Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 29
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Gen Intern Med ; 2024 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38302811

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Policy initiatives have attempted to reduce healthcare inequalities in the USA, but evidence on whether these initiatives have reduced racial and ethnic disparities in pain treatment in primary care is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether racial and ethnic disparities in medication prescribed for pain in primary care settings have diminished over a 21-year period from 1999 to 2019. DESIGN: An annual, representative cross-sectional probability sample of visits to US primary care physicians, taken from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. PATIENTS: Pain-related visits to primary care physicians. MAIN MEASURES: Prescriptions for opioid and non-opioid analgesics. KEY RESULTS: Of 599,293 (16%) sampled visits, 94,422 were pain-related, representing a population-weighted estimate of 143 million visits made annually to primary care physicians for pain. Relative risk analysis controlling for insurance, pain type, and other potential confounds showed no difference in pain medication prescribed between Black and White patients (p = .121). However, White patients were 1.61 (95% CI 1.32-1.97) and Black patients 1.57 (95% CI 1.26-1.95) times more likely to be prescribed opioids than a more underrepresented group consisting of Asian, Native-Hawaiian/Pacific-Islander, and American-Indian/Alaska-Natives (ps < .001). Non-Hispanic/Latino patients were 1.32 (95% CI 1.18-1.45) times more likely to receive opioids for pain than Hispanic/Latino patients (p < .001). Penalized cubic spline regression found no substantive narrowing of disparities over time. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that additional intervention strategies, or better implementation of existing strategies, are needed to eliminate ethnic and racial disparities in pain treatment towards the goal of equitable healthcare.

2.
J Gen Intern Med ; 39(2): 214-221, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37698724

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite initiatives to eradicate racial inequalities in pain treatment, there is no clear picture on whether this has translated to changes in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether racial disparities in the receipt of pain medication in the emergency department have diminished over a 22-year period from 1999 to 2020. DESIGN: We used data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, an annual, cross-sectional probability sample of visits to emergency departments of non-federal general and short-stay hospitals in the USA. PATIENTS: Pain-related visits to the ED by Black or White patients. MAIN MEASURES: Prescriptions for opioid and non-opioid analgesics. KEY RESULTS: A total of 203,854 of all sampled 625,433 ED visits (35%) by Black or White patients were pain-related, translating to a population-weighted estimate of over 42 million actual visits to US emergency departments for pain annually across 1999-2020. Relative risk regression found visits by White patients were 1.26 (95% CI, 1.22-1.30; p<0.001) times more likely to result in an opioid prescription for pain compared to Black patients (40% vs. 32%). Visits by Black patients were also 1.25 (95% CI, 1.21-1.30; p<0.001) times more likely to result in non-opioid analgesics only being prescribed. Results were not substantively altered after adjusting for insurance status, type and severity of pain, geographical region, and other potential confounders. Spline regression found no evidence of meaningful change in the magnitude of racial disparities in prescribed pain medication over 22 years. CONCLUSIONS: Initiatives to create equitable healthcare do not appear to have resulted in meaningful alleviation of racial disparities in pain treatment in the emergency department.


Assuntos
Analgésicos não Narcóticos , Analgésicos Opioides , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Transversais , Padrões de Prática Médica , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde
3.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 72(16): 421-425, 2023 Apr 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37079478

RESUMO

Non-Hispanic Asian (Asian) and non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander (NHPI) persons represent growing segments of the U.S. population (1). Epidemiologic cancer studies often aggregate Asian and NHPI persons (2,3); however, because Asian and NHPI persons are culturally, geographically, and linguistically diverse (2,4), subgroup analyses might provide insights into the distribution of health outcomes. To examine the frequency and percentage of new cancer cases among 25 Asian and NHPI subgroups, CDC analyzed the most current 2015-2019 U.S. Cancer Statistics data.* The distribution of new cancer cases among Asian and NHPI subgroups differed by sex, age, cancer type, and stage at diagnosis (for screening-detected cancers). The percentage of cases diagnosed among females ranged from 47.1% to 68.2% and among persons aged <40 years, ranged from 3.1% to 20.2%. Among the 25 subgroups, the most common cancer type varied. For example, although breast cancer was the most common in 18 subgroups, lung cancer was the most common cancer among Chamoru, Micronesian race not otherwise specified (NOS), and Vietnamese persons; colorectal cancer was the most common cancer among Cambodian, Hmong, Laotian, and Papua New Guinean persons. The frequency of late-stage cancer diagnoses among all subgroups ranged from 25.7% to 40.3% (breast), 38.1% to 61.1% (cervical), 52.4% to 64.7% (colorectal), and 70.0% to 78.5% (lung). Subgroup data illustrate health disparities among Asian and NHPI persons, which might be reduced through the design and implementation of culturally and linguistically responsive cancer prevention and control programs, including programs that address social determinants of health.


Assuntos
Asiático , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico , Neoplasias , População das Ilhas do Pacífico , Feminino , Humanos , Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico/estatística & dados numéricos , População das Ilhas do Pacífico/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/etnologia , Neoplasias/patologia , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./estatística & dados numéricos , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/etnologia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência à Saúde Culturalmente Competente/etnologia
4.
Vaccine ; 41(14): 2376-2381, 2023 03 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36907737

RESUMO

The annual direct medical cost attributable to human papillomavirus (HPV) in the United States over the period 2004-2007 was estimated at $9.36 billion in 2012 (updated to 2020 dollars). The purpose of this report was to update that estimate to account for the impact of HPV vaccination on HPV-attributable disease, reductions in the frequency of cervical cancer screening, and new data on the cost per case of treating HPV-attributable cancers. Based primarily on data from the literature, we estimated the annual direct medical cost burden as the sum of the costs of cervical cancer screening and follow-up and the cost of treating HPV-attributable cancers, anogenital warts, and recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP). We estimated the total direct medical cost of HPV to be $9.01 billion annually over the period 2014-2018 (2020 U.S. dollars). Of this total cost, 55.0% was for routine cervical cancer screening and follow-up, 43.8% was for treatment of HPV-attributable cancer, and less than 2% was for treating anogenital warts and RRP. Although our updated estimate of the direct medical cost of HPV is slightly lower than the previous estimate, it would have been substantially lower had we not incorporated more recent, higher cancer treatment costs.


Assuntos
Condiloma Acuminado , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Feminino , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Papillomavirus Humano , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Condiloma Acuminado/diagnóstico , Condiloma Acuminado/epidemiologia , Condiloma Acuminado/terapia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício
5.
Asian J Psychiatr ; 79: 103375, 2023 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36470132

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To integrate all evidence derived from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of both pharmacological and nonpharmacological augmentation interventions for clozapine-resistant schizophrenia (CRS). METHODS: Six major electronic databases were systematically searched for RCTs published until July 10, 2021. The primary outcome was change in overall symptoms, and the secondary outcomes were positive and negative symptoms and acceptability. We performed random-effects network meta-analysis. Normalized entropy was calculated to examine the uncertainty of treatment ranking. RESULTS: We identified 35 RCTs (1472 patients with 23 active augmentation treatments) with a mean daily clozapine dose of 440.80 (91.27) mg for 1168.22 (710.28) days. Network meta-analysis of overall symptoms (reported as standardized mean difference; 95 % confidence interval) with consistent results indicated that mirtazapine (-4.41; -5.61, -3.21), electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) (-4.32; -5.43, -3.21), and memantine (-2.02; -3.14, -0.91) were ranked as the best three treatments. For positive symptoms, ECT (-5.18; -5.86, -4.49) was ranked the best with less uncertainty. For negative symptoms, memantine (-3.38; -4.50, -2.26), duloxetine (-3.27; -4.25, -2.29), and mirtazapine (-1.73; -2.71, -0.74) were ranked the best three treatments with less uncertainty. All antipsychotics, N-methyl d-aspartate receptor agonists, and antiepileptics were not associated with more efficacy than placebo. Compared to placebo, only amisulpride had statistically significant lower discontinuation rate (risk ratio: 0.21; 95 % CI: 0.05, 0.93). CONCLUSION: Add-on mirtazapine, ECT, and memantine were the most efficacious augmentation options for CRS. Data on other important outcomes such as cognitive functioning or quality of life were rarely reported, making further large-scale, well-designed RCTs necessary. (PROSPERO number, CRD42021262197.).


Assuntos
Antipsicóticos , Clozapina , Esquizofrenia , Humanos , Clozapina/uso terapêutico , Metanálise em Rede , Entropia , Memantina , Mirtazapina/farmacologia , Mirtazapina/uso terapêutico , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico
6.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 28(7): 910-918, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30265611

RESUMO

Background: Because cost may be a barrier to receiving mammography screening, cost sharing for "in-network" screening mammograms was eliminated in many insurance plans with implementation of the Affordable Care Act. We examined prevalence of out-of-pocket payments for screening mammography after elimination in many plans. Materials and Methods: Using 2015 National Health Interview Survey data, we examined whether women aged 50-74 years who had screening mammography within the previous year (n = 3,278) reported paying any cost for mammograms. Logistic regression models stratified by age (50-64 and 65-74 years) examined out-of-pocket payment by demographics and insurance (ages 50-64 years: private, Medicaid, other, and uninsured; ages 65-74 years: private ± Medicare, Medicare+Medicaid, Medicare Advantage, Medicare only, and other). Results: Of women aged 50-64 years, 23.5% reported payment, including 39.1% of uninsured women. Compared with that of privately insured women, payment was less likely for women with Medicaid (adjusted OR 0.17 [95% CI 0.07-0.41]) or other insurance (0.49 [0.25-0.96]) and more likely for uninsured women (1.99 [0.99-4.02]) (p < 0.001 across groups). For women aged 65-74 years, 11.9% reported payment, including 22.5% of Medicare-only beneficiaries. Compared with private ± Medicare beneficiaries, payment was less likely for Medicare+Medicaid beneficiaries (adjusted OR 0.21 [95% CI 0.06-0.73]) and more likely for Medicare-only beneficiaries (1.83 [1.01-3.32]) (p = 0.005 across groups). Conclusions: Although most women reported no payment for their most recent screening mammogram in 2015, some payment was reported by >20% of women aged 50-64 years or aged 65-74 years with Medicare only, and by almost 40% of uninsured women aged 50-64 years. Efforts are needed to understand why many women in some groups report paying out of pocket for mammograms and whether this impacts screening use.


Assuntos
Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Mamografia/economia , Mamografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/economia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Prevalência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
8.
JNCI Cancer Spectr ; 2(3)2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30596199

RESUMO

Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype influences the development of invasive cervical cancer (ICC); however, there is uncertainty regarding the association of HPV genotype with survival among ICC patients. Methods: Follow-up data were collected from 693 previously selected and HPV-typed ICC cases that were part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Cancer Registry Surveillance System. Cases were diagnosed between 1994 and 2005. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate five-year all-cause survival. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the effect of HPV genotype on survival after adjusting for demographic, tumor, and treatment characteristics. Results: Five-year all-cause survival rates varied by HPV status (HPV 16: 66.9%, HPV 18: 65.7%, HPV 31/33/45/52/58: 70.8%, other oncogenic HPV genotypes: 79.0%, nononcogenic HPV: 69.3%, HPV-negative: 54.0%). Following multivariable adjustment, no statistically significant survival differences were found for ICC patients with HPV 16-positive tumors compared with women with tumors positive for HPV 18, other oncogenic HPV types, or HPV-negative tumors. Women with detectable HPV 31/33/33/45/52/58 had a statistically significant 40% reduced hazard of death at five years (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.38 to 0.95), and women who tested positive for nononcogenic HPV genotypes had a statistically significant 57% reduced hazard of death at five years (95% CI = 0.19 to 0.96) compared with women with HPV 16 tumors. Few statistically significant differences in HPV positivity, tumor characteristics, treatment, or survival were found by race/ethnicity. Conclusions: HPV genotype statistically significantly influenced five-year survival rates among women with ICC; however, screening and HPV vaccination remain the most important factors to improve patient prognosis and prevent future cases.

9.
Am J Prev Med ; 51(1 Suppl 1): S87-98, 2016 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27320471

RESUMO

Community health workers are increasingly recognized as useful for improving health care and health outcomes for a variety of chronic conditions. Community health workers can provide social support, navigation of health systems and resources, and lay counseling. Social and cultural alignment of community health workers with the population they serve is an important aspect of community health worker intervention. Although community health worker interventions have been shown to improve patient-centered outcomes in underserved communities, these interventions have not been evaluated with sickle cell disease. Evidence from other disease areas suggests that community health worker intervention also would be effective for these patients. Sickle cell disease is complex, with a range of barriers to multifaceted care needs at the individual, family/friend, clinical organization, and community levels. Care delivery is complicated by disparities in health care: access, delivery, services, and cultural mismatches between providers and families. Current practices inadequately address or provide incomplete control of symptoms, especially pain, resulting in decreased quality of life and high medical expense. The authors propose that care and care outcomes for people with sickle cell disease could be improved through community health worker case management, social support, and health system navigation. This paper outlines implementation strategies in current use to test community health workers for sickle cell disease management in a variety of settings. National medical and advocacy efforts to develop the community health workforce for sickle cell disease management may enhance the progress and development of "best practices" for this area of community-based care.


Assuntos
Anemia Falciforme , Doença Crônica , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde/psicologia , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Gerenciamento Clínico , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia
10.
Med Care ; 54(4): 394-9, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26759983

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We examined mammography use before and after Medicare eliminated cost sharing for screening mammography in January 2011. METHODS: Using National Health Interview Survey data, we examined changes in mammography use between 2010 and 2013 among Medicare beneficiaries aged 65-74 years. Logistic regression and predictive margins were used to examine changes in use after adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: In 2013, 74.7% of women reported a mammogram within 2 years, a 3.5 percentage point increase (95% confidence interval, -0.3, 7.2) compared with 2010. Increases occurred among women aged 65-69 years, unmarried women, and women with usual sources of care and 2-5 physician visits in the prior year. After adjustment, mammography use increased in 2013 versus 2010 (74.8% vs. 71.3%, P=0.039). Interactions between year and income, insurance, race, or ethnicity were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: There was a modest increase in mammography use from 2010 to 2013 among Medicare beneficiaries aged 65-74 years, possibly consistent with an effect of eliminating Medicare cost sharing during this time. Findings suggest that eliminating cost sharing might increase use of recommended screening services.


Assuntos
Custo Compartilhado de Seguro , Mamografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/economia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Mamografia/economia , Estado Civil , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/economia , Visita a Consultório Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
11.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 39(1): 55-63, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24390274

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent to which initial therapy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer was concordant with nationally recognized guidelines using supplemented cancer registry data and what factors were associated with receipt of nonguideline-concordant care. METHODS: Initial therapy for 8229 nonmetastatic prostate cancer cases diagnosed in 2004 from cancer registries in 7 states was abstracted as part of the Centers for Disease Control's Patterns of Care Breast and Prostate Cancer study conducted during 2007 to 2009. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines version 1.2002 was used as the standard of care based on recurrence risk group and life expectancy (LE). A multivariable model was used to determine risk factors associated with receipt of nonguideline-concordant care. RESULTS: Nearly 80% with nonmetastatic prostate cancer received guideline-concordant care for initial therapy. Receipt of nonguideline-concordant care (including receiving either less aggressive therapy or more aggressive therapy than indicated) was related to older age, African American race/ethnicity, being unmarried, rural residence, and especially to being in the high recurrence risk group where receiving less aggressive therapy than indicated occurred more often than receiving more aggressive therapy (adjusted OR=4.2; 95% CL, 3.5-5.2 vs. low-risk group). Compared with life table estimates adjusted for comorbidity, physicians tended to underestimate LE. CONCLUSIONS: Receipt of less aggressive therapy than indicated among high-risk group men with >5-year LE based on life table estimates adjusted for comorbidity was a concern. Physicians may tend to underestimate 5-year survival among this group and should be alerted to the importance of recommending aggressive therapy when warranted. However, based on more recent guidelines, among those with low-risk disease, the proportion considered to be receiving less aggressive therapy than indicated may now be lower because active surveillance is now considered appropriate.


Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Braquiterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Estado Civil/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Prostatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/etnologia , Radioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , População Urbana , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos
12.
Int J Med Educ ; 6: 191-200, 2015 Dec 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26702552

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to engage wide-ranging stakeholders and develop consensus learning objectives for undergraduate and postgraduate medical education. METHODS: A UK-wide consultation garnered opinions of healthcare students, healthcare educators and other key stakeholders about environmental sustainability in medical education. The policy Delphi approach informed this study. Draft learning objectives were revised iteratively during three rounds of consultation: online questionnaire or telephone interview, face-to-face seminar and email consultation. RESULTS: Twelve draft learning objectives were developed based on review of relevant literature. In round one, 64 participants' median ratings of the learning objectives were 3.5 for relevance and 3.0 for feasibility on a Likert scale of one to four. Revisions were proposed, e.g. to highlight relevance to public health and professionalism. Thirty three participants attended round two. Conflicting opinions were explored. Added content areas included health benefits of sustainable behaviours. To enhance usability, restructuring provided three overarching learning objectives, each with subsidiary points. All participants from rounds one and two were contacted in round three, and no further edits were required. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first attempt to define consensus learning objectives for medical students about environmental sustainability. Allowing a wide range of stakeholders to comment on multiple iterations of the document stimulated their engagement with the issues raised and ownership of the resulting learning objectives.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica/normas , Currículo/normas , Educação Médica/organização & administração , Avaliação das Necessidades , Objetivos Organizacionais , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Educação Médica/normas , Educação Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos em Saúde/organização & administração , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Aprendizagem , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Estudantes de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
13.
Psychol Aging ; 30(3): 544-51, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26121288

RESUMO

Studies of happiness levels across the life span have found support for two rival hypotheses. The positivity effect states that as people get older, they increasingly attend to positive information, which implies that happiness remains stable or increases with age, whereas the U-shaped hypothesis posits a curvilinear shape resulting from a dip during midlife. Both have been presented as potentially universal hypotheses that relate to cognitive and/or biological causes. The current study examined the happiness-age relationship across 29 European nations (N = 46,301) to explore whether it is moderated by national wealth, as indexed by Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita. It was found that eudaimonic and hedonic happiness remained relatively stable across the life span only in the most affluent nations; in poorer nations, there was either a fluctuating or steady age-associated decline. These findings challenge the cultural universality of the happiness-age relationship and suggest that models of how age relates to happiness should include the socioeconomic level of analysis.


Assuntos
Envelhecimento/psicologia , Países Desenvolvidos/economia , Produto Interno Bruto/estatística & dados numéricos , Felicidade , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econômicos , Modelos Psicológicos , Filosofia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto Jovem
14.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 64(21): 591-6, 2015 Jun 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26042651

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Melanoma incidence rates have continued to increase in the United States, and risk behaviors remain high. Melanoma is responsible for the most skin cancer deaths, with about 9,000 persons dying from it each year. METHODS: CDC analyzed current (2011) melanoma incidence and mortality data, and projected melanoma incidence, mortality, and the cost of treating newly diagnosed melanomas through 2030. Finally, CDC estimated the potential melanoma cases and costs averted through 2030 if a comprehensive skin cancer prevention program was implemented in the United States. RESULTS: In 2011, the melanoma incidence rate was 19.7 per 100,000, and the death rate was 2.7 per 100,000. Incidence rates are projected to increase for white males and females through 2019. Death rates are projected to remain stable. The annual cost of treating newly diagnosed melanomas was estimated to increase from $457 million in 2011 to $1.6 billion in 2030. Implementation of a comprehensive skin cancer prevention program was estimated to avert 230,000 melanoma cases and $2.7 billion in initial year treatment costs from 2020 through 2030. CONCLUSIONS: If additional prevention efforts are not undertaken, the number of melanoma cases is projected to increase over the next 15 years, with accompanying increases in health care costs. Much of this morbidity, mortality, and health care cost can be prevented. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICE: Substantial reductions in melanoma incidence, mortality, and cost can be achieved if evidence-based comprehensive interventions that reduce ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure and increase sun protection are fully implemented and sustained.


Assuntos
Melanoma/epidemiologia , Melanoma/mortalidade , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Previsões , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Melanoma/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade/tendências , Neoplasias Cutâneas/economia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
15.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 107(6): djv086, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25925419

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study sought to determine the prevaccine type-specific prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancers in the United States to evaluate the potential impact of the HPV types in the current and newly approved 9-valent HPV vaccines. METHODS: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention partnered with seven US population-based cancer registries to obtain archival tissue for cancers diagnosed from 1993 to 2005. HPV testing was performed on 2670 case patients that were fairly representative of all participating cancer registry cases by age and sex. Demographic and clinical data were evaluated by anatomic site and HPV status. Current US cancer registry data and the detection of HPV types were used to estimate the number of cancers potentially preventable through vaccination. RESULTS: HPV DNA was detected in 90.6% of cervical, 91.1% of anal, 75.0% of vaginal, 70.1% of oropharyngeal, 68.8% of vulvar, 63.3% of penile, 32.0% of oral cavity, and 20.9% of laryngeal cancers, as well as in 98.8% of cervical cancer in situ (CCIS). A vaccine targeting HPV 16/18 potentially prevents the majority of invasive cervical (66.2%), anal (79.4%), oropharyngeal (60.2%), and vaginal (55.1%) cancers, as well as many penile (47.9%), vulvar (48.6%) cancers: 24 858 cases annually. The 9-valent vaccine also targeting HPV 31/33/45/52/58 may prevent an additional 4.2% to 18.3% of cancers: 3944 cases annually. For most cancers, younger age at diagnosis was associated with higher HPV 16/18 prevalence. With the exception of oropharyngeal cancers and CCIS, HPV 16/18 prevalence was similar across racial/ethnic groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the United States, current vaccines will reduce most HPV-associated cancers; a smaller additional reduction would be contributed by the new 9-valent vaccine.


Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus/isolamento & purificação , Neoplasias/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias/virologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/imunologia , Adulto , Idoso , Alphapapillomavirus/genética , DNA Viral/isolamento & purificação , Feminino , Papillomavirus Humano 16/isolamento & purificação , Papillomavirus Humano 18/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Neoplasias Laríngeas/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Laríngeas/virologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/virologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Penianas/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Penianas/virologia , Sistema de Registros , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Neoplasias Vulvares/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Vulvares/virologia
16.
J Cancer Surviv ; 7(1): 93-103, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23212604

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Differences in health status and behavioral risk factors may explain racial/ethnic breast cancer disparities. We examined racial/ethnic differences in health status and behaviors among female breast cancer survivors compared to females without breast cancer. METHODS: Using cross-sectional data from the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a national state-based, random sample telephone survey, we explored differences in self-rated health, obesity and selected behaviors (physical activity, smoking, alcohol use, fruit, and vegetable consumption) among females aged 18 years and older, who reported a previous breast cancer diagnosis (survivors, n = 10,035) and those who reported no breast cancer history (n = 234,375) by race/ethnicity. Adjusted prevalences of health status and behaviors, accounting for sociodemographics, comorbidities and health care access, were estimated by race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Compared to all other racial/ethnic groups, more white females reported heavy alcohol consumption and more black females reported obesity regardless of their breast cancer status. Among breast cancer survivors, more whites (33.7 %) were former smokers compared to blacks (24.5 %), "others" (20.5 %), and Hispanics (16.2 %) (p = 0.001). Racial/ethnic differences in obesity also varied by reported time since diagnosis (p value = 0.018). Among long-term survivors (diagnosed >5 years before interview), more black survivors (34.8 %) reported obesity compared to white survivors (23.0 %). Also, among "other" race survivors, long-term survivors (22.0 %) reported more obesity than survivors diagnosed less than 5 years before interview (7.8 %). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest opportunities to increase health behaviors and reduce racial disparities among breast cancer survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Engaging in healthy behaviors can play a significant role in enhancing health outcomes and quality of life of breast cancer survivors. More research is needed to better understand racial differences in obesity, smoking and alcohol consumption in order to develop effective, culturally appropriate interventions to promote a healthy lifestyle after a breast cancer diagnosis.


Assuntos
Sistema de Vigilância de Fator de Risco Comportamental , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Etnicidade/psicologia , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde/etnologia , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Sobreviventes/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Mama/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
17.
Med Care ; 50(3): 270-6, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22193416

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Whether disparities in mammography surveillance among breast cancer survivors exist by health insurance type is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To determine the association of surveillance mammography with insurance and other factors among breast cancer survivors. DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS/MEASURES: We examined mammography within the prior year among 1511 breast cancer survivors aged 30 or older and ≥1 year after diagnosis from the 2000, 2003, 2005, and 2008 National Health Interview Surveys. Insurance included private (health maintenance organization/independent practice association, other, unspecified), Medicare+private, public only (Medicare+Medicaid, other Medicare, other public), and uninsured. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with mammography, including age, race/ethnicity, education, time since diagnosis, health status, insurance, income to poverty threshold ratios, having a usual provider, and survey year. Results are presented as predictive margins. For insurance, pairwise comparisons were used to compare Medicare+private versus other groups. RESULTS: Overall 75% reported a mammogram. Mammography reporting was lower for uninsured survivors and those with only public insurance versus Medicare+private or private (50% and 68% vs. 76% and 80%, respectively; P=0.001). In each insurance group, 20% to 50% reported not receiving a mammogram. After adjustment, use remained lower for women with only public insurance versus Medicare+private (71% vs. 78%, P=0.029). Age of at least 75 years, greater time since diagnosis, and no usual provider were associated with not reporting a mammogram. CONCLUSIONS: One in 4 breast cancer survivors did not report guideline-concordant mammography surveillance. Women with only public insurance were less likely than those with Medicare+private coverage to report a mammogram. Efforts to understand barriers and promote mammography among survivors are needed.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Mamografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Sistemas Pré-Pagos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Sobreviventes/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
18.
BJU Int ; 108(11): 1913-6, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21453346

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Stone management economics is a complex issue. FURS and SWL are recognised treatment option for lower pole kidney stones. There are paucity of data comparing cost implication and effectiveness of both treatment options. Both treatment modalities are equally efficacious. FURS incurred greater cost burden compared to SWL in the UK setting. In the present economic circumstance, clinicians should also consider cost-impact, patient's preference and specific clinical indication when counselling patients for treatment. OBJECTIVE: • To compare the cost-effectiveness and outcome efficiency of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) vs intracorporeal flexible ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (FURS) for lower pole renal calculi ≤20 mm. PATIENTS AND METHODS: • Patients who had treatment for their radio-opaque lower pole renal calculi were categorized into SWL and FURS group. • The primary outcomes compared were: clinical success, stone-free, retreatment and additional procedure rate, and perceived and actual costs. • Clinical success was defined as stone-free status or asymptomatic insignificant residual fragments <3 mm. • Perceived cost was defined as the cost of procedure alone, and the actual cost included the cost of additional procedures as well as the overhead costs to result in clinical success. RESULTS: • The FURS (n= 37) and SWL (n= 51) group were comparable with respect to sex, age, stone size and the presence of ureteric stent. • The final treatment success rate (100% vs 100%), stone-free rate (64.9% vs 58.8%), retreatment rate (16.2% vs 21.6%) and auxillary procedure rate (21.6% vs 7.8%) did not differ significantly. • The mean perceived cost of each FURS and SWL procedure was similar (£249 vs £292, respectively); however, when all other costs were considered, the FURS group was significantly more costly (£2602 vs £426, P= 0.000; Mann-Whitney U-test). CONCLUSION: • SWL was efficacious and cost-effective for the treatment of lower pole renal calculi ≤20 mm.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais/terapia , Litotripsia/economia , Ureteroscopia/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Cálculos Renais/economia , Lasers de Estado Sólido , Litotripsia/efeitos adversos , Litotripsia a Laser/efeitos adversos , Litotripsia a Laser/economia , Litotripsia a Laser/instrumentação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Retratamento/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 113(2): 327-37, 2009 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18264758

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Evidence-based recommendations for routine breast cancer screening suggest that women begin mammography at age 40, although some women receive a mammogram before that age. Little is known about mammography use among younger women, especially with respect to race and ethnicity. METHODS: We used data from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey to examine racial/ethnic differences in mammography use among U.S. women ages 30-39. We examined descriptive characteristics of women who reported ever having a mammogram, and used logistic regression to estimate associations between race/ethnicity and mammography use among women at average risk for breast cancer. RESULTS: Our sample comprised 3,098 women (18% Hispanic, 13% non-Hispanic [NH] black, 69% NH white), of whom 29% reported having ever had a mammogram. NH black women were more likely than NH white women to report ever having a mammogram and receiving multiple mammograms before age 40 among women of average risk. Patterns of mammography use for Hispanic women compared to NH white women varied. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest differential utilization of mammograms by race/ethnicity among women outside current recommendations and of average risk. Future studies should examine the role of practice patterns and patient-provider communication.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Mamografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/psicologia , Fatores Etários , Ansiedade , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/etnologia , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Hispânico ou Latino/psicologia , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Cooperação do Paciente/psicologia , Relações Médico-Paciente , Risco , Autocuidado/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Branca/psicologia
20.
Cancer ; 113(10 Suppl): 2910-8, 2008 Nov 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18980274

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study examined the association between county-level measures of socioeconomic status (SES) and the incidence rate of human papillomavirus(HPV)-associated cancers, including cervical, vulvar, vaginal, anal, penile, and oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. METHODS: The authors collected data from cancer registries for site-specific invasive cancer diagnoses between 1998 and 2003, inclusive, among adults aged >20 years at the time of diagnosis. County-level variables that included education, income, and poverty status were used as factors for socioeconomic status. Measures of rural-urban status, the percentage of the population that currently smoked, and the percentage of women who reported having ever had a Papanicolaou (Pap) test were also studied. RESULTS: Lower education and higher poverty were found to be associated with increased penile, cervical, and vaginal invasive cancer incidence rates. Higher education was associated with increased incidence of vulvar cancer, male and female anal cancer, and male and female oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. Race was an independent predictor of the development of these potentially HPV-associated cancers. CONCLUSIONS: These findings illustrate the association between SES variables and the development of HPV-associated cancers. The findings also highlight the importance of considering SES factors when developing policies to increase access to medical care and reduce cancer disparities in the United States.


Assuntos
Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/virologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Classe Social , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Escolaridade , Etnicidade , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Teste de Papanicolaou , Pobreza , Grupos Raciais , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , População Rural , Fumar , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Urbana , Esfregaço Vaginal
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA