Baseline factors and reason for cancellation of elective ophthalmic surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the baseline risk factors for elective ophthalmic surgery cancellations and characterise the reasons for cancellation. METHODS: This is a retrospective, non-randomised study performed at a large tertiary ophthalmic centre. It included a consecutive sample of patients above the age of 18 who had an ophthalmic surgery scheduled at Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH between January 2012 and December 2019. An automated search pull identified 75,908 scheduled surgeries (63,987 completed and 11,921 cancelled surgeries). Statistical analysis was performed using R (version 3.5.1). Main outcome measures were baseline factors that impact risk for surgery cancellation and reasons for surgery cancellation. RESULTS: Analysis was performed on 69,963 scheduled surgeries (57.37% Female, 42.63% Male; Mean age of 62.72 years; 59,959 completed and 10,004 cancelled surgeries). Of the 2384 cancelled surgeries with reasons provided, the most common causes of cancellation were patient refusal (38.42%), patient health condition (18.79%), and rescheduling of surgery (15.27%). Female sex, black race, patient age less than 50 years, non-cataract surgeries, regional mean household income greater than $82,900, Medicare insurance, and geographical distance of less than 10 miles from home to the surgery site were each associated with a significantly increased risk of surgery cancellation (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study successfully identified several baseline factors predicting elective ophthalmic surgery cancellation. The clinical insights gained from these lines of enquiry may be used to construct models that not only identify patients at greater risk for cancellation but also highlight which interventions have greatest efficacy in preventing ophthalmic surgery cancellations.

Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: Variations in Clinical Presentation and Surgical Outcomes by Socioeconomic Status and Race.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To characterize rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) presentation and repair outcomes by race and socioeconomic status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort one-center study of adults with a new RRD repair from 2012 to 2020. Logistic and linear regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: 61.7% were male, 84.5% White and 9.4% Black (total n = 1092). 95.8% White and 94.2% Black patients had retinal reattachment (P = .234). Macula-off status was more likely with Medicare/Medicaid than private insurance (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.41, P = .014); and less likely with higher income (OR 0.88, CI 0.81 to 0.96, P = .003). Black patients had worse best visual acuity (BVA) at presentation and follow-up (follow-up -6.93 letters, CI -13.19 to -0.64, P = .031), and higher odds of postoperative ocular hypertension (OHTN) (OR 2.41, CI 1.28 to 4.60, P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: Despite equivalent retinal reattachment rates, Black patients have worse BVA, and are more likely to develop OHTN than White patients. Macula-off status is less likely in patients with higher income or private insurance. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2022;53:538-545.].