Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Cardiol ; 179: 351-7, 2015 Jan 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25464485

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Left atrial (LA) fibrosis begets atrial fibrillation (AF). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) using the late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) technique might visualize the LA fibrosis and thus help to choose an appropriate strategy for treatment of AF. In this regard, we investigated whether the extent of preablation LA LGE would predict AF recurrence after ablation in a non-selected patient population. METHODS: CMR was performed in 95 patients before radiofrequency ablation of AF. An interpretable scan was available in 73 patients (age, 59 ± 8 years; men, 71%; persistent/paroxysmal AF, 55/45%). The extent of LA LGE was quantified by three established thresholding techniques. In addition, CMR was used to quantify LA volume and reservoir function. The patients were followed for AF recurrence for 1.3 ± 0.8 years. RESULTS: The arrhythmia recurred in 29 (40%) of the patients. The extent of LA LGE did not differ between paroxysmal and persistent AF and it did not predict the AF recurrence. Moreover, the extent of LA LGE did not correlate with LA volume, reservoir function and bipolar voltage. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate a limited value of a routine assessment of LA LGE before ablation of AF. Further experimental and clinical researches should be done before applying the method to a wide clinical practice.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Ablação por Cateter , Gadolínio , Átrios do Coração/patologia , Radioisótopos , Idoso , Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Meios de Contraste , Feminino , Seguimentos , Átrios do Coração/cirurgia , Humanos , Imagem Cinética por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
2.
Eur Radiol ; 16(12): 2757-67, 2006 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16896700

RESUMO

One of the recognised complications of catheter ablation is pulmonary venous stenosis. The aim of this study was to compare two methods of evaluation of pulmonary venous diameter for follow-up assessment of the above complication: (1) a linear approach evaluating two main diameters of the vein, (2) semiautomatically measured cross-sectional area (CSA). The study population consists of 29 patients. All subjects underwent contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CeMRA) of the pulmonary veins (PVs) before and after the ablation; 14 patients were also scanned 3 months later. PV diameter was evaluated from two-dimensional multiplanar reconstructions by measuring either the linear diameter or CSA. A comparison between pulmonary venous CSA and linear measurements revealed a systematic difference in absolute values. This difference was not significant when comparing the relative change CSA and quadratic approximation using linear extents (linear approach). However, a trend towards over-estimation of calibre reduction was documented for the linear approach. Using CSA assessment, significant PV stenosis was found in ten PVs (8%) shortly after ablation. Less significant PV stenosis, ranging from 20 to 50% was documented in other 18 PVs (15%). CeMRA with CSA assessment of the PVs is suitable method for evaluation of PV diameters.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Angiografia por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Estenose da Valva Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Estenose da Valva Pulmonar/etiologia , Veias Pulmonares , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Meios de Contraste , Feminino , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Masculino , Meglumina/análogos & derivados , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Compostos Organometálicos , Imagens de Fantasmas , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA