Evaluation of self-measured blood pressure monitoring in a southern rural West Virginia health system.

INTRODUCTION: At the time of the 2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey, an estimated 32.3% of adults in the US and nearly half (43.4%, 776 000) of adults in West Virginia (WV) had hypertension. Further, the Interactive Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke estimates an increase in the percentage of adults with hypertension in the US from 32.3% to 47.0%, with hypertension rates in WV rising as high as 58.7%, indicating a significant public health concern in the community. Hypertension increases the risk of several negative health outcomes, including heart disease and stroke, and leads to increased economic and chronic disease burden. Although certain unmodifiable factors (sex, age, race, ethnicity, and family history) increase the risk of developing hypertension, a healthy lifestyle - including a nutritious diet, maintaining a healthy weight, avoiding nicotine products, and participating in regular moderate physical activity - can decrease the risk of developing hypertension. Self-measured blood pressure (SMBP) monitoring, or home BP monitoring, when integrated with a provider's clinical management approach, is linked to improvements in BP management and control. This study represents a mid-point assessment of a remote SMBP monitoring program implemented by Cabin Creek Health Systems (CCHS), a federally qualified health center, and its impact on BP control. METHODS: CCHS implemented SMBP programming in March 2020 as one element of a developing comprehensive program aimed at reducing uncontrolled hypertension, and therefore chronic disease burden, in its service area and patient population. The project, funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration, continued to February 2023. This report represents a mid-point analysis and was based on the retrospective analysis of de-identified data collected for 234 patients to June 2022, who were assessed for changes in BP between the date of enrollment and the most recently available BP measurement. Patients were enrolled in the SMBP program if they exhibited current or previous indicators of uncontrolled hypertension (systolic ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic ≥90 mmHg), at the discretion of their provider, and were equipped with an iBloodPressure cellular connected home BP monitoring system, manufactured by Smart Meter. Their BP readings were documented in the integration software TimeDoc Health and electronic health record athenahealth. RESULTS: At the time of enrollment, 201 (86.0%) patients had uncontrolled hypertension, with 116 (49.6%) patients having both uncontrolled systolic (≥140 mmHg) and diastolic (≥90 mmHg) values. At follow-up, the number of patients with uncontrolled hypertension decreased from 201 to 98 (41.9%), with only 36 (15.4%) patients having both uncontrolled systolic and diastolic values. Additionally, 26 (11.1%) patients were in hypertensive crisis at the time of enrollment, and no patients remained in crisis at the time of follow-up. The number of patients with BP values in the controlled range (systolic <140 mmHg and diastolic <90 mmHg) increased from 33 (14.1%) at enrollment to 136 (58.1%) at follow-up. Overall, there was a 44.0% increase in the number of patients with BP values in the controlled range at follow-up, and a concomitant 44.1% decrease in the number of patients in the uncontrolled range. These observations were consistent across multiple demographic indicators, including clinic location, three-digit zip code, and patient sex. CONCLUSION: Systematic implementation of remote BP monitoring, when integrated into clinician workflows, was associated with a substantial reduction in the number of patients with uncontrolled hypertension in this rural federally qualified health center. Further, CCHS was successful in implementing a remote SMBP monitoring program in a community challenged with transportation insecurity, and poor cellular and broadband access, of which lessons learned are applicable to other health systems interested in pursuing comparable efforts.

A Health Plan's Formulary Led To Reduced Use Of Extended-Release Opioids But Did Not Lower Overall Opioid Use.

Many insurers are using formulary design to influence opioid prescribing, but it is unclear if these changes lead to reduced use or just substitution between opioids. We evaluated the effect of a new prior authorization process implemented in July 2015 for extended-release (ER) oxycodone by Blue Shield of California. Compared to other commercially insured Californians, among 880,000 Blue Shield enrollees, there was a 36 percent drop in monthly rates of ER opioid initiation relative to control-group members, driven entirely by decreases in ER oxycodone initiation and without any substitution toward other ER opioids. This reduction was offset by a 1.4 percent relative increase in the rate of short-acting opioid fills. There was no significant change in the overall use of any opioids prescribed, measured as morphine milligram equivalents. This suggests that though insurers can play a meaningful role in reducing the prescribing of high-risk ER opioids, a formulary change focused on ER opioids alone is insufficient to decrease total opioid prescribing.

Self-Reported California Hospital Palliative Care Program Composition, Certification, and Staffing Level Are Associated with Lower End-of-Life Medicare Utilization.

BACKGROUND: California hospitals report palliative care (PC) program characteristics to the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD), but the significance of this information is unknown. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine whether self-reported California hospital PC program characteristics are associated with lower end-of-life (EoL) Medicare utilization. DESIGN: We performed a cross-sectional study of hospitals submitting 2012 data to OSHPD and included in the 2012 Dartmouth Atlas of Healthcare (DAHC) dataset, using statistical hypothesis testing, multivariate regression, and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. SETTING/SUBJECTS: Our analysis included 203 hospitals primarily providing general medical-surgical (GMS) care. MEASUREMENTS: The following measures were available for each hospital: licensed GMS beds; type of control; presence of an inpatient or outpatient PC program; number of physicians, nurses, social workers, and chaplains on the PC team; number of PC-certified staff; percentage of Medicare decedents dying as inpatients; and average total hospital days, ICU days, and physician visits per Medicare decedent in the last six months of life. RESULTS: Investor-owned hospitals have fewer PC programs and higher EoL utilization than do nonprofit hospitals. Among nonprofit hospitals, small size (substantially fewer than 150 medical-surgical beds), or large size and having an inpatient PC program with more than three PC staff per 100 GMS beds, or an interdisciplinary PC-certified team, is associated with significantly lower EoL hospital utilization and percentage of deaths occurring in the inpatient setting. DISCUSSION: Improved program performance associated with higher staffing levels may be mediated by increased access to and earlier PC interventions. CONCLUSION: California hospital-reported PC program characteristics are associated with significantly lower inpatient utilization by Medicare decedents.

Physician organization care management capabilities associated with effective inpatient utilization management: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis.

BACKGROUND: We studied the relationship between physician organization (PO) care management capabilities and inpatient utilization in order to identify PO characteristics or capabilities associated with low inpatient bed-days per thousand. METHODS: We used fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to conduct an exploratory comparative case series study. Data about PO capabilities were collected using structured interviews with medical directors at fourteen California POs that are delegated to provide inpatient utilization management (UM) for HMO members of a California health plan. Health plan acute hospital claims from 2011 were extracted from a reporting data warehouse and used to calculate inpatient utilization statistics. Supplementary analyses were conducted using Fisher's Exact Test and Student's T-test. RESULTS: POs with low inpatient bed-days per thousand minimized length of stay and surgical admissions by actively engaging in concurrent review, discharge planning, and surgical prior authorization, and by contracting directly with hospitalists to provide UM-related services. Disease and case management were associated with lower medical admissions and readmissions, respectively, but not lower bed-days per thousand. CONCLUSIONS: Care management methods focused on managing length of stay and elective surgical admissions are associated with low bed-days per thousand in high-risk California POs delegated for inpatient UM. Reducing medical admissions alone is insufficient to achieve low bed-days per thousand. California POs with high bed-days per thousand are not applying care management best practices.

Stress and workplace productivity loss in the Heart of New Ulm project.

OBJECTIVE: The impact of stress in conjunction with lifestyle factors on workplace productivity is understudied, thus the relationship between these variables was examined. METHODS: Negative binomial regression was used to test the cross-sectional association between stress and productivity loss in a sample of 2823 adults. RESULTS: After body mass index adjustment, there was an interaction between stress and physical activity (ß ± SE = 0.002 ± 0.001, P = 0.033). Active participants with low stress had 2% estimated productivity loss, whereas active participants with high stress had more than 11% productivity loss. Other lifestyle factors were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Higher stress generally predicted greater productivity loss, but this association varied. At low stress, more activity was associated with less productivity loss. At high stress, more activity was associated with more productivity loss, perhaps indicating that individuals cope by exercising more and working less.

Comparing costs and quality of care at retail clinics with that of other medical settings for 3 common illnesses.

BACKGROUND: Retail clinics are an increasingly popular source for medical care. Concerns have been raised about the effect of these clinics on the cost, quality, and delivery of preventive care. OBJECTIVE: To compare the care received at retail clinics for 3 acute conditions with that received at other care settings. DESIGN: Claims data from 2005 and 2006 from the health plan were aggregated into care episodes (units that included initial and follow-up visits, pharmaceuticals, and ancillary tests). After 2100 episodes (700 each) were identified in which otitis media, pharyngitis, and urinary tract infection (UTI) were treated first in retail clinics, these episodes were matched with other episodes in which these illnesses were treated first in physician offices, urgent care centers, or emergency departments. SETTING: Enrollees of a large Minnesota health plan. PATIENTS: Enrollees who received care for otitis media, pharyngitis, or UTI. MEASUREMENTS: Costs per episode, performance on 14 quality indicators, and receipt of 7 preventive care services at the initial appointment or subsequent 3 months. RESULTS: Overall costs of care for episodes initiated at retail clinics were substantially lower than those of matched episodes initiated at physician offices, urgent care centers, and emergency departments ($110 vs. $166, $156, and $570, respectively; P < 0.001 for each comparison). Prescription costs were similar in retail clinics, physician offices, and urgent care centers ($21, $21, and $22), as were aggregate quality scores (63.6%, 61.0%, and 62.6%) and patient's receipt of preventive care (14.5%, 14.2%, and 13.7%) (P > 0.05 vs. retail clinics). In emergency departments, average prescription costs were higher and aggregate quality scores were significantly lower than in other settings. LIMITATIONS: A limited number of quality measures and preventive care services were studied. Despite matching, patients at different care sites might differ in their severity of illness. CONCLUSION: Retail clinics provide less costly treatment than physician offices or urgent care centers for 3 common illnesses, with no apparent adverse effect on quality of care or delivery of preventive care. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: California HealthCare Foundation.