Screening History and Survival Among Women With Cervical Cancer in Puerto Rico.

OBJECTIVES: Cervical cancer incidence is rising in Puerto Rico (PR). Screening for cervical cancer could prevent the occurrence of the disease or lead to its early detection, translating to survival benefits. In this study, we evaluated the association of cervical cancer screening status with tumor diagnosis and survival among Hispanic women living in PR. METHODS: We analyzed data for 506 incident cases of primary cervical cancer diagnosed from the period 2011-2014, identified through the PR Central Cancer Registry. We ascertained screening status 3 years before cervical cancer diagnosis using data from the period 2008-2014 from the PR Central Cancer Registry-Health Insurance Linkage Database. Patients were followed until 2019. Our outcomes of interest were stage at diagnosis and survival. RESULTS: Most women (78.86%) were covered by public insurance (Medicare and/or Medicaid), and 69.57% underwent screening 3 years before their diagnosis. The proportion of cases diagnosed with localized stage was significantly greater among the screened group compared with those unscreened (43.5% vs 33.1%, p < .0001). Multivariate analysis showed that women insured through Medicaid were less likely to have been screened when compared with women with private insurance (odds ratio = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.16-0.52). Five-year survival was significantly greater among screened (72%) than unscreened (54%) women (p log-rank < 0.05). The multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed that women who received screening had a 39% (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.43-0.87) lower risk of death compared with unscreened women. CONCLUSION: Our findings exemplify survival benefits among women who underwent cervical cancer screening in PR. Interventions to improve screening uptake and adherence are a public health priority.

Induction Therapy and Survival for Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Hispanic Adults from Puerto Rico.

BACKGROUND: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common type of leukemia in adults. There are no previous studies evaluating AML treatment patterns in Puerto Rico. We describe the first-line therapy patterns and survival of patients diagnosed with AML in Puerto Rico using the Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry Health Insurance Linkage Database (2011-2015). METHODS: We describe patient characteristics according to intensive, non-intensive, and non-treatment status. We used Cox proportional hazard models to evaluate the factors associated with the risk of death stratified by intensive and non-intensive therapy. For this study, 385 patients with AML were included. RESULTS: The mean age was 67 years old and 50.1% were female. Nearly half of AML patients (46.8%) received intensive treatment, 23.6% received non-intensive treatment, and 26.2% did not receive treatment. The overall 3-year survival rate was 17.9%. Among those who received intensive therapy, the risk of death among females was lower than males (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.93). Patients 60 years or older who received intensive treatment had a higher risk of death than younger patients (HR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.09-2.55). Patients with poor/adverse risk receiving intensive (HR: 3.43, 95% CI: 1.76-6.69) or non-intensive (HR: 4.32, 95% CI: 1.66-11.28) treatment had a higher risk of death than patients with a favorable risk category. CONCLUSION: Our findings are the first step to monitor the quality of care of patients with AML in Puerto Rico, particularly related to the administration of appropriate induction therapies, which is one of the most important predictors of AML survival.

Patterns of End-of-Life Care as Measured by Emergency Room Visits Among Cancer Patients in Puerto Rico.

BACKGROUND: Community palliative care (PC) services are scarce in Puerto Rico (PR). Patients with advanced cancer commonly visit the emergency department(ED) at the end of life (EoL). Recognition of patients with limited life expectancies and PC needs may improve the EoL trajectory of these patients. Our objective was to characterize ED visits of cancer patients at the EoL by examining the patterns of ED visits in PR using the PR Central Cancer Registry-Health Insurance Linkage Database (PRCCR-HILD). METHODS: The cohort consisted of patients aged ≥18 years with a primary invasive that died between 2011- 2017, with a recorded date of death, and who had insurance claims during their last three months. EoL indicators were ED visits, ED death, and hospice care use. RESULTS: The study cohort included 10,755 cancer patients. 49.6% had ≥1 ED visit, 20.3% had ≥2 ED visits, and 9.7% died in the ED. In the adjusted model, female patients (aOR 0.80; 95% CI 0.68-0.93; p-value < 0.01), patients aged ≥80 years (aOR 0.47; 95% CI 0.36-0.63; p-value < 0.01), being enrolled in Medicare (aOR 0.74; 95% CI 0.61-0.90; p-value < 0.01) or being enrolled in Medicaid/Medicare (aOR 0.76; 95% CI 0.62-0.93; p-value = 0.01) were less likely to have an ED visit the date of death. Patients with distant stage are more likely to have ED ≥ 2visits (p-value < 0.05). Conclusions: ED visits at EoL can be interpreted as poor quality cancer care and awareness of the potential of ED-initiated PC is needed in PR.

High-Intensity End-of-Life Care Among Patients With GI Cancer in Puerto Rico: A Population-Based Study.

PURPOSE: High-intensity care with undue suffering among patients with cancer at the end of life (EoL) is associated with poor quality of life. We examined the pattern and predictors of high-intensity care among patients with GI cancer in Puerto Rico. METHODS: This population-based study of data from the Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry-Health Insurance Linkage Database examined patients with GI cancer who died between 2009 and 2017. EoL care intensity indicators include the following services in the last month before death: emergency room (ER) visits, hospitalizations, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, life-extending procedures, death in an acute care setting, and the use of chemotherapy in the last 14 days. We used logistic regression models to examine factors associated with EoL care. RESULTS: Four thousand six hundred twenty-nine patients with GI cancer were included in the analysis. We found that 11.0% of patients received chemotherapy, 17.3% had > 1 hospitalization, 9.3% were in the ICU, 18.0% had > 1 ER visit, 39.3% died in an acute care setting, and 8.6% received life-extending procedures. A compound indicator of the aggressiveness of care showed that 54.5% of patients had at least one of the selected aggressive indicators. The multivariable model showed that female patients, patients ≥ 60 years of age, patients enrolled in Medicaid, patients dually eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid, and patients who survived > 1 year were less likely to receive aggressive EoL care. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the urgent need to improve EoL care in Puerto Rico. Further studies are warranted to fully understand EoL care in patients with cancer in Puerto Rico.

Incidence of thyroid cancer in Puerto Rico and the US by racial/ethnic group, 2011-2015.

BACKGROUND: Puerto Rico has the highest incidence rate of thyroid cancer (TC) in the Americas and the third highest rate worldwide. The purpose of this study was to compare the burden of TC between the population of PR and United States (US) non-Hispanic Whites (NHW), non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB), and US Hispanics (USH) during the period 2011-2015. METHODS: TC data for the period 2011-2015 was obtained from the Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry (PRCCR) and the Surveillance Epidemiology and Ends Results Program (SEER) 18 Registries Research Data. TC was categorized in: papillary carcinoma (PTC), and other TC histologic types. Data was analyzed by sex, age groups, and histologic type. Racial/ethnic differences by sex, age, and histologic types were assessed using the Standardized Rate Ratio (SRR) and its 95% CI. RESULTS: During the period 2011-2015 there were 5175 and 65,528 cases of TC diagnosed in PR and the US, respectively. The overall age-adjusted incidence rate of PTC was almost two-fold higher in PR than in the US (25.8/100,000 vs. 12.9/100,000). Among PR women, the incidence rate of PTC was 40.0/100,000 compared to 19.4/100,000 in US. PR women had 83% increased risk of being diagnosed with PTC than NHW women, a 2.25-fold increased risk than USH, and 3.45-fold increased risk than NHB women. For men, PR had 34% increased risk of being diagnosed with PTC than NHW men, 2.2-fold increased risk than USH men, and 3.2-fold higher risk than in NHB men. CONCLUSION: Further research is needed to understand this disparity in the island. This research should address the extent of overdiagnosis in PR, the role of health insurance status and insurance type, characteristics of the healthcare delivery system as well as the role of patient and environmental factors.

Effect of type of health insurance coverage on leukemia survival in adults in Puerto Rico.

OBJECTIVE: In Puerto Rico, leukemia is among the top 10 cancers in terms of incidence and mortality. The aim of the study described herein was to establish the overall leukemia survival rate in Puerto Rico and determine whether there are differences in leukemia survival by type of health insurance coverage. METHODS: Data for adult patients (aged > or = 20 years) diagnosed with leukemia were provided by the Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry. The relative survival rates (1, 3, and 5 years) were estimated for leukemia patients (diagnosed from 2004 through 2006) by type of health insurance (government health plan [GHP] or non-government health plan [NGHP]). Relative survival is defined as observed survival in the cohort divided by expected survival in the cohort. A Poisson regression model was used to analyze the relative excess risk of death for both the GHP and the NGHP groups. RESULTS: A total of 516 leukemia patients were eligible for analysis. The overall survival rates of leukemia patients in PR for 1, 3, and 5 years after diagnosis were 55.8%, 40.5%, and 34.7%, respectively. Relative survival rates were lower for patients with GHP (1 year = 52.8%; 3 years = 36.4%; 5 years = 32.2%) than they were in people with NGHP (1 year = 57.5%; 3 years = 42.8%; 5 years = 36.1%). Among patients aged 65+ years, those with GHP had a 1.58-fold (95% CI: 1.11-2.27) higher risk of death than did those patients with NGHP. CONCLUSION: Several factors could explain the disparities observed in leukemia survival rates (as grouped by health insurance status) in PR. Some of them include differences in patterns of healthcare coverage, in delays in treatment, in quality of service, in risk factors, and co-morbidities present in the older population studied.