The intra-gastric balloon for pre-operative weight loss in bariatric surgery: is it worthwhile?

BACKGROUND: Super-obese patients in NHS Lothian during 2009-2010 were offered the intragastric balloon to assist with weight loss prior to definitive bariatric surgery along with participation in a structured weight management programme. Those who declined balloon placement continued to receive weight management alone (WM). The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the structured weight management programme with and without the addition of the intragastric balloon. METHODS: Patients referred to the NHS Lothian Bariatric Service in 2009 with BMI > 55 kg/m(2) or weight > 200 kg and assessed as otherwise eligible for bariatric surgery were offered structured weight management with or without placement of an intragastric balloon with the aim of achieving a target of 10 % excess weight loss (EWL) over 6 months. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were recruited. Fifteen opted for balloon placement and 13 declined. Three patients in the balloon group required early balloon removal due to intolerance and three dropped out of the WM group through non-attendance. Of those remaining, two in the balloon group and three in the WM group failed to achieve the 10 % EWL target. Overall, median %EWL was 17.1 % for the balloon group and 16.1 % for the WM group (p = 0.295, Mann-Witney U-test). CONCLUSIONS: The additional use of intragastric balloon conferred no benefit over structured weight management alone in achieving pre-operative weight loss in a super-obese patient population. In the context of limited resources within NHS Lothian, the continued use of intragastric balloon in this way cannot be justified.

Breast cancer management: a rural perspective.

Audit of a general surgical practice in the rural Victorian town of Echuca identified 28 new patients with breast cancer between September 1992 and August 1995 (10% of those with breast conditions). The rural setting was no impediment to breast conservation (achieved in 68% of the 25 who had surgery) or to a multidisciplinary approach (management was planned in conjunction with an oncologist and/or specialist breast surgeon for 26 of the 28 patients).

Heparin thromboprophylaxis via indwelling subcutaneous teflon cannula.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the administration of postoperative heparin thromboprophylaxis via an indwelling subcutaneous cannula. Fifty consecutive patients undergoing laparotomy, laparoscopy or varicose vein surgery were studied. Each patient on admission had a 24 gauge subcutaneous cannula inserted and a conventional subcutaneous heparin injection preoperatively. The first 20 patients received an alternating postoperative regimen of morning heparin via cannula and evening heparin via conventional injection into the abdominal wall. The remaining 30 patients received postoperative heparin twice daily via the cannula. Patients and nursing staff were interviewed and their preference for either method was recorded. There were no significant complications with the cannula system. Although it was more costly and nursing staff found it more labour intensive than conventional subcutaneous injections, the majority of patients preferred to receive heparin via the cannula. We conclude that this is an excellent method of administering prophylactic subcutaneous heparin, especially for patients with a strong aversion to injections.

Use of the Injury Severity Score to monitor diagnostic accuracy in the early assessment of road trauma.

A retrospective review of 279 hospital admissions at two Melbourne hospitals was conducted to develop a method for identifying diagnostic error using the Injury Severity Score (ISS) as a model for clinical audit. Two scores were calculated for each patient, the first according to injuries diagnosed on initial assessment in the Emergency Department and the second according to final, confirmed diagnoses upon discharge from hospital. Diagnostic errors were identified as discrepancies between the initial and final scores. ISS discrepancies were found in 48 cases (17.2%). Some were clinically significant errors of diagnosis while others reflected inaccurate injury description or record keeping. Abdominal injuries were the most frequently missed, followed in decreasing order by spinal, thoracic, extremities (limbs), head/face and external injuries (skin and subcutaneous tissues). The frequency and pattern of injury misdiagnosis concurs with the findings of other studies. The diagnostic error rate was found to increase with injury severity and with the number of anatomic body regions involved. The authors suggest that comparing initial and final ISS provides a convenient mechanism for the audit of early diagnosis in trauma cases.