Objective assessment of robotic suturing skills with a new computerized system: A step forward in the training of robotic surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to assess robot-assisted suturing skills on a laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis model by using a novel computerized objective assessment system. METHODS: This study compared the suturing skills of 13 surgically naïve participants on an artificial intestinal anastomosis model that mimics real tissue. Each examinee sutured using da Vinci robot assistance under 2-D and 3-D visualization and with conventional laparoscopy (CL). Pressure-measuring and image-processing devices were employed to quantitatively evaluate suturing skills. Five unique criteria were used to evaluate the skills of participants. RESULTS: Suturing under 3-D visualization (P < 0.01) and with CL (P < 0.05) were significantly faster than under 2-D visualization. Sutures placed under 3-D (P < 0.05) and 2-D (P < 0.01) visualization had significantly better suture tension than those placed with CL, which did not meet acceptable values for suture tension. Sutures placed with CL had significantly better air pressure leakage than those placed under 2-D visualization (P < 0.05), which did not meet acceptable values for air pressure leakage and wound opening area. One participants failed to achieve full-thickness sutures with 2-D, two participants with CL, and one participant with 3-D. CONCLUSION: Using 3-D vision is necessary for complex maneuvering during robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. Our quantitative assessment system is useful for evaluating the skill acquisition of surgeon-trainees undergoing robotic surgery training.

Assessment potential of a new suture simulator in laparoscopic surgical skills training.

BACKGROUND: The skills necessary for performing effective laparoscopic suturing are difficult to acquire; as a result, simulators for learning these skills are rapidly becoming integrated into surgical training. The aim of the study was to verify whether a new hybrid simulator has the potential to measure skill improvement in young, less experienced gastroenterological surgeons. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 12 surgeons (median age, 29 (27-38)] years; 11 men (91.7%), one woman (8.3%)) who participated in a two-day laparoscopic training seminar. We used the new simulator before and after the program to evaluate individual performance. Skills were evaluated using five criteria: volume of air pressure leakage, number of full-thickness sutures, suture tension, wound area, and performance time. RESULTS: Air pressure leakage was significantly higher after than before the training (p = .027). The number of full-thickness sutures was significantly higher post-training (p < .01). Suture tension was significantly less post-training (p = .011). Wound opening areas were significantly smaller post-training (p = .018). Performance time was significantly shorter post-training (p = .032). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated the assessment quality of this new laparoscopic suture simulator.

Procedural surgical skill assessment in laparoscopic training environments.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify detailed differences in laparoscopic surgical processes between expert and novice surgeons in a training environment and demonstrate that surgical process modeling can be used for such detailed analysis. METHODS: Eleven expert surgeons each of whom had performed [Formula: see text] laparoscopic procedures were compared with 10 young surgeons each of whom had performed [Formula: see text] laparoscopic procedures, and five medical students. Each examinee performed a specific skill assessment task. During tasks, instrument motion was monitored using a video capture system. From the video, the corresponding workflow was recorded by labeling the surgeons' activities according to a predefined terminology. Activities represented manual work steps performed during the task, described by a combination of a verb (representing the action), a tool, and the involved structure. The results were described as the number of occurrences (times), average duration (seconds), total duration (seconds), minimal duration (seconds), maximal duration (seconds), and occupancy percentage (%). RESULTS: The terminology for describing the processes of this task included 10 actions, six tools, four structures, and three events for each hand. There were 63 combinations of different possible activities; significant differences in 12 activities were observed between the expert and novice groups (young surgeons and medical students). The expert group performed the task with fewer occurrences and shorter duration than did the novice group in the left hand. CONCLUSIONS: We identified differences in surgical process between experts and novices in laparoscopic surgical simulation. Our proposed method would be useful for education and training in laparoscopic surgery.

The effect of forceps manipulation for expert pediatric surgeons using an endoscopic pseudo-viewpoint alternating system: the phenomenon of economical slow and fast performance in endoscopic surgery.

PURPOSE: Endoscopic surgery is performed under a horizontal view in comparison to the vertical view that is associated with open surgery. We developed an endoscopic pseudo-viewpoint alternation system with out any scope action. We investigate the effect of this novel system on forceps manipulation among expert pediatric surgeons. METHODS: Six expert pediatric surgeons performed a Nissen wrap in a fundoplication simulator either with or without this system. The constructed Nissen wrap was evaluated. The total path length and the average velocity of the forceps were also analyzed. RESULTS: The times required either with or without this system were 587.5 ± 122.7 and 634.0 ± 212.4 s (p = 0.45), respectively. The total path lengths of right and left forceps either with or without this system were 12,309 ± 2495.5 and 15,726 ± 5649.6 mm (p = 0.07), 10,091 ± 2439.2 and 12,575 ± 5511.1 mm (p = 0.11), respectively. The average velocity of the right and left forceps with or without this system were 26.9 ± 5.29 and 31.6 ± 1.62 mm/s (p = 0.04), 21.6 ± 2.48 and 25.5 ± 6.48 mm/s (p = 0.15), respectively. There was no significance in the suture balance and suture interval. CONCLUSION: The endoscopic pseudo-viewpoint alternation system thus made it possible for expert pediatric surgeons to carry out slow and economical forceps manipulation. These effects make it possible for surgeons to perform safe and precise surgery, thus leading to a shortening of operation time.

Objective assessment of the suture ligature method for the laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis model using a new computerized system.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to develop a new objective assessment system for the suture ligature method employed in the laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis model. Suturing skills were evaluated objectively using this system. METHODS: This study compared 17 expert surgeons, each of whom had performed >500 laparoscopic procedures, with 36 novice surgeons, each of whom had performed <15 laparoscopic procedures. Each examinee performed a specific skill assessment task using an artificial model that mimics living tissue, which is linked with the Suture Simulator Instruction Evaluation Unit. The model used internal air pressure measurements and image processing to evaluate suturing skills. Five criteria were used to evaluate the skills of participants. RESULTS: The volumes of air pressure leak in the expert and novice groups were 21.13 ± 6.68 and 8.51 ± 8.60 kPa, respectively. The numbers of full-thickness sutures in the expert and novice groups were 2.94 ± 0.24 pairs and 2.47 ± 0.77 pairs, respectively. Suture tensions in the expert and novice groups were 60.99 ± 11.81 and 80.90 ± 16.63 %, respectively. The areas of wound-opening in the expert and novice groups were 1.76 ± 2.17 and 11.06 ± 15.37 mm(2), respectively. The performance times in the expert and novice groups were 349 ± 120 and 750 ± 269 s, respectively. Significant differences between the expert and novice groups for each criterion were observed. The acceptable range of values for each criterion except for the number of full-thickness sutures was statistically defined by the performance of the expert group. CONCLUSIONS: Our system is useful for the quantitative assessment of suturing skill in laparoscopic surgery. We believe that this system is a useful tool for training and assessment of laparoscopic surgeons.

Development of an objective endoscopic surgical skill assessment system for pediatric surgeons: suture ligature model of the crura of the diaphragm in infant fundoplication.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The Japanese Society of Pediatric Endoscopic Surgeons developed an endoscopic surgical skill qualification (ESSQ) system. However, this is a subjective system we developed and validated an objective skill evaluation system for pediatric surgeons. METHODS: In the ESSQ system, the task operation is laparoscopic fundoplication. Therefore, we set up a suture ligature model of the crura of the diaphragm for infant fundoplication. Examinees were divided into 2 groups, 10 experts and 16 trainees. They had to perform two suture ligatures of the crura using an intracorporeal knot in the box. Evaluation points were time, force on the tissue, suture tension, stitch spacing, equidistance, mean score, and total score. Statistical analysis was performed and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Experts showed better score than trainees in the time score (p < 0.0001), the score for force on the tissue (p < 0.0001), the stitch spacing score (p < 0.05), the equidistance score (p < 0.005), the mean score (p < 0.0001), and the total score (p < 0.0005), respectively. CONCLUSION: The results revealed that the expert group possessed gentle and speedy skills compared with that of the novices. Using this validation study, our established model could be used to objectively evaluate the endoscopic surgical skills of pediatric surgeons.

Skills assessment using a virtual reality simulator, LapSim, after training to develop fundamental skills for endoscopic surgery.

Education and training to maintain medical safety are very important within clinical settings. We have established a training center for endoscopic surgery and we regularly hold a unique training course, which focuses on the development of fundamental skills. One hundred and ninety-four surgeons who participated in our training course were divided into four groups according to their experience in performing laparoscopic procedures. Group 1: 0-19 laparoscopic procedures (n=44). Group 2: 20-49 laparoscopic procedures (n=53). Group 3: 50-99 laparoscopic procedures (n=46). Group 4: more than 100 laparoscopic procedures (n=55). All subjects underwent evaluation for "Lifting & Grasping" using a virtual reality (VR) simulator, LapSim, before and after the training course. The mean efficiency score, time to completion and tissue damage after training were significantly improved after the training as compared with before training. Before training, subjects with greater experience had better scores. However, the only significant difference in the score was between the low experience group and greatest experience group. After training, the score increased in all groups compared with that before training, and there was no significant difference between groups. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a VR simulator to assess fundamental skills for endoscopic surgery after training. We found that the scores for the task were associated with the level of experience of the surgeons.