Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 32(2): 92-97, 2024 Jan 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37738635

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected surgical training in the United States. We hypothesized that reported case volume during pediatric orthopaedic surgery fellowship training would decrease markedly during the 2019 to 2020 academic year, which corresponded with the COVID-19 outbreak. METHODS: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education provided nationwide case logs for accredited pediatric orthopaedic surgery fellows (2017 to 2021). Annual reported case volumes were extracted and summarized as means ± SD. Parametric tests were used to compare annual case volumes. RESULTS: A total of 149 pediatric orthopaedic fellows from 23 accredited fellowships were included. A 16% year-over-year (YoY) decrease was noted in the reported case volume during the 2019 to 2020 academic year (238 ± 80 vs. 255 ± 60, P < 0.001). Nonacute case categories had the most notable YoY percentage decreases: Soft Tissue: Transfer, Lengthen, Release (-42%); Clubfoot (-34%); and Foot and Ankle Deformity (-31%). Acute case categories had the most notable YoY percentage increases: Trauma Lower Limb (12%) and Trauma Upper Limb (10%). A subsequent 42% YoY increase was noted in the reported case volume during the 2020 to 2021 academic year. DISCUSSION: A 16% YoY decrease was noted in the reported case volume during the 2019 to 2020 academic year, which corresponded to widespread economic shutdowns during the initial COVID-19 outbreak. Nonacute cases experienced the greatest negative effect. The results from this study may inform the orthopaedic surgery community on the effect of future national emergencies, such as viral outbreaks.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Internato e Residência , Procedimentos Ortopédicos , Ortopedia , Criança , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Humanos , Ortopedia/educação , Bolsas de Estudo , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina
2.
Orthopedics ; 47(1): 57-63, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37126834

RESUMO

Currently, most surgeons pursue subspecialty fellowship training. This study answers the following questions: (1) How does the rate of fellowship training in orthopedic surgery compare with that in other surgical specialties? (2) To what extent did adoption of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accreditation change from 2013 to 2021? Orthopedic subspecialties were analyzed for total number of fellowship programs and positions in the 2013 and 2021 Match. Rates of ACGME accreditation were analyzed via chi-square tests. In 2021, orthopedic surgery had the highest rate of fellowship selection (94%) relative to general surgery (77%), ophthalmology (66%), plastic surgery (63%), and otolaryngology (55%). Across all orthopedic subspecialties, the percentage of ACGME accreditation decreased among fellowship programs (53% in 2013 to 48% in 2021, P=.166) and positions (58% in 2013 to 50% in 2021, P<.001). Orthopedic sports medicine had the highest adoption of ACGME accreditation (100%), followed by hand surgery (99%), musculoskeletal oncology (67%), and pediatric orthopedics (56%). Significant increases in the adoption of ACGME accreditation were noted for orthopedic sports medicine (93% in 2013 to 100% in 2021, P=.016) and hand surgery (81% in 2013 to 99% in 2021, P<.001). There was a significant decrease in ACGME accreditation for adult reconstructive orthopedics (40% in 2013 to 24% in 2021, P=.042), driven by the increase in unaccredited fellowship programs. Accreditation of orthopedic subspecialty fellowship training has decreased with respect to the proportion of accredited training positions. More research is needed to understand the benefits of ACGME accreditation for fellowship training in orthopedic surgery. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(1):57-63.].


Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Procedimentos Ortopédicos , Ortopedia , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Bolsas de Estudo , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Ortopedia/educação , Acreditação
3.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 31(7): 335-340, 2023 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36729747

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Orthopaedic spine surgeons gain surgical experience through cases conducted during residency and fellowship training. This study elucidates the incremental benefit in spine surgery volume from orthopaedic spine surgery fellowship training. METHODS: This was a retrospective national cohort study of orthopaedic surgery residents and orthopaedic spine surgery fellows graduating from US Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited training programs during the 2017 to 2020 academic years. Comparisons in spine surgery case volume were made with parametric tests. RESULTS: One hundred fourteen spine surgery fellows and 3,000 orthopaedic surgery residents were included. There was a 3.5-fold increase in total spine surgery cases conducted during fellowship versus residency (314 ± 129 vs. 89 ± 61, P < 0.001). Spine surgery fellows one standard deviation more than the mean reported 443 total spine cases. The largest differences between fellows and residents were Decompression (104 ± 48 vs. 28 ± 23, P < 0.001), Posterior Arthrodesis (94 ± 46 vs. 21 ± 18, P < 0.001), Anterior Arthrodesis (64 ± 31 vs. 13 ± 13, P < 0.001), and Instrumentation (43 ± 25 vs. 22 ± 12, P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Spine surgery fellowship training affords orthopaedic surgeons the opportunity to increase spine surgery case volume by over threefold. The greatest increases in case volume were reported for Decompression, Posterior Arthrodesis, Anterior Arthrodesis, and Instrumentation.


Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Cirurgiões Ortopédicos , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Bolsas de Estudo , Estudos de Coortes , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Artrodese
4.
J Orthop Res ; 41(2): 459-465, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35598278

RESUMO

The Orthopedic Research and Education Foundation (OREF) awards resident research grants to orthopedic surgery residents. Outcomes are lacking for OREF resident grant recipients including academic career choice and scholarly productivity. This was a retrospective cohort study of OREF resident grant recipients (2012-2020). The percentage of OREF resident grant recipients selecting an academic career was compared with the percentage of academic orthopedic surgeons in the United States via a χ2 test. Two hundred and seventy-six OREF resident grants were issued to 272 orthopedic surgery residents at 73 programs. OREF resident grant recipients were predominantly male (79.0%) and Caucasian (70.2%). OREF resident grant recipients had greater women representation than the national cohort of orthopedic surgery residents (21.0% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.030) with similar proportions of underrepresented racial minorities (29.8% vs. 27.2%, p = 0.351). OREF resident grants consisted of clinical (69.6%) and basic/translational science (30.4%) research and were awarded mostly for sports medicine (25.4%), trauma (18.8%), and adult reconstruction (15.9%) topics. The average h-index was 8.5 ± 9.2 resulting from 29.5 ± 51.2 manuscripts. The majority of OREF resident grant recipients selected an academic career, which was higher than the national benchmark of academic orthopedic surgeons (63.8% vs. 24.4%, p < 0.001). Two OREF resident grant recipients transitioned to National Institutes of Health research funding (0.7%). Multivariable logistical regression demonstrated two independent characteristics associated with pursuit of a future academic career: female sex (p = 0.042) and higher h-index values (p = 0.002). Procurement of OREF resident grants is associated with pursuit of an academic career. Clinical significance: There is great interest in fostering the next generation of orthopedic surgeon scientists. Results from this study demonstrate the association between receipt of an OREF resident research grant and pursuit of a future career in academic orthopedic surgery.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica , Organização do Financiamento , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Escolha da Profissão , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
5.
J Surg Res ; 283: 324-328, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36427441

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Promotion within academic surgery involves demonstrated excellence in administrative, clinical, and scholarly activities. The present study analyzes the relationship between scholarly and clinical productivity in the field of reconstructive microsurgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of microsurgery fellowship directors (MFDs). Data on clinical productivity were obtained from the American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery and scholarly productivity from Scopus. Outcomes were department annual free flap volume, number of publications, and h-index. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and nonparametric tests were used to compare continuous variables. RESULTS: Thirty-nine MFDs were included in this study. All were plastic surgery residency trained and 38% trained under the independent training pathway. Most underwent formal fellowship training in reconstructive microsurgery (89%). The top three microsurgery fellowships trained 37% of all MFDs. Twenty-five percent of MFDs trained at the institution where they ultimately became program director. Twenty percent of MFDs had an additional degree (4 MS, 2 PhD, and 1 MBA). The median number of annual free flaps performed per institution was 175 (interquartile range [IQR] 122). The median h-index was 17 (IQR 13) resulting from 48 (IQR 99) publications. There was a correlation between department annual free flap volume and h-index (r = 0.333, P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: There is a correlation between academic productivity of MFDs and the clinical productivity of their department. This study provides a benchmark for aspiring reconstructive microsurgeons.


Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Eficiência , Bolsas de Estudo , Bibliometria
6.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 30(20): 999-1004, 2022 10 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35947830

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Higher case volumes correlate with improved outcomes in total joint arthroplasty surgery. The purpose of this study was to understand the effect of adult reconstruction fellowship training on reported case volume in a contemporary cohort of orthopaedic surgeons. METHODS: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education provided case logs for orthopaedic surgery residents and adult reconstructive orthopaedic fellows from 2017 to 2018 to 2020 to 2021. Reported case volumes for total joint arthroplasty surgeries were compared using Student t tests. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-three adult reconstructive orthopaedic fellows and 3,000 orthopaedic surgery residents were included. Residents reported more total hip arthroplasty cases (98.9 ± 30 to 106.1 ± 33, 7.3% increase, P < 0.05) and total knee arthroplasty cases (126.0 ± 41 to 136.5 ± 44, 8.3% increase, P < 0.05) over the study period. On average, fellows reported 439.6 total cases: primary total knee arthroplasty, 164.9 cases (37.5%); primary total hip arthroplasty, 146.8 cases (33.4%); revision total knee arthroplasty, 35.2 cases (8.0%); revision total hip arthroplasty, 33.0 cases (7.5%); unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, 4.4 cases (1.0%); and other, 55.0 cases (12.5%). Overall, adult reconstructive orthopaedic fellowship reported between 1.7- and 2.0-fold more joint arthroplasty cases during 1 year of fellowship training than 5 years of residency ( P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Adult reconstructive orthopaedic fellowship training provides notable exposure to additional cases after residency training. The results from this study may inform prospective applicants on the effect of fellowship training in total joint arthroplasty and help establish benchmarks in case volume for independent practice.


Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Ortopedia , Adulto , Benchmarking , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Bolsas de Estudo , Humanos , Ortopedia/educação
7.
J Arthroplasty ; 37(8): 1640-1644.e2, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35390456

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 created unprecedented challenges in surgical training especially in specialties with high elective case volume. We hypothesized that case volume during total joint arthroplasty fellowship training would decrease by 25% given widespread economic shutdowns encountered during the fourth quarter of the 2019-2020 academic year. METHODS: Case logs from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education were obtained for accredited total joint arthroplasty fellowships (2017-2018 to 2020-2021). Case volumes were extracted and summarized as means ± SD. Student's t tests were used for inter-year comparisons. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty three arthroplasty fellows from 24 accredited fellowships were included. There was a 14% year-over-year decrease in total case volume during the 2019-2020 academic year (390 ± 108 vs 453 ± 128, P < .001). Case volume rebounded during the 2020-2021 academic year to 465 ± 93 (19% increase, P < .001). Case categories with the most significant percentage declines in 2019-2020 were primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA, -23%), revision total hip arthroplasty (THA, -19%), revision TKA (rTKA, -11%), and primary THA (-10%). CONCLUSION: There was a 14% overall decrease in arthroplasty case volume during the 2019-2020 academic year, which correlated with the widespread economic shutdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic. Certain elective case categories like primary TKA experienced the greatest negative impact. Results from this study may inform prospective trainees and faculty during future national emergencies.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Bolsas de Estudo , Humanos , Pandemias , Estudos Prospectivos
8.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 30(15): 721-727, 2022 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35333806

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Prospective residents interested in hand surgery must decide to apply for hand surgery fellowships sponsored by different specialties. This study compares case volumes reported during plastic surgery and orthopaedic hand surgery fellowships. METHODS: The American Council for Graduate Medical Education case logs of accredited hand surgery fellowships were analyzed for hand surgery cases (2012 to 2013 to 2020 to 2021). The reported case volume was compared by specialty. Temporal trends were described, intrapathway variabilities calculated, and interpathway differences calculated with Student t -tests. RESULTS: Two hundred plastic surgery (13%) and 1,323 orthopaedic (87%) hand surgery fellows were included. The number of orthopaedic hand surgery fellowships increased from 58 in 2012 to 2013 to 70 in 2020 to 2021 (21% increase), whereas the number of plastic surgery fellowships was stable at 16. Orthopaedic hand surgery fellows reported more hand surgery cases (764 ± 22 versus 628 ± 226), arthroscopy cases (53 ± 54 versus 23 ± 38), and miscellaneous hand surgery cases (42 ± 23 versus 31 ± 18) than plastic surgery hand fellows. Plastic surgery hand fellows reported more cases in wound closure with graft, wound reconstruction with flap, nerve injury, and vascular repair. Overall, orthopaedic surgery offered more experience in 15 case categories (58%), while plastic surgery offered more experience in five case categories (19%). Six case categories (23%) had no difference between specialties. DISCUSSION: Although orthopaedic hand surgery fellowship affords more cases overall, plastic surgery hand fellowships have unique strengths in wound reconstruction with grafts and flaps, nerve injury, and vascular repair. Ultimately, results from this study create a benchmark to improve future training opportunities for hand surgery fellows and orthopaedic surgery residents.


Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Procedimentos Ortopédicos , Ortopedia , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Bolsas de Estudo , Mãos/cirurgia , Humanos , Ortopedia/educação , Estudos Prospectivos , Estados Unidos
9.
Public Health Rep ; 135(3): 334-342, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32250708

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Non-Hispanic black (NHB) men have higher rates of chronic disease than men in other racial/ethnic groups. Poor diet quality is one risk factor for chronic disease, but research on the diet quality and nutrient intake of NHB men is sparse. The objective of this study was to describe and compare the diet quality and nutrient intake of NHB and non-Hispanic white (NHW) men in the United States. METHODS: We analyzed cross-sectional data on 5050 men (31.3% NHB, 68.7% NHW) who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) during 2007-2012. To assess diet quality, we calculated Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2010 scores from each participant's 24-hour recall data. We used logistic regression models to determine if NHB men had lower odds of meeting dietary recommendations for nutrient intake than NHW men. We used linear regression models to identify significant differences in HEI-2010 scores between NHB and NHW men. RESULTS: After adjusting for sociodemographic measures, NHB and NHW men had similar diet quality (P = .59). Compared with NHW men, NHB men had lower odds of meeting recommendations for dietary fiber and cholesterol intake and higher odds of meeting recommendations for saturated fat and sodium intake. CONCLUSION: Differences between NHB and NHW men in the intake of certain nutrients may be related to chronic disease disparities. Future research should consider racial/ethnic differences in dietary intake among men and the impact these differences have on men's health.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Dieta/estatística & dados numéricos , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Ingestão de Energia , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA