Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Prog Orthod ; 19(1): 14, 2018 May 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29808312

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Retraction in lingual orthodontics has biomechanical differences when compared to labial orthodontics, which is not yet established. Thus, we have intended to compare the biomechanical characteristics of closed helical loop and T-loop on 1 mm activation with 30° of compensatory curvatures during retraction in lingual orthodontics. METHODS: STb lingual brackets were indirectly bonded to maxillary typhodont model that was scanned to obtain FEM model. Closed helical loop (2 × 7 mm) and T-loop (6 × 2 × 7 mm) of 0.016″ × 0.016″ TMA wire were modeled without preactivation bends. Preactivation bends at 30° were given in the software. Boundary conditions were set. The force (F) and moment (M) of both the loops were determined on 1 mm activation, using ANSYS software. M/F ratio was also calculated for both the loops. RESULTS: T-loop exerted less force, thus increased M/F ratio as compared to closed helical loop on 1 mm activation. CONCLUSIONS: When torque has to be preserved in the anterior segment during retraction in lingual orthodontics, T-loop can be preferred over closed helical loop.


Assuntos
Análise de Elementos Finitos , Desenho de Aparelho Ortodôntico , Fechamento de Espaço Ortodôntico/instrumentação , Fios Ortodônticos , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Colagem Dentária/métodos , Análise do Estresse Dentário , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Maxila , Braquetes Ortodônticos , Software , Torque
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA