FISH for MYC amplification and anti-MYC immunohistochemistry: useful diagnostic tools in the assessment of secondary angiosarcoma and atypical vascular proliferations.

BACKGROUND: Secondary angiosarcoma and benign but microscopically atypical vascular proliferations (herein referred to as atypical vascular lesion or AVL) are rare consequences of radiation therapy and/or chronic lymphedema most commonly seen in breast cancer patients. Differentiating angiosarcoma from AVL can be difficult due to overlapping clinical and microscopic features. Recently, amplification of MYC has been associated with 55-100% of secondary angiosarcomas but is reportedly absent in AVL. We examined a series of secondary angiosarcoma and AVL for MYC amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and expression by immunohistochemistry to investigate the diagnostic utility for discriminating angiosarcoma from AVL. METHODS: Cases of secondary angiosarcoma (n = 8) and AVL (n = 4) were retrieved from our archives and examined by FISH and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: All angiosarcoma cases (8/8 = 100%) demonstrated high-level MYC amplification by FISH, whereas all AVLs (0/4 = 0%) were negative for MYC amplification. Additionally, all angiosarcoma cases (8/8 = 100%) demonstrated nuclear positivity for MYC, whereas all AVLs (0/4 = 0%) were negative. CONCLUSION: Amplification of MYC and nuclear expression of MYC is present in secondary angiosarcoma but not AVL. These ancillary tests can be useful to distinguish angiosarcoma from AVL in difficult cases.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as primary methodology for the assessment of HER2 Status in adenocarcinoma of the breast: a single institution experience.

The demand for both reflexed and primary fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) testing in the clinical setting is increasing. Relevant literature has reported the incidence of HER2 overexpression in 20% to 30% of cases, but some reports suggest that HER2 gene amplification rates are substantially lower. Published data, however, on primary FISH assessment from a single institution is limited, especially information about the frequency of the anomalous genotypes defined by FISH. We report our experience with primary FISH testing in 742 consecutive cases of breast cancer, in the calendar year 2006. Eighty percent (595/742) of the breast cancer cases were not amplified for HER2 (HER2/CEP17=0.8-1.9), whereas 19% (142/742) of cases were HER2 amplified (HER2/CEP17>or=2.0). Among the HER2-amplified cases, 3% (19/742) were low-level amplified (HER2/CEP17 ratio=2.0-2.5). Genotypic heterogeneity, defined as >5% but <50% of the tumor cells demonstrating HER2 gene amplification, was observed in 5% (40/7242) of the cases. HER2 monoallelic deletion (HER2/CEP1780% of tumor cells) was observed in 2% (13/742). Polysomy, if defined as CEP17 spot count 3.0 or more in at least 80% of tumor cells, was observed in 3% (20/742) of the cases. These data may be helpful as benchmarks for other institutions initiating primary FISH analysis for HER2 genotyping.

Assessment of the HER2 status in breast cancer by fluorescence in situ hybridization: a technical review with interpretive guidelines.

Diagnostic assays for HER2 in breast cancer provide important prognostic information and independently help guide management by identifying patients who are the most likely to benefit from Herceptin-targeted therapy. The biological events underlying HER2 -driven breast cancer that can be assessed in routine clinical specimens include the evaluation of gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), enhanced messenger RNA expression by real-time polymerase chain reaction, and the assessment of protein overexpression at the tumor cell membrane by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Immunohistochemistry and FISH methodologies have the advantage of being morphologically driven, allowing for correlations between HER2 expression and morphologic features. However, each has important advantages and disadvantages, which are discussed in detail. Although immunohistochemistry is familiar and readily accommodated in most surgical pathology laboratories, increasing demands for FISH testing in the clinical setting will require greater familiarity with the technical aspects of FISH assays and their interpretation by the greater laboratory community. In this review, we provide an overview of FISH testing for HER2 in breast cancer, with an emphasis on technical considerations, interpretive guidelines, scoring criteria, and quality control. The development of automated platforms for hybridization, image analysis for signal enumeration, and experience with FISH interpretation should broaden the availability of this technology for clinical diagnostic testing.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the stomach: assessment of microsatellite instability, allelic imbalance, and trisomy of chromosomes 3, 12, and 18.

Several types of genetic aberrations including microsatellite instability (MSI), allelic imbalance (AI), and chromosomal trisomies have been reported in low-grade (LG) mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT)-type gastric lymphomas. Presence of such genetic alterations could be a discriminator between de novo large cell lymphoma and high-grade (HG) MALT-type lymphoma. We investigated 17 primary gastric large B-cell lymphomas with and without features of MALT-type lymphoma for MSI, AI, and presence of trisomy of chromosomes 3, 12, and 18. We studied resection specimens from 17 primary gastric extranodal diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Cases classified as HG MALT-type lymphoma, based on either the presence of LG MALT-type lymphoma component in the background (L/H MALT) or large cell lymphoepithelial lesions (HG MALT), and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL-NOS) when no features of MALT were present. MSI was analyzed using fluorescently labeled polymerase chain reaction primers (D3S11, D6S262, D3S1261, D3S1262, D3S1265). Paired tumor and normal DNA samples were amplified, and PCR products were analyzed on a DNA sequencer (ABI PRISM 373XL) with GeneScan (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). MSI was defined as a gain of a novel-length allele compared with the corresponding normal tissue. AI was assessed at locus 3q27 (D3S1262 and D3S1265). The cases were analyzed for the presence of trisomy of chromosomes 3, 12, and 18 using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization. MSI was detected in 4 out of 15 (27%) cases from which DNA was amplifiable with all primers and all MALT-type lymphomas. In two cases (13%), MSI was present at two loci sufficient to be classified as high-frequency MSI (MSI-H); this was seen exclusively in HG MALT lymphomas (P = 0.04). In the remaining two cases, MSI was detected at a single locus (low-frequency MSI). Allelic imbalance at the locus D3S1262 was detected in 4 out of 17 (24%) cases. It occurred more commonly in stage IE lymphomas when compared with higher stages (P = 0.03), regardless of lymphoma subtype. Trisomy 12 was detected in 3 out of 17 cases (18%) exclusively in stage IE lymphomas (P = 0.08). MSI was uncommon and was found exclusively in MALT-type lymphomas. MSI-H was even less common but occurred in HG MALT lymphomas only. Allelic imbalance at 3q27 (D3S1262) and trisomy 12 were found more commonly in low-stage disease. The latter two findings are in concordance with the recent suggestion that the published variation in gain of chromosomal material in high-grade gastric lymphomas may be related to stage rather than to the subtype of lymphoma. Because of the relatively low frequency of MSI in the high-grade B-cell lymphomas of the stomach, this feature cannot be used to reliably discriminate between the histologic types of extranodal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.