Socioeconomic and cultural factors associated with pap smear screening among French women living in Réunion Island.

BACKGROUND: Réunion Island is a French overseas territory located in the southern Indian Ocean, with a challenging socioeconomic and multicultural context. Compared to mainland France, Réunion has an overincidence and overmortality of cervical cancer. In order to investigate these two issues, it is important to evaluate the barriers and potential levers to Pap smear screening among female inhabitants of the island. We aimed to identify the specific socio-demographic factors, cultural factors, and living conditions associated with Pap smear screening in Réunion, with a view to increasing uptake. METHODS: We conducted a Knowledge Attitude Behavior and Practices (KABP) survey on cervical cancer screening practices among women aged between 25 and 65 years old living in Réunion Island, selected using random digit dialing sampling. Data were collected using Computer Assistant Telephone Interviews. Weighted chi-squared tests and Student's t-tests were used to compare women who had up-to-date Pap smear screening with women who did not. Weighted logistic models were used to identify the factors associated with not having up-to-date screening. RESULTS: A total of 1000 women were included in the study. Of these, 88.1% had a Pap smear test during the previous three years. Factors independently associated with not being up to date were as follows: aged over 55 (AOR 2.3 [1.2-4.3]), no children (AOR 2.5 [1.4-4.3]), having free universal health coverage (AOR 1.7 [1.1-2.7]), an income per unit consumption lower than 1500€ per month (AOR 2.0 [1.1-3.7]), low health literacy (AOR 2.7 [1.7-4.1]), not consulting a general practitioner in the prior 12 months (AOR 3.6 [2.0-6.5]), and a BMI > 30 (AOR 2.6 [1.5-4.4]). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first large-scale survey focusing on recommended Pap smear screening uptake in Réunion Island. Although self-reported screening incidence was higher than in mainland France, national screening policies must take into account the island's diverse social and cultural characteristics (e.g., an ageing population, low health literacy), while implementing actions to fight against poverty and increase general access to healthcare.

Self-reported functional assessment after treatment for prostate cancer: 5-year results of the prospective cohort VICAN.

Objective: We aimed to assess the long-term association of therapeutic strategies with urinary, sexual function and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) for 5-year prostate cancer (PC) survivors. Materials & methods: The VICAN survey consisted of self-reported data prospectively collected, including living conditions, treatment side effects and quality of life (QoL) of cancer survivors. Results: Among the 434 PC survivors, 52.8% reported urinary incontinence (UI) and 55.8% reported erectile dysfunction (ED). Patients treated with radical prostatectomy with salvage radiotherapy reported significantly more UI (p = 0.014) and more ED (p = 0.012) compared with other strategies. UI was significantly associated with physical and mental health-related QoL (p = 0.045 and p = 0.049, respectively). Conclusion: Self-assessed functional outcomes 5 years after PC diagnosis remain poor and could have an impact on health-related QoL.

Patients treated for prostate cancer may have long-term consequences due to the treatment they receive ­ in particular urinary incontinence (UI) and erectile dysfunction (ED). We analyzed self-reported data from 434 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer 5 years earlier, focusing especially on treatment side effects and the impact on patient quality of life. Of these patients, 52.8% reported UI and 55.8% reported ED. Patients treated with surgery plus radiotherapy reported significantly more UI and more ED compared with other treatment strategies. We have also shown that UI has an impact on physical and mental quality of life of these patients. In conclusion, functional recovery 5 years after prostate cancer diagnosis remains poor and requires implementation of new, long-term management strategies for cancer survivors.

Correction: Cost of cancer diagnosis using next-generation sequencing targeted gene panels in routine practice: a nationwide French study.

Since the publication of the article, it has been noted that there is an error in Table 2. Where 543€ is listed in the final column of the table, this should have been written as 550€.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of haploidentical vs matched unrelated allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells transplantation in patients older than 55 years.

Due to limited donor availability, high comorbidities, and cost issues, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant is not universally accessible. The aim of this study was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of haploidentical vs matched unrelated transplant. This retrospective study included patients with hematological malignancies older than 55 years who underwent haploidentical or matched unrelated transplant between 2011 and 2013 in Marseille. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio has been calculated using the mean overall survival and the mean transplant costs. Costs were calculated using a micro-costing strategy from the hospital perspective and a time horizon at 2 years. Haploidentical transplant was considered an innovative procedure and matched unrelated transplant as the reference. Probabilistic and sensitivity analyses were performed on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. During inclusion, 29 patients underwent haploidentical transplant and 63 matched unrelated transplant. In haploidentical and matched unrelated transplant, the mean overall survival was 19.4 (1.6) months and 15.1 (1.2) months (p = 0.06), respectively, and the mean cost was 98,304 (40,872) € and 151,373 (65,742) € (p < 0.01), respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was assessed to -148,485 (-1,265,550; -64,368) € per life year gained. Among older patients suffering from hematological malignancies, haploidentical transplant seemed in our analysis to be cost-effective compared with matched unrelated transplant.

Cost of cancer diagnosis using next-generation sequencing targeted gene panels in routine practice: a nationwide French study.

It is currently unclear if next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies can be implemented in the diagnosis setting at an affordable cost. The aim of this study was to measure the total cost of performing NGS in clinical practice in France, in both germline and somatic cancer genetics.The study was performed on 15 French representative cancer molecular genetics laboratories performing NGS panels' tests. The production cost was estimated using a micro-costing method with resources consumed collected in situ in each laboratory from a healthcare provider perspective. In addition, we used a top-down methodology for specific post-sequencing steps including bioinformatics, technical validation, and biological validation. Additional non-specific costs were also included. Costs were detailed per step of the process (from the pre-analytical phase to delivery of results), and per cost driver (consumables, staff, equipment, maintenance, overheads). Sensitivity analyses were performed.The mean total cost of NGS for targeted gene panels was estimated to 607€ (±207) in somatic genetics and 550€ (±140) in germline oncogenetic analysis. Consumables were the highest cost driver of the sequencing process. The sensitivity analysis showed that a 25% reduction of consumables resulted in a 15% decrease in total NGS cost in somatic genetics, and 13% in germline analysis. Additional costs accounted for 30-32% of the total NGS costs.Beyond cost assessment considerations, the diffusion of NGS technologies will raise questions about their efficiency when compared to more targeted approaches, and their added value in a context of routine diagnosis.