Heparin-induced lipoprotein precipitation apheresis in dyslipidemic patients: A multiparametric assessment.

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis (LA) selectively eliminates lipoproteins containing apolipoprotein B 100 (ApoB100) on patients affected by severe dyslipidemia. In addition to lowering lipids, LA is thought to exert pleiotropic effects altering a number of other compounds associated with atherosclerosis, such as pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines or pro-thrombotic factors. More knowledge needs to be gathered on the effects of LA, and particularly on its ability to modify blood components other than lipids. We performed a multiparametric assessment of the inflammatory, metabolic and proteomic profile changes after Heparin-induced lipoprotein precipitation (H.E.L.P.) apheresis on serum samples from nine dyslipidemic patients evaluating cholesterol and lipoproteins, plasma viscosity and density, metabolites, cytokines, PCSK9 levels and other proteins selectively removed after the treatment. Our results show that H.E.L.P. apheresis is effective in lowering lipoprotein and PCSK9 levels. Although not significantly, complement and inflammation-related proteins are also affected, indicating a possible transient epiphenomenon induced by the extracorporeal procedure.

Quick assessment of cell-free DNA in seminal fluid and fragment size for early non-invasive prostate cancer diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Liquid biopsy consists in the quantification and qualification of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and tumor-derived DNA (ctDNA) for cancer recognition. Recently, the characterization of seminal cfDNA (scfDNA) has been reported as a possible biomarker for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis. METHODS: Thirty patients with histologically proven PCa, 33 with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) and 21 healthy controls were enrolled. cfDNA was extracted from seminal fluid samples. cfDNA quantification and analysis were performed using Qubit ssDNA Kit and Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Statistical analysis included: Levene's test, Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Kruskal Wallis tests. RESULTS: Median cfDNA was significantly higher in PCa patients 428.45 ng/mL (173.93-1159.62) compared to BPH patients 77.4 ng/mL (18.23-501) and healthy controls 25.4 ng/mL (15.37-76.62). scfDNA fragments longer than 1000 base-pairs were more common in patients with PCa compared to those with BPH and controls. CONCLUSIONS: scfDNA concentration and fragment size differed significantly in the three groups of PCa, BPH and healthy controls. Both parameters are potential clinical biomarkers for PCa and can be used in both early diagnosis and follow-up. Using automated systems for high-throughput cfDNA quantification could improve the reproducibility of the method and facilitate the implementation of liquid biopsies in the clinical setting.

Seminal Cell-Free DNA Assessment as a Novel Prostate Cancer Biomarker.

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) includes circulating DNA fragments, which can be obtained from different human biological samples. cfDNA originates either from apoptotic and/or necrotic cells or is actively secreted by cancer cells. As yet, a quantification and size distribution assessment of seminal plasma cfDNA from prostate cancer patients has never been assessed. To discover a novel, sensitive, non-invasive biomarker of prostate cancer, through the fluorometric quantification and the electrophoretic analysis of seminal cfDNA in prostate cancer patients compared to healthy individuals. The concentration of seminal plasma cfDNA in prostate cancer patients was 2243.67 ± 1758 ng/µl, compared to 57.7 ± 4.8 ng/µl in healthy individuals (p < 0.05). Electrophoresis sites distribution patterns were different; ladder fragmentation was associated with prostate cancer patients and apoptotic electrophoretic fragmentation with healthy individuals. Human seminal fluid can be a valuable source of cfDNA in the setting of liquid biopsy procedures for the identification of novel oncological biomarkers. Seminal plasma cfDNA in prostate cancer patients is significantly more concentrated than that of age-matched, healthy controls. Fluorometric measurement and electrophoretic assessment allow a reliable quantification and characterization of seminal plasma cfDNA, which can be used routinely in prostate cancer screening programs.

BRAFp.V600E, p.V600K, and p.V600R Mutations in Malignant Melanoma: Do They Also Differ in Immunohistochemical Assessment and Clinical Features?

INTRODUCTION: Although the detection of BRAF p.V600E mutation by immunohistochemistry was clearly described in melanoma, discordant evidences were reported for the detection of p.V600K and p.V600R mutations. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of BRAFp.V600E, p.V600K, and p.V600R detection by immunohistochemistry in melanoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Immunohistochemistry with VE1 antibody was performed on 18 tissue samples of metastatic melanomas with known BRAF mutational status. RESULTS: The concordance rate of immunohistochemistry was 100% for p.V600E mutation. In contrast, the 7 p.V600K-mutated melanomas were scored as negative. p.V600K-mutated melanomas were significantly associated with older age, male sex, and worst clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Immunohistochemistry could efficaciously be adopted as a first step for the detection of BRAFp.V600E mutation in the initial selection of patients with advanced melanomas as candidates for BRAF inhibitors. It should be followed by molecular techniques in p.V600E-negative melanomas, for the specific search of p.V600K and other non-p.V600E BRAF mutations.

Fluorescence in-situ hybridization and dermoscopy in the assessment of controversial melanocytic tumors.

Although the 'gold standard' for melanoma diagnosis remains histopathological analysis, presently dermoscopists play a significant role in the diagnostic process. However, even a combined approach may not allow a clear-cut judgment on equivocal melanocytic lesions. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) can offer assistance in the evaluation of chromosome abnormalities associated with malignancies, and its role is emerging in melanoma diagnosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic role of the FISH in the assessment of controversial lesions, defined as those lesions showing discrepancies between dermatoscopic and histological evaluations. Twenty clinically and histologically ambiguous melanocytic lesions were selected. After the first histopathologic diagnosis, a second pathologist examined the specimens in a blinded review for a second opinion and to identify the most suitable areas to hybridize using probes specific to RREB1, MYB, and CCND1 genes and the centromere of chromosome 6. The first histopathological evaluation led to the diagnosis of melanoma in seven cases, whereas the second identified eight cases of malignant melanoma and was in agreement with the first in 65% of cases and with dermoscopy in 40% of cases. Cytogenetic abnormalities detected by FISH are markers of malignancy that can be useful in the characterization of difficult-to-diagnose melanocytic tumors, when the dermatologist and the pathologist have a different opinions.