The association between outpatient continuation/maintenance electroconvulsive therapy, readmission risk and total direct cost in patients with depressive, bipolar and psychotic disorders: A naturalistic retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The transdiagnostic effect of continuation/maintenance ECT (CM-ECT) across mood and psychotic disorders on hospital psychiatric readmission risk and total direct cost remains unclear. METHODS: A naturalistic retrospective analysis of 540 patients who received inpatient acute ECT treatment from May 2017 to Mar 2021 in a tertiary psychiatric institution. Patients were assessed with validated clinical rating scales pre-ECT and after the first 6 treatments of a course of inpatient acute ECT. After discharge, patients who continued with CM-ECT were compared with those not receiving CM-ECT using survival analysis of hospital readmission. Total direct cost (hospitalisation and ECT treatment cost) was also analysed. All patients were subjected to a standard post-discharge monitoring program with case managers checking in on the patients regularly after discharge and ensuring they were given an outpatient appointment within a month of discharge. RESULTS: Both cohorts had significant improvement in their rating scales scores after their first six 6 sessions of inpatient acute ECT. Patients who continued with CM-ECT after completing their inpatient acute ECT (mean number of acute ECT: N = 9.9, SD 5.3), had a significantly lower risk of readmission [adjusted hazard ratio of 0.68 (95 % CI: 0.49-0.94, p = 0.020)]. Patients who received CM-ECT also had a significantly lower average total direct cost compared to those who did not (SGD$35,259 vs SGD$61,337). For patients with mood disorders, the CM-ECT group had a significantly lower inpatient ECT cost, hospitalisation cost and total direct costs compared to those without CM-ECT. LIMITATIONS: The naturalistic study cannot prove a causal relationship between CM-ECT and reduced readmission and lower healthcare costs. CONCLUSION: CM-ECT is associated with lower readmission risks and lower total direct healthcare costs for the treatment of mood and psychotic disorders, especially for mood disorders.

Neurostimulation therapies in major depressive disorder: A decision-analytic model.

AIM: Neurostimulation techniques are effective treatments for major depressive disorders (MDD). However, the optimal sequence of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as part of antidepressant treatment algorithm is unclear. We examined the cost-effectiveness of ECT and TMS in MDD. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was developed to determine total costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for 10 strategies. Each strategy comprised four treatment lines with ECT and TMS incorporated as second, third, or fourth line. A scenario analysis that explored the cost-effectiveness of maintenance approach by continuing ECT and TMS after acute treatment was performed. RESULTS: In the base case, fourth-line TMS after three preceding trials of antidepressants was least costly at US$ 5523 yielding 1.424 QALYs. Compared with this strategy, fourth-line ECT and third-line TMS followed by ECT were cost-effective with ICERs of US$ 7601 per QALY gained and US$ 11 388 per QALY gained, respectively. In the scenario analysis where continuation treatments of ECT and TMS were provided, third-line TMS followed by ECT was cost-effective, with an ICER of US$ 17 198 per QALY gained. Effectiveness of ECT and cost of managing severe depression were influential parameters affecting the cost-effectiveness results. CONCLUSIONS: In acute treatment of MDD, fourth-line ECT was the most cost-effective strategy. In maintenance treatment, the strategy that incorporated third-line TMS and fourth-line ECT was cost-effective. The overall findings confirmed the value of neurostimulation therapies which should be offered early in the process of managing depression.

Cost-Effectiveness Modeling of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Compared to Electroconvulsive Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression in Singapore.

BACKGROUND: Compared to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), the cost-effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the management of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) remains unclear. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of rTMS vs. ECT for TRD from Singapore societal perspective. METHODS: We constructed a Markov model to project the cost and benefit of rTMS compared with ECT over one year in patients with TRD. The relative treatment effects between rTMS and ECT were obtained from meta-analyses of published trials. The effectiveness and quality of life data for patients using ECT, resource use for TRD and their associated costs were derived from the national tertiary mental institution in Singapore. RESULTS: At one year, rTMS was cost-effective relative to ECT. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) associated with ECT was Singapore dollars (SGD) 311,024 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. This exceeded the willingness-to-pay threshold of SGD 70,000 per QALY gained. A similar trend was observed for ICER per remission achieved (i.e., SGD 143,811 per remission achieved with ECT). In the subgroup analysis, rTMS was found to be less costly and more effective than ECT in nonpsychotic depressive patients. In the scenario analysis, ECT employed as an ambulatory service yielded a much smaller ICER (i.e., SGD 78,819 per QALY gained) compared to the standard inpatient setting. CONCLUSIONS: rTMS was a cost-effective treatment compared to ECT in TRD over one year. The cost-effectiveness of rTMS was attenuated when ECT was used in the outpatient setting.