Quantitative coronary computed tomography assessment for differentiating between total occlusions and severe stenoses.

BACKGROUNDS: The impact of quantitative assessment to differentiate total occlusions (TOs) from severe stenoses on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated whether quantitative characteristics assessed on CCTA could help differentiate a TO from a severe stenosis on invasive coronary angiography (ICA). METHODS: This study is a sub-analysis of the FASTTRACK CABG (NCT04142021) in which both CCTA and ICA were routinely performed. Quantitative analysis was performed with semi-automated CCTA plaque-analysis software. Blinded analysts compared TOs on CCTA, defined as a complete lack of contrast opacification within the coronary occlusion, with corresponding ICA. RESULTS: Eighty-four TOs were seen on CCTA in 59 of the 114 patients enrolled in the trial. The concordance in diagnosing a TO between ICA and CCTA was 56.0% (n â€‹= â€‹47). Compared to severe stenoses, TOs had a significantly longer lesion length (25.1 â€‹± â€‹23.0 â€‹mm vs 9.4 â€‹± â€‹11.2 â€‹mm, P â€‹< â€‹0.001). The best cut-off value to differentiate a TO from severe stenosis was a lesion length of 5.5 â€‹mm (area under the curve 0.77, 95% CI: 0.66-0.87), with a 91.1% sensitivity and 61.1% specificity. Dense calcium percentage atheroma volume (PAV) was significantly higher in TOs compared to severe stenoses (18.7 â€‹± â€‹19.6% vs. 6.6 â€‹± â€‹13.0%, P â€‹< â€‹0.001), whilst the opposite was seen for fibro-fatty PAV (31.3 â€‹± â€‹14.2% vs. 19.5 â€‹± â€‹10.5%, P â€‹< â€‹0.001). On a multivariable logistic regression analysis, lesion length (>5.5 â€‹mm) was the only parameter associated with differentiating a TO from a severe stenosis. CONCLUSION: In quantitative CCTA analysis, a lesion length >5.5 â€‹mm was the only independent predictor differentiating a TO from a severe stenosis. NCT REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04142021.

Preprocedural physiological assessment of coronary disease patterns to predict haemodynamic outcomes post-PCI.

BACKGROUND: Even with intracoronary imaging-guided stent optimisation, suboptimal haemodynamic outcomes post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can be related to residual lesions in non-stented segments. Preprocedural assessment of pathophysiological coronary artery disease (CAD) patterns could help predict the physiological response to PCI. AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between preprocedural pathophysiological haemodynamic patterns and intracoronary imaging findings, as well as their association with physiological outcomes immediately post-PCI. METHODS: Data from 206 patients with chronic coronary syndrome enrolled in the ASET-JAPAN study were analysed. Pathophysiological CAD patterns were characterised using Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio (µQFR)-derived indices acquired from pre-PCI angiograms. The diffuseness of CAD was defined by the pullback pressure gradient (PPG) index. Intracoronary imaging in stented segments after stent optimisation was also analysed. RESULTS: In the multivariable analysis, diffuse disease - defined by the pre-PCI µQFR-PPG index - was an independent factor for predicting a post-PCI µQFR <0.91 (per 0.1 decrease of PPG index, odds ratio 1.57, 95% confidence interval: 1.07-2.34; p=0.022), whereas the stent expansion index (EI) was not associated with a suboptimal post-PCI µQFR. Among vessels with an EI ≥80% and post-PCI µQFR <0.91, 84.0% of those vessels had a diffuse pattern preprocedure. There was no significant difference in EI between vessels with diffuse disease and those with focal disease. The average plaque burden in the stented segment was significantly larger in vessels with a preprocedural diffuse CAD pattern. CONCLUSIONS: A physiological diffuse pattern preprocedure was an independent factor in predicting unfavourable immediate haemodynamic outcomes post-PCI, even after stent optimisation using intracoronary imaging. Preprocedural assessment of CAD patterns could identify patients who are likely to exhibit superior immediate haemodynamic outcomes following PCI.

Incidental findings on computed tomography for preoperative assessment before transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Japanese patients.

Extra-cardiovascular incidental findings (IFs) on preoperative computed tomography (CT) are frequently observed in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) candidates. However, the backgrounds of TAVI candidates and comorbidities differ based on the race and/or country, and data on IFs in a specific population are not always applicable to another. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, type, and clinical impact of IFs in Japanese TAVI candidates. This was a retrospective, single-center, observational study. CT reports of 257 TAVI candidates were reviewed, and IFs were classified as (a) insignificant: findings that did not require further investigation, treatment, or follow-up; (b) intermediate: findings that needed to be followed up or were considered for further investigation but did not affect the planning of TAVI; and (c) significant: findings that required further investigation immediately or affected the planning of TAVI. At least one IF was found in 254 patients (98.8%). Insignificant, intermediate, and significant IFs were found in 253 (98.4%), 153 (59.5%), and 34 (13.2%) patients, respectively. Newly indicated significant IFs were found in 19 patients (7.4%). In 2 patients (0.8%), TAVI was canceled because of significant IFs. In patients who consequently underwent TAVI, the presence of significant IFs was not associated with the duration from CT performance to TAVI [28 (19-40) days vs. 27 (19-43) days, p = 0.74] and all-cause mortality during the median follow-up period of 413 (223-805) days (p = 0.44). Almost all Japanese TAVI candidates had at least one IF, and the prevalence of significant IFs was not negligible. Although the presence of significant IFs was not associated with mid-term mortality, appropriate management of IFs was considered important.