Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Glob Health ; 9(6)2024 Jun 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38844381

RESUMO

Delivering COVID-19 vaccines with 4-6 weeks shelf life remains one of Africa's most pressing challenges. The Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) leadership recognised that COVID-19 vaccines donated to many African countries were at risk of expiry considering the short shelf life on delivery in the Member States and slow vaccine uptake rates. Thus, a streamlined rapid response system, the urgent support mechanism, was developed to assist countries accelerate COVID-19 vaccine uptake. We describe the achievements and lessons learnt during implementation of the urgent support mechanism in eight African countries. An Africa CDC team was rapidly deployed to meet with the Ministry of Health of each country alerted for COVID-19 vaccine expiry and identified national implementing partners to quickly develop operational work plans and strategies to scale up the urgent use of the vaccines. The time between the initiation of alerts to the start of the implementation was typically within 2 weeks. A total of approximately 2.5 million doses of vaccines, costing $900 000, were prevented from expiration. The urgent support has also contributed to the increased COVID-19 vaccination coverage in the Member States from 16.1% at the initiation to 25.3% at the end of the urgent support. Some of the effective strategies used by the urgent support mechanism included coordination between Africa CDC and country vaccine task forces, establishment of vaccination centres, building the capacity of routine and surge health workforce, procurement and distribution of vaccine ancillaries, staff training, advocacy and sensitisation events, and use of trusted religious scriptures and community influencers to support public health messages. The urgent support mechanism demonstrated a highly optimised process and serves as a successful example for acceleration and integration of vaccination into different healthcare delivery points.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , África , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/economia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/provisão & distribuição , Estabilidade de Medicamentos , Armazenamento de Medicamentos , Participação da Comunidade , Vacinação/economia , Vacinação/métodos
2.
J Am Coll Surg ; 233(2): 177-191.e5, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33957259

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Access to safe, high-quality surgical care in sub-Saharan Africa is a critical gap. Interventions to improve surgical quality have been developed, but research on their implementation is still at a nascent stage. We retrospectively applied the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment framework to characterize the implementation of Safe Surgery 2020, a multicomponent intervention to improve surgical quality. METHODS: We used a longitudinal, qualitative research design to examine Safe Surgery 2020 in 10 health facilities in Tanzania's Lake Zone. We used documentation analysis with confirmatory key informant interviews (n = 6) to describe the exploration and preparation phases. We conducted interviews with health facility leaders and surgical team members at 1, 6, and 12 months (n = 101) post initiation to characterize the implementation phase. Data were analyzed using the constant comparison method. RESULTS: In the exploration phase, research, expert consultation, and scoping activities revealed the need for a multicomponent intervention to improve surgical quality. In the preparation phase, onsite visits identified priorities and barriers to implementation to adapt the intervention components and curriculum. In the active implementation phase, 4 themes related to the inner organizational context-vision for safe surgery, existing surgical practices, leadership support, and resilience-and 3 themes related to the intervention-innovation-value fit, holistic approach, and buy-in-facilitated or hindered implementation. Interviewees perceived improvements in teamwork and communication and intra- and inter-facility learning, and their need to deliver safe surgery evolved during the implementation period. CONCLUSIONS: Examining implementation through the exploration, preparation, implementation, and sustainment phases offers insights into the implementation of interventions to improve surgical quality and promote sustainability.


Assuntos
Medicina Baseada em Evidências/organização & administração , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/organização & administração , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/educação , Humanos , Liderança , Estudos Longitudinais , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Segurança do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cirurgiões/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/efeitos adversos , Desenvolvimento Sustentável , Tanzânia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA