Factors affecting patient safety culture in a university hospital under the universal health insurance system: A cross-sectional study from Japan.

We conducted a cross-sectional study of patient safety culture aimed at examining the factors that influence patient safety culture in university hospitals under a universal health insurance system. The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality was used. The survey was distributed to 1066 hospital employees, and 864 responded. The confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit of the results to the 12-composites model. The highest positive response rates were for "(1) Teamwork within units" (81%) and "(2) Supervisor/manager expectations and actions promoting patient safety" (80%), and the lowest was for "(10) Staffing" (36%). Hayashi's quantification theory type 2 revealed that working hours per week had the greatest negative impact on patient safety culture. Under a universal health insurance system, workload and human resources might have a significant impact on the patient safety culture.

Surgical Experience Disparity Between Male and Female Surgeons in Japan.

Importance: Women are vastly underrepresented in surgical leadership and management in Japan. The lack of equal opportunities for surgical training is speculated to be the main reason for this disparity; however, this hypothesis has not been investigated thus far. Objective: To examine gender disparity in the number of surgical experiences among Japanese surgeons. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, multicenter cross-sectional study used data from the National Clinical Database, which contains more than 95% of all surgical procedures in Japan. Participants included male and female gastroenterological surgeons who performed appendectomy, cholecystectomy, right hemicolectomy, distal gastrectomy, low anterior resection, and pancreaticoduodenectomy between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2017. Exposures: Differences in the number of surgical experiences between male and female surgeons. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were the total number of operations and number of operations per surgeon by gender and years of experience. Data were analyzed from March 18 to August 31, 2021. Results: Of 1 147 068 total operations, 83 354 (7.27%) were performed by female surgeons and 1 063 714 (92.73%) by male surgeons. Among the 6 operative procedures, the percentage of operations performed by female surgeons were the highest for appendectomy (n = 20 648 [9.83%]) and cholecystectomy (n = 41 271 [7.89%]) and lowest for low anterior resection (n = 4507 [4.57%]) and pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 1329 [2.64%]). Regarding the number of operations per surgeon, female surgeons had fewer surgical experiences for all 6 types of operations in all years after registration, except for appendectomy and cholecystectomy in the first 2 years after medical registration. The largest gender disparity for each surgical procedure was 3.17 times more procedures for male vs female surgeons for appendectomy (at 15 years after medical registration), 4.93 times for cholecystectomy (at 30-39 years), 3.65 times for right hemicolectomy (at 30-39 years), 3.02 times for distal gastrectomy (at 27-29 years), 6.75 times for low anterior resection (at 27-29 years), and 22.2 times for pancreaticoduodenectomy (at 30-39 years). Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found that female surgeons had less surgical experience than male surgeons in Japan, and this gap tended to widen with an increase in years of experience, especially for medium- and high-difficulty operations. Gender disparity in surgical experience needs to be eliminated, so that female surgeons can advance to leadership positions.

Probability of target attainment of oral antimicrobials for Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae based on Monte Carlo simulations.

Although early transition from intravenous to oral antimicrobials can reduce hospitalization duration, susceptibility breakpoints have not been established for many oral antimicrobials against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia. Thus, we used population pharmacokinetic models, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indices, and Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the probability of target attainment (PTA) for common oral antimicrobial dosages against E. coli and K. pneumoniae. The oral antimicrobial agents evaluated included cephalexin, cefaclor, cefditoren, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, faropenem, and levofloxacin. For E. coli, the percentage of isolates with minimum inhibitory concentrations for which a PTA >90% was achieved was 53% and less than 20% for levofloxacin and the ß-lactams, respectively. For K. pneumoniae, the percentages of isolates for which a PTA >90% was achieved were comparatively higher (cephalexin, 73%; amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, 83%; levofloxacin, 96%). Our results suggest clinicians should check if pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indices are achieved in individual patients before transitioning to oral antimicrobial therapy.

Endoscopic Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapeutic Efficacy in Gastric Cancer before Gastrectomy Might be as Useful as Histological Assessment after Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer is expected to improve prognoses. However, as there is no method to evaluate neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic efficacy before gastrectomy, some patients at high risk for a poor prognosis undergo gastrectomy. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether endoscopy could be useful for assessing the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we analyzed the data of 41 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy at our institution to investigate whether responsiveness to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as assessed with endoscopy, can serve as a surrogate marker for histological grades 1b or higher in the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma (JCGC) scheme. RESULTS: There were 32 (78.0%) responders and 9 (22.0%) nonresponders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as observed in endoscopic evaluations. Among the endoscopic responders, 24 (75.0%) had cancer of histological grade 1b or higher, and 15 (46.9%) had cancer of grade 2 or higher. Among the endoscopic nonresponders, 1 (11.1%) patient had histological grade 1b cancer. Compared with endoscopic nonresponders, endoscopic responders were more likely to show a histological response (chi-square test: p = 0.0005 for JCGC grade 1b or higher; p = 0.0099 for JCGC grade 2 or higher). CONCLUSIONS: Most endoscopic responders showed JCGC histological responses. Evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic efficacy by endoscopy in gastric cancer may be useful before gastrectomy. As this was a retrospective study, further investigations are required. The protocol was approved by the ethics review committee at Osaka Medical College (No. 2422) and was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000033088).

Exploring the use of single-port surgery in the conservative management of hepatic portal vein gas: A case report.

RATIONALE: Hepatic portal vein gas (HPVG) is known as a sign of a lethal condition resulting from bowel necrosis. Recently, the detection rate of non-life-threatening cases of HPVG has increased due to the technological development of imaging, i.e., computed tomography (CT). However, it is difficult to determine accurately whether surgical treatment is necessary because of its lethal potential. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 74-year-old woman suddenly complained about lower abdominal pain and vomiting after an operation for cervical spondylosis myelopathy. Her vital signs were slightly unstable and she was perspiring and exhibited pallor. Muscular defense was not clear, though her abdomen was tender and slightly distended. DIAGNOSIS: CT results showed massive HPVG. However, laboratory investigation did not clearly indicate bowel necrosis. Also, a contrast-CT scan was not performed due to her chronic renal dysfunction and asthma. INTERVENTION: Exploration was performed by single-port surgery (SPS) instead of exploratory laparotomy. OUTCOME: This approach showed no ischemic bowel and so conservative therapies were undertaken with confidence. The HPVG disappeared 2 days later, and she recover completely from the illness. LESSONS: HPVG requires immediate and reliable decision for management. However, unnecessary exploratory laparotomy should be avoided. Hence, a novel strategy should be considered in light of innovative surgical procedures. Our experience suggested that SPS was useful as an exploratory tool for the management of HPVG.

Protocol for enhanced recovery after surgery improves short-term outcomes for patients with gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The feasibility of the use of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in patients with gastric cancer remains unclear. METHODS: This study was a single-center, prospective randomized trial involving patients with gastric cancer undergoing curative gastrectomy. The primary end point was the length of postoperative hospital stay. Secondary end points were the postoperative complication rate, admission costs, weight loss, and amount of physical activity. RESULTS: From July 2013 to June 2015, we randomized 148 patients into an ERAS protocol group (n = 73) and a conventional protocol group (n = 69); six patients withdrew from the study. The hospital stay was significantly shorter in the ERAS protocol group than in the conventional protocol group (9 days vs 10 days; P = 0.037). The ERAS protocol group had a significantly lower rate of postoperative complications of grade III or higher (4.1% vs 15.4%; P = 0.042) and reduced costs of hospitalization (JPY 1,462,766 vs JPY 1,493,930; P = 0.045). The ratio of body weight to preoperative weight at 1 week and 1 month after the operation was higher in the ERAS protocol group (0.962 vs 0.957, P = 0.020, and 0.951 vs 0.937, P = 0.021, respectively). The ERAS protocol group recorded more physical activity in the first week after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The ERAS protocol is safe and efficient, and seems to improve the postoperative course of patients with gastric cancer.

Outpatient management without initial assessment for febrile patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze the feasibility of outpatient management without initial assessment for febrile patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. A total of 131 consecutive patients with breast cancer treated with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy from 2011 to 2013 at Osaka Medical College Hospital (Osaka, Japan) were retrospectively reviewed. In the case of developing a fever (body temperature, ≥38°C), the outpatients had been instructed to take previously prescribed oral antibiotics for 3 days without any initial assessment, and if no improvement had occurred by then, they were required to visit the hospital for examination and to undergo treatment based on the results of a risk assessment for complications. The primary aim of the present study was to assess the outcome of febrile episodes, while the secondary aim was to assess the incidence of febrile episodes, hospitalizations, and the type of chemotherapy. The 131 patients received 840 chemotherapy administrations. Fifty-five patients (42.0%) had a total of 75 febrile episodes after 840 chemotherapy administrations (8.9%). Treatment failure occurred in 12 of the 75 episodes (16.0%) in 11 of the 55 patients (20.0%). Only four episodes required hospitalization. Treatment success was achieved in 63 episodes (84.0%). In conclusion, the feasibility of outpatient management without initial assessment was evaluated in the present study for febrile patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer, and the outpatient strategy regimen may be safe and convenient for these patients.

Evaluation of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis after liver resection: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic prophylaxis is frequently administered after liver resection to prevent postoperative infections. However, very few studies have examined the usefulness of antibiotic prophylaxis after liver resection. A randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in patients after liver resection. METHODS: A total of 241 patients scheduled to undergo liver resection were randomly assigned to the non-postoperative antibiotic group (n = 95) or the antibiotic group (n = 95). The antibiotic group was given flomoxef sodium every 12 hours for 3 days after the operation. The end point was signs of infection, surgical site infection, or infectious complications. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in signs of infection (21.3% vs 25.5%, P = .606), the incidence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (11.7% vs 17.0%, P = .406), infectious complications (7.5% vs 17.0%, P = .073), surgical site infection (10.6% vs 13.8%, P = .657), and remote site infection (2.1% vs 8.5%, P = .100). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis cannot prevent postoperative infections after liver resection, and it is thought that antibiotic prophylaxis is unnecessary and costly.

Assessment of liver function for successful hepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with impaired hepatic function.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: This study aimed to construct a formula for assessing liver function in order to prevent post-hepatectomy liver failure. METHODS: A formula was constructed by analyzing data from 28 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with liver cirrhosis operated on between 1981 and 1984. Next, we evaluated the validity of this formula in 207 hepatectomy patients operated on from 1985 to 1999. For 145 hepatectomy patients operated on from 2000 to 2006, this formula was calculated before surgery in order to assess their risk of hepatectomy. RESULTS: The formula for liver functional evaluation, constructed from preoperative hepatic function parameters, was: liver failure score = 164.8 - 0.58 x Alb - 1.07 x HPT + 0.062 x GOT - 685 x K. ICG - 3.57 x OGTT. LI + 0.074 x RW, where Alb is albumin (g/dl); HPT, hepaplastin test (%); GOT, glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (U/l); K. ICG, K value of indocyanine green clearance test; OGTT. LI, 60-min/120-min glucose level in 75-g oral glucose tolerance test. linearity index of OGTT; and RW, weight of resected liver (g). We decided that a score below 25 would be safe for hepatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The mortality rate decreased from 3.9% in 1985--1999 to 1.3% in 2000--2006. This finding allows us to conclude that the formula is valid for assessing the risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure.