A survey of United States obstetric anesthesiologists' perceived value of obstetric anesthesiology fellowship.

INTRODUCTION: Subspecialty training in obstetric anesthesiology is associated with improved patient outcomes and reduced anesthesia-related morbidity and mortality. Despite this, the demand for fellowship-trained obstetric anesthesiologists far exceeds the supply. This survey study aimed to evaluate the perceived value of obstetric anesthesiology subspecialty training on career trajectory, job satisfaction, quality of life, and job autonomy. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, we conducted a cross-sectional study of fellowship-trained obstetric anesthesiologists in the United States of America. In March and April 2022, program directors of obstetric anesthesiology fellowships distributed an electronic survey link containing 29 multiple-choice questions to their program alumni. Survey content included respondent demographic characteristics, practice models, career information, and perceived value of an obstetric anesthesiology fellowship. RESULTS: We surveyed 217/502 (43%) fellowship-trained obstetric anesthesiologists with a response rate of 158/217 (73%). Most worked in urban, academic, and level IV perinatal health centers. The majority believed an obstetric anesthesiology fellowship was "extremely beneficial" (77%), enhanced quality of life (84%), improved the quality of patient care (99%), and was influential in helping obtain their first post-training job (86%). The perceived value of the fellowship included an enhanced career trajectory, a sense of purpose, improved job satisfaction, a sense of work community, lower burnout, involvement in maternal health initiatives, increased mentorship, and departmental leadership. CONCLUSION: In this survey study, fellowship-trained obstetric anesthesiologists perceived a positive impact of fellowship training on career trajectory, job protection and autonomy, quality of life, and job satisfaction. This information may be meaningful to trainees considering pursuing a fellowship and a career in obstetric anesthesiology.

Lack of caregivers limits use of outpatient hematopoietic stem cell transplant program.

Our goal was to compare direct and indirect medical costs and quality of life associated with inpatient vs outpatient autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AuHSCT). Twenty-one sequential outpatients and 26 inpatients were enrolled on this prospective trial. All candidates for AuHSCT were screened for eligibility for outpatient transplantation. Patients with either breast cancer or hematologic malignancy, insurance coverage for the outpatient procedure, one to three caregivers available to provide 24 h coverage, and no significant comorbidities were eligible to participate. Patients without caregivers or insurance coverage for outpatient transplant were accrued to the study in a consecutive manner as inpatient controls, based on willingness to participate in the quality of life portion of the study and to permit review of their hospital and billing records. Approximately half of all 139 prospective outpatient candidates were ineligible because they lacked a caregiver. Most commonly, the patient without a caregiver was single or widowed or their family and friends were needed to provide childcare. Most caregivers were college educated from families with incomes greater than US dollars 80000. Indirect costs to the caregivers totaled a median of US dollars 2520 (range US dollars 684-US dollars 4508), with the majority attributed to lost 'opportunity costs'. Overall, there were significant differences in the total costs of treatment for inpatient vs outpatient AuHSCT (US dollars 40985 vs US dollars 29210, P < 0.01)). In general, no significant differences were detected between inpatient and outpatient scores on quality of life measures. Although significant cost savings were associated with outpatient transplantation, this approach was applicable to only half of our otherwise eligible candidates because of a lack of caregivers. The financial burden associated with the caretaking role may underlie this finding.