRA examination. Seventy-seven patients underwent both CT and MRA. Of these, 55 also had a colour duplex scan and 32 underwent arteriography. The scans were assessed by an independent blinded observer. MRA was significantly better (P < 0.01) at visualizing AAA morphology compared with CT and colour duplex imaging. There was no statistically significant difference between MRA and arteriography. CONCLUSION: MRA is useful in patient selection for endoluminal AAA repair, as it avoids use of iodinated contrast medium and ionizing radiation.

The role of pulse-generated run-off, Doppler ultrasound and conventional arteriography in the assessment of patients prior to femorocrural bypass grafting.

One of the most important prerequisites prior to femorocrural bypass is the identification of a patent calf vessel. To determine the ability of three preoperative investigations to demonstrate patent distal vessels we compared preoperative conventional arteriography, Doppler ultrasound measurement of ankle systolic pressure (ASP) and pulse generated run-off (PGR). PGR and ASP both identified significantly more calf vessels than did preoperative conventional arteriography. However, only PGR had the ability to distinguish those vessels suitable for bypass grafting from those unsuitable for grafting. These results demonstrate that PGR is the investigation of choice prior to femorocrural bypass.

Audit of general practitioner referrals to an acute surgical unit.

One hundred and ninety referrals from general practitioners (GPs) to an acute surgical unit were audited prospectively over a 6-month period. A total of 78 admissions were considered inappropriate of whom 23 patients were thought to have needed neither surgical admission nor opinion. The estimated expenditure resulting from admissions deemed inappropriate was 25,000 pounds. The daytime commitments of more senior staff on routine emergency duty days meant they were not easily available to deal with calls concerning acute GP referrals. These admissions reduce the efficiency of the service; this may be improved by a senior member of the team accepting and screening GP calls.