Dynamics of price competition in Italian pharmaceutical off-patent market.

Introduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate, in a regulated generics market, the effect of the number of manufacturers of generic drugs on the amplitude of off-patent products price reduction and the price evolution of originators and generics after the patent expiry of pharmaceuticals dispensed by community pharmacies and reimbursed by the Italian National Health Service (INHS). Methods: The AIFA "transparency list" was utilized to select unbranded and branded off-patent drug dispensed by community pharmacies and reimbursed by the Italian National Health Service between 2012 and 2018. The unbranded drug entry in the transparency list database was considered as a proxy of its patent expiry. Results: A total of 42 different active ingredients were included in the analysis. The relative price per dose at time t of unbranded and branded drugs, considering as common denominator the price per dose a year before the patent expiry, (t-1) decreased with the increase of unbranded manufacturers. At the time of the patent expiry, the price of unbranded drugs was almost 50% less than that of branded drugs at t-1 and the price of branded drugs started to decrease before the first unbranded entry. Conclusion: An inverse relation between the number of generic drug entrants and the price of generics and originators was detected. The patent expiry determines a price decline, more concentrated in the first year of patent expiry.

The timelines for the price and reimbursement authorization in Italy 2018-2020.

Objective: This investigation aimed to guarantee the principles of transparency in public administration; to inform citizens about the time to patient access to reimbursed medicines; to assess the duration of the P&R process for the first time in the period 2018-2020; and to evaluate whether and how the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic affected the P&R activity. This study analyzed the timelines of pricing and reimbursement procedures submitted in Italy by the pharmaceutical marketing authorization holder (MAH) from 2018 to 2020. Methods: The analysis was run through an AIFA web-based platform that collects data about P&R procedures for each step of the Italian Price and Reimbursement (P&R) procedure, including dates of the Technical Scientific Committee (CTS) and Price and Reimbursement Committee (CPR) meetings from January 2018 to December 2020. On this basis, four indicators were developed relating to the completion time of each stage of the P&R negotiation process and were defined in terms of days. In this regard, descriptive analyses, graphical boxplots, and survival curves (Kaplan-Meier) were carried out, studying these indicators in relation to the typology of pharmaceutical procedures. Results: Overall, in the period 2018-2020, 57.1% of the 2,445 procedures entered were represented by the Off-patent pharmaceuticals procedures (generics, biosimilars, copies, and/or parallel trade). In 2020, the overall process duration for Off-patent pharmaceuticals procedures was equal to 129.8 average days [95% CI: (122.3-137.2)], with a median value of 108.0, whereas for In-patent pharmaceuticals procedures, it was equal to 283.1 average days [95% CI: (267.8-298.5)], with a median value of 284.0. Over time, the trend of the entire duration of the P&R process tended to decrease. In terms of estimated timing for the conclusion of each stage of the P&R negotiation process, the difference between Off-patent and In-patent pharmaceutical procedures was statistically significant by the Log-Rank test. Discussion and conclusion: This is the first study to examine the time of the P&R process in Italy, from MAH submission to the publication of the final decision in the Italian Official Journal. The time span considered is 3 years, including the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Compared to European average times, in Italy, the time necessary for evaluation, authorization for reimbursement, and definition of the price of a medicine can be considered satisfactory.

[Medicines use in Italy. 2020 OsMed National Report.] / L'uso dei farmaci in Italia. Il Rapporto Nazionale OsMed 2020.

The 2020 National Report "Medicines use in Italy", produced by the National Observatory on the Use of Medicines (OsMed) of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA), describes the Italian pharmaceutical assistance through different available information flows that allow to recompose pharmaceutical territorial and hospital assistance, concerning both the national health service and private citizens. In the Report the results of numerous analyzes, both general and focused on specific therapeutic categories and classes, relating to pharmaceutical expenditure and consumption, are reported, but it is also present an in-depth analysis about monitoring registries and conditional reimbursement agreements, and a comparison between the most relevant Italian data and those of nine other European countries.

Direct healthcare costs of chronic kidney disease management in Italy: What cost-savings can be achieved with higher biosimilar uptake and more appropriate use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents?

PURPOSE: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), are used for treating chronic kidney disease (CKD)-related anemia, contributing to CKD costs. The study was aimed at investigating direct healthcare costs of CKD patients treated with ESAs and the potential savings achievable by increasing the use of biosimilars and preventing inappropriate ESA use. METHODS: A multi-center, cohort study was conducted using claims databases of five large Italian geographic areas. Yearly mean direct healthcare costs per patient were estimated, stratifying by CKD stage. The total yearly cost and potential savings related to ESA use were estimated: (a) considering 25/50/75% of originator ESA substitution with biosimilars; (b) eliminating inappropriate ESA dispensing. RESULTS: During the study period, the ESA-related yearly mean cost represented 17% of total yearly costs in stage I-III, decreasing to 13% in stage IV-V and 6% in dialysis. Among originator users, assuming a 25% of biosimilar uptake, the annual cost-savings of ESA treatment would represent 10.5% of total ESA costs in CKD stage I-V and 7.7% in dialysis. Among incident ESA users for which hemoglobin levels were available, 9% started inappropriately ESA treatment, increasing to 62.0% during the first year of maintenance therapy. Hypothesizing prevention of the first inappropriate ESA dispensing, the total yearly cost-savings would amount to €35 772, increasing to €167 641 eliminating the inappropriate dispensing during maintenance therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Higher use of lowest cost ESA, prevention of inappropriate ESA use as well as other strategies aimed at slowing down the progressive renal impairment are essential for minimizing clinical and economic burden of CKD.

Anticancer drug prices and clinical outcomes: a cross-sectional study in Italy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the prices of new anticancer drugs correlated with their relative benefit despite negotiation. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study correlating new anticancer drugs prices with clinical outcomes. SETTING: We did a retrospective cross-sectional study including all new anticancer drugs approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) (2010-2016) and reimbursed in Italy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Information on clinical outcomes-in terms of median overall survival (OS), median progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR)-was extracted from pivotal trials as reported in the European Public Assessment Reports available on the EMA website. Cost of a full course treatment was estimated on negotiated official and discounted prices. Regression coefficients ß, their levels of significance p and the coefficients of determination R2 were estimated adjusting by tumour type. RESULTS: Overall, 30 new anticancer drugs (with 35 indications) were available for analysis. Where data on OS were available, we observed no correlation between the improvement in median OS (in weeks) and negotiated price (R2=0.067, n=16 drugs for 17 indications). When the clinical outcomes were expressed as improvements in the median PFS or ORR, 25 drugs (29 indications) were available for the analysis, and again, there was no correlation with prices (R2=0.004 and 0.006, respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our results suggest that the prices of anticancer drugs in Italy do not reflect their therapeutic benefit. Drug price negotiations, which is mandatory by law in Italy, do not seem to ensure that prices correlate with clinical benefits provided by the cancer drugs. These results call for further efforts to establish the standard determinants of drug prices available at the time of negotiation. These findings need to be confirmed in other countries where price negotiations are in place. Moreover, further investigations may verify whether outcome data obtained after drug marketing would improve the correlation between prices and therapeutic benefit.

The Role of European Healthcare Databases for Post-Marketing Drug Effectiveness, Safety and Value Evaluation: Where Does Italy Stand?

Enormous progress has been made globally in the use of evidence derived from patients' clinical information as they access their routine medical care. The value of real-world data lies in their complementary nature compared with data from randomised controlled trials: less detailed information on drug efficacy but longer observational periods and larger, more heterogeneous study populations reflecting clinical practice because individuals are included who would not usually be recruited in trials. Real-world data can be collected in various types of electronic sources, such as electronic health records, claims databases and drug or disease registries. These data sources vary in nature from country to country, according to national healthcare system structures and national policies. In Italy, a growing number of healthcare databases have been used to evaluate post-marketing drug utilisation and safety in the last two decades. The aim of this narrative review is to describe the available Italian sources of real-world data and their contribution to generating post-marketing evidence on drug use and safety. We also discuss the strengths and limitations of the most commonly used Italian healthcare databases in addressing various research questions concerning drug utilisation, comparative effectiveness and safety studies, as well as health technology assessment and other areas.

Antihypertensive drug use during pregnancy: a population based study.

PURPOSE: The study aimed at assessing if the European guideline on the use of antihypertensive drugs (AD) in pregnancy are followed in clinical practice. We also evaluated the association between the use of non-recommended drugs and individual characteristics. METHODS: This study analyzed a cohort of 86 171 singleton deliveries occurring between 2009-2010 in the Lombardy region, Italy. Women with first prescription of AD during pregnancy were considered as incident users. Methyldopa, labetalol and nifedipine were considered as "recommended drugs"; all other AD were considered as "non-recommended". Odds Ratio and 95% confidence intervals were estimated. RESULTS: Among the 1009 patients (1.2%) exposed to AD during pregnancy, 675 (66.9%) were incident users. Among the incident users, 31% received non-recommended drugs; this proportion decreased to 18% among women who started treatment in the third trimester. Women with at least four concomitant diseases had an elevated risk of receiving non-recommended drugs in pregnancy (OR 2.68; 95% CI 1.10-6.73). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to recommended antihypertensives increased during pregnancy. Nevertheless, a fraction of users that continued or began treatment with non-recommended medications was still present.

[Considerations on limits and profits of registries]. / Riflessioni e confronti sui limiti e i vantaggi dei registri.

The article collects the summary of the discussion occurred in the setting of PRIER II, in the session dedicated to the taxonomy of registries. Shown below, some specific contributions by health professionals working at the regional departments, which deal with registries, as well as the contribution on the same subject by specialists working at some pharmaceutical companies. In particular, after the presentation summarized in the article by prof. Giuseppe Costa1, the contributions, respectively by a representative of the Emilia-Romagna Region, of a health and hospital service and by the PRIER II workgroup, are following. Finally, a collective work with all participants to the working group took place to focus on all the issues considered to be crucial in defining clinical registries. At the same discussion table, institutional representatives of the regulatory national and regional branch were also invited to take into consideration the points of view of all public and private registry users, in particular in their benefits, limits and purposes. Going through the discussion on a specific check list and deepening a number of statements identified by the working group, a list of key points, essential to characterize each clinical registry, was produced.

[The role of drug registries in the post-marketing surveillance]. / I registri nella sorveglianza post-marketing dei farmaci. Un'introduzione.

The aim of this article is to provide an introduction to issue of Recenti Progressi in Medicina, devoted to the role of drug registries in the post-marketing surveillance. We first motivate the need to implement registries as a tool in promoting the appropriateness of drug use and acquiring additional information on the risk-benefit profile of drugs. Then, the different role that can be played by registries in comparison with prescription monitoring systems and observational studies is clarified. The presentation of some of the most relevant registries established in Italy since the end of the '90s, with the analysis of their strengths and weaknesses, helps to understand some of the crucial issues that should be taken into account before a new registry is adopted. Specifically, we deal with the relationship between objectives - of appropriateness, effectiveness and safety - and methods; the overlapping between drug-based registries and disease-based ones; the duration and extension of data collection, which may be either exhaustive or based on a sampling frame; the importance of ensuring the quality of the data and to minimize the number of subjects who are lost to follow-up; the importance of infrastructures, and of ad hoc funding, for the functioning of a registry; the independence in data analysis and publication of findings.

[A perspective for the role of drug registries in the post-marketing surveillance]. / Una prospettiva per i registri nella sorveglianza post-marketing dei farmaci.

Drug registries are implemented after the authorization of new products and represent a tool for systematic collection of data aimed at obtaining additional knowledge on appropriateness, effectiveness and safety. The design of registries needs to be coherent with the main objective and a study protocol is required before the implementation. A registry aimed at the appropriateness of drug use should be primarily considered for high cost drugs when there is a risk, either for the patients' safety or for public expenditure, in using the drug outside the approved indications. Since the registry is a condition for the access to drugs, and all users are included, an extremely simplified data collection is required. However, the data should be available at regional level to allow record linkage procedures with other databases for conducting outcome studies. When registries are aimed at acquiring new information on the risk profile, the duration and the regional extension of data collection should be coherent with the expected incidence of events of interest. A great attention should be devoted in preventing that patients are lost to follow-up, since the reasons for being lost are frequently associated with harmful outcomes, such as adverse drug reactions. In a registry focused on effectiveness, the main aim consists in ascertaining the reasons (the prognostic factors), for possible discrepancies between premarketing studies and clinical practice. Taking into account the greater incidence of the expected events, there are fewer reasons for extending data collection to all users, whereas the main attention should focus on quality controls and the ascertainment of confounding factors. Given the relevance of the validity issues, in the set out of a registry it is important to think about ad hoc resources and the adequacy of infrastructures. As for any epidemiological study, an adequate qualification of the researcher/clinician in charge of conducting a registry should be guaranteed, together with independence in data analysis and freedom to publish all findings.

Hepatitis B vaccination: risk-benefit profile and the role of systematic reviews in the assessment of causality of adverse events following immunisation.

Since the early 1990s, several cases of demyelinating diseases were reported in France in association with the vaccination against hepatitis B. A large scientific, regulatory, and public debate took place to reassure the growing concern of the population. The objective of this paper is to examine the decision process undertaken both in France and in Italy; to outline the main findings of the studies conducted before and after the French decision to suspend the vaccination campaign among adolescents; and to describe the contribution of systematic review and causality criteria in the evaluation of the risk-benefit profile of vaccines. Even on the basis of the early findings, which appeared to be compatible with a low increase in the risk associated with the vaccination, it was apparent that the risk-benefit profile was unchanged for newborns, and was essentially unchanged for adolescents and for high-risk adults. The availability of subsequent negative association studies provided further reassurance. It is essential to rely on well-conducted systematic reviews to produce valid and reliable estimates of the risk-benefit profile.