RESUMO
Background: Due to aging of the population, the prevalence of aortic valve stenosis will increase drastically in upcoming years. Consequently, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures will also expand worldwide. Optimal selection of patients who benefit with improved symptoms and prognoses is key, since TAVI is not without its risks. Currently, we are not able to adequately predict functional outcomes after TAVI. Quality of life measurement tools and traditional functional assessment tests do not always agree and can depend on factors unrelated to heart disease. Activity tracking using wearable devices might provide a more comprehensive assessment. Objective: This study aimed to identify objective parameters (eg, change in heart rate) associated with improvement after TAVI for severe aortic stenosis from a wearable device. Methods: In total, 100 patients undergoing routine TAVI wore a Philips Health Watch device for 1 week before and after the procedure. Watch data were analyzed offline-before TAVI for 97 patients and after TAVI for 75 patients. Results: Parameters such as the total number of steps and activity time did not change, in contrast to improvements in the 6-minute walking test (6MWT) and physical limitation domain of the transformed WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire. Conclusions: These findings, in an older TAVI population, show that watch-based parameters, such as the number of steps, do not change after TAVI, unlike traditional 6MWT and QoL assessments. Basic wearable device parameters might be less appropriate for measuring treatment effects from TAVI.
Assuntos
Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Dispositivos Eletrônicos Vestíveis , Humanos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/instrumentação , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/estatística & dados numéricos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/métodos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Prospectivos , Dispositivos Eletrônicos Vestíveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Dispositivos Eletrônicos Vestíveis/normas , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Idoso , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Qualidade de Vida/psicologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Prehospital risk stratification and triage are currently not performed in patients suspected of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). This may lead to prolonged time to revascularisation, increased duration of hospital admission and higher healthcare costs. The preHEART score (prehospital history, ECG, age, risk factors and point-of-care troponin score) can be used by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel for prehospital risk stratification and triage decisions in patients with NSTE-ACS. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effect of prehospital risk stratification and direct transfer to a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centre, based on the preHEART score, on time to final invasive diagnostics or culprit revascularisation. METHODS: Prospective, multicentre, two-cohort study in patients with suspected NSTE-ACS. The first cohort is observational (standard care), while the second (interventional) cohort includes patients who are stratified for direct transfer to either a PCI or a non-PCI centre based on their preHEART score. Risk stratification and triage are performed by EMS personnel. The primary endpoint of the study is time from first medical contact until final invasive diagnostics or revascularisation. Secondary endpoints are time from first medical contact until intracoronary angiography (ICA), duration of hospital admission, number of invasive diagnostics, number of inter-hospital transfers and major adverse cardiac events at 7 and 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 1069 patients were included. In the interventional cohort (n=577), time between final invasive diagnostics or revascularisation (42 (17-101) hours vs 20 (5-44) hours, p<0.001) and length of hospital admission (3 (2-5) days vs 2 (1-4) days, p=0.007) were shorter than in the observational cohort (n=492). In patients with NSTE-ACS in need for ICA or revascularisation, healthcare costs were reduced in the interventional cohort (5599 (2978-9625) vs 4899 (2278-5947), p=0.02). CONCLUSION: Prehospital risk stratification and direct transfer to a PCI centre, based on the preHEART score, reduces time from first medical contact to final invasive diagnostics and revascularisation, reduces duration of hospital admission and decreases healthcare costs in patients with NSTE-ACS in need for ICA or revascularisation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05243485.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Humanos , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Estudos de Coortes , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de RiscoRESUMO
The need for a quantitative and operator-independent assessment of coronary microvascular function is increasingly recognized. We propose the theoretical framework of microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) as an index specific for the microvasculature, independent of autoregulation and myocardial mass, and based on operator-independent measurements of absolute values of coronary flow and pressure. In its general form, MRR equals coronary flow reserve (CFR) divided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) corrected for driving pressures. In 30 arteries, pressure, temperature, and flow velocity measurements were obtained simultaneously at baseline (BL), during infusion of saline at 10 mL/min (rest) and 20 mL/min (hyperemia). A strong correlation was found between continuous thermodilution-derived MRR and Doppler MRR (r = 0.88; 95% confidence interval: 0.72-0.93; P < 0.001). MRR was independent from the epicardial resistance, the lower the FFR value, the greater the difference between MRR and CFR. Therefore, MRR is proposed as a specific, quantitative, and operator-independent metric to quantify coronary microvascular dysfunction.
Assuntos
Circulação Coronária , Microcirculação , Idoso , Velocidade do Fluxo Sanguíneo , Ecocardiografia Doppler , Feminino , Reserva Fracionada de Fluxo Miocárdico , Humanos , Masculino , Termodiluição , Resistência VascularRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Invasive functional assessment is a mainstay in the management of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), but there is uncertainty on the comparative accuracy of diagnostic indices of functional significance. We aimed to validate the diagnostic performance of a novel non-hyperemic diastolic pressure ratio (dPR). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis including two separate registries (VERIFY 2, Latina, Italy) of patients in whom functional indices were measured for lesions with angiographically moderate severity. On top of fractional flow reserve, distal coronary pressure (Pd)/aortic pressure (Pa) ratio, instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and diastolic pressure ratio (dPR) were computed using a novel dedicated algorithm over 4 consecutive beats. Agreement/discrepancy between indexes was appraised Bland-Altman analysis, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and unsupervised machine learning. RESULTS: A total of 525 lesions from 479 patients were included. The novel dPR was highly correlated with iFR (R2=0.99, P<0.001), with a mean difference of -0.004±0.014. The diagnostic performance of dPR (best cutoff value: ≤0.89) against iFR was as follows: accuracy =96%; sensitivity =94%; specificity =97%; positive-predictive value =94%; and negative-predictive value =96%. Additionally, AUC to predict iFR≤0.89 was 0.99, which was significantly higher than that of Pd/Pa (0.97, P<0.001). In the iFR range of 0.85-0.93 ("grey zone"), the diagnostic performance was well maintained (accuracy =91%; sensitivity =87%; specificity =93%; and AUC=0.96). Results were supported also by unsupervised learning analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter registry suggests this novel dPR algorithm provides results that are numerically equivalent to iFR. Pending further studies, physicians may consider using this novel dPR algorithm to gauge the functional significance of a coronary lesion.
Assuntos
Algoritmos , Pressão Arterial , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Reserva Fracionada de Fluxo Miocárdico , Idoso , Angiografia Coronária , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
During the last two decades, there has been a sharp increase in both interest and knowledge about the coronary microcirculation. Since these small vessels are not visible by the human eye, physiologic measurements should be used to characterize their function. The invasive methods presently used (coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microvascular resistance (IMR)) are operator-dependent and mandate the use of adenosine to induce hyperemia. In recent years, a new thermodilution-based method for measurement of absolute coronary blood flow and microvascular resistance has been proposed and initial procedural problems have been overcome. Presently, the technique is easy to perform using the Rayflow infusion catheter and the Coroventis software. The method is accurate, reproducible, and completely operator-independent. This method has been validated noninvasively against the current golden standard for flow assessment: Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT). In addition, absolute flow and resistance measurements have proved to be safe, both periprocedurally and at long-term follow-up. With an increasing number of studies being performed, this method has great potential for better understanding and quantification of microvascular disease.
Assuntos
Circulação Coronária/fisiologia , Vasos Coronários/fisiopatologia , Microcirculação , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico , Termodiluição/métodos , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Resistência VascularRESUMO
Background: Loss of high-molecular-weight multimers (HMWMs) of von Willebrand factor (vWF) occurs due to high shear stress in patients with aortic stenosis. As symptoms of aortic stenosis occur during exercise, measurement of vWF during exercise might identify patients with aortic stenosis of clinical importance. The aim of this pilot study is to evaluate whether vWF changes over time as a result of exercise in patients with asymptomatic moderate or severe aortic stenosis. Methods: Ten subjects were analysed for changes in vWF by measuring HMWMs and closure time with adenosine diphosphate (CT-ADP). All subjects underwent a full stress test on a bicycle ergometer. At rest and at peak exercise, a transthoracic echocardiogram was performed. HMWMs and CT-ADP were assessed at baseline, during and after exercise. Results: HMWMs and CT-ADP did not change significantly during exercise, p=0.45 and p=0.65, respectively. HMWMs and CT-ADP correlated well, Spearman's rho -0.621, p<0.001. HMWMs during peak exercise did not correlate with maximal velocity measured, p=0.21. CT-ADP during exercise correlated well with the maximal echocardiographic velocity over the aortic valve (AV), rho 0.82, p=0.04. Conclusions: In a cohort of 10 patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis, we observed no significant change in vWF biomarkers during exercise. Peak CT-ADP during exercise showed a good correlation with peak AV velocity measured with echo. Although CT-ADP is an easy test to perform and could be an alternative for peak AV velocity measured during exercise, our results suggest that it can only detect large changes in shear stress.
Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico , Teste de Esforço , Fator de von Willebrand/análise , Difosfato de Adenosina/sangue , Idoso , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/sangue , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/fisiopatologia , Ciclismo , Biomarcadores/sangue , Ecocardiografia sob Estresse , Feminino , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
AIMS: In the minimalist transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) era, the usage of transoesophageal echocardiography has become restricted. Conversely, aortography has gained clinical ground in quantifying prosthetic valve regurgitation (PVR) during the procedure. In a mock circulation system, we sought to compare the contrast volume required and the accuracy of aortographic videodensitometric PVR assessment using a synchronised diastolic and standard (non-synchronised) injection aortography. METHODS AND RESULTS: Synchronised diastolic injection triggered by the signal stemming from the mock circulation was compared with standard non-synchronised injection. A transcatheter heart valve was implanted and was deformed step by step by advancing a screw perpendicularly to the cage of the valve in order to create increasing PVR. Quantitative measurement of PVR was derived from time-density curves of both a reference area (aortic root) and a region of interest (left ventricle) developed by a videodensitometric software. The volume of contrast required for the synchronised diastolic injection was significantly less than in the non-synchronised injection (8.1 [7.9-8.5] ml vs. 19.4 [19.2-19.9] ml, p<0.001). The correlation between the two methods was substantial (Spearman's coefficient rho ranging from 0.991 to 0.968). Intraobserver intra-class correlation coefficient for both methods of injection was 0.999 (95% CI: 0.996-1.000) for the synchronised diastolic and 0.999 (95% CI: 0.996-1.000) for the non-synchronised injection group. The mean difference in the rating was 0.17% and limits of agreement were ±1.64% for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: A short synchronised diastolic injection enables contrast volume reduction during aortography without compromising the accuracy of the quantitative assessment of PVR using videodensitometry.
Assuntos
Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Aortografia/métodos , Meios de Contraste/administração & dosagem , Modelos Anatômicos , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Valva Aórtica/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/fisiopatologia , Diástole , Humanos , Injeções , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Interpretação de Imagem Radiográfica Assistida por Computador , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Previous studies on gender differences in outcome in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have been performed, but most of those are from before the current era of PCI technique and medical therapy and have a short duration of follow-up. The objective of our study is to assess the influence of gender on long-term outcome in patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous intervention (PCI) between January 2006 and May 2008. METHODS: Two-year follow-up data from 202 female and 668 male patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI were available from the DEBATER (A Comparison of Drug Eluting and Bare Metal Stents for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with or without Abciximab in ST-segment elevation Myocardial Infarction: The Eindhoven Reperfusion Study) trial database. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as the composite of death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. RESULTS: Women were older (64.7 ± 11.7 vs. 59.0 ± 10.7; P < 0.001), and had more often diabetes mellitus (15% vs. 9%; P = 0.01) and hypertension (44% vs. 25%; P < 0.001). At two years, the rate of MACE was significantly higher in women (21% vs. 14%; P = 0.02). The mortality rate in women was 8% versus 2.6% in men (P < 0.001). However, multivariate analysis after adjustment for age and the baseline characteristics hypertension, smoking, diabetes mellitus, stent diameter, and time between onset of symptoms and arrival of the ambulance showed similar MACE and mortality rates in men and women. CONCLUSION: Women have higher rates of both MACE and mortality after primary PCI for STEMI compared to men because of higher age with higher baseline risk profiles.
Assuntos
Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Abciximab , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Comorbidade , Stents Farmacológicos , Feminino , Humanos , Fragmentos Fab das Imunoglobulinas/uso terapêutico , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Metais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio/etiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Países Baixos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/mortalidade , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Desenho de Prótese , Recidiva , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Stents , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare fractional flow reserve (FFR) with the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) in patients with coronary artery disease and also to determine whether the iFR is independent of hyperemia. BACKGROUND: FFR is a validated index of coronary stenosis severity. FFR-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves clinical outcomes compared to angiographic guidance alone. iFR has been proposed as a new index of stenosis severity that can be measured without adenosine. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, international study of 206 consecutive patients referred for PCI and a retrospective analysis of 500 archived pressure recordings. Aortic and distal coronary pressures were measured in duplicate in patients under resting conditions and during intravenous adenosine infusion at 140 µg/kg/min. RESULTS: Compared to the FFR cut-off value of ≤0.80, the diagnostic accuracy of the iFR value of ≤0.80 was 60% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 53% to 67%) for all vessels studied and 51% (95% CI: 43% to 59%) for those patients with FFR in the range of 0.60 to 0.90. iFR was significantly influenced by the induction of hyperemia: mean ± SD iFR at rest was 0.82 ± 0.16 versus 0.64 ± 0.18 with hyperemia (p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristics confirmed that the diagnostic accuracy of iFR was similar to resting Pd/Pa and trans-stenotic pressure gradient and significantly inferior to hyperemic iFR. Analysis of our retrospectively acquired dataset showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: iFR correlates weakly with FFR and is not independent of hyperemia. iFR cannot be recommended for clinical decision making in patients with coronary artery disease.
Assuntos
Estenose Coronária/diagnóstico , Reserva Fracionada de Fluxo Miocárdico/fisiologia , Contração Miocárdica/fisiologia , Adenosina/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Angiografia Coronária , Estenose Coronária/patologia , Estenose Coronária/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperemia/fisiopatologia , Infusões Intravenosas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Curva ROC , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Vasodilatadores/administração & dosagemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine the clinical performance of and theoretical basis for the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) approximation to the fractional flow reserve (FFR). BACKGROUND: Recent work has proposed iFR as a vasodilation-free alternative to FFR for making mechanical revascularization decisions. Its fundamental basis is the assumption that diastolic resting myocardial resistance equals mean hyperemic resistance. METHODS: Pressure-only and combined pressure-flow clinical data from several centers were studied both empirically and by using pressure-flow physiology. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed by repeatedly selecting random parameters as if drawing from a cohort of hypothetical patients, using the reported ranges of these physiologic variables. RESULTS: We aggregated observations of 1,129 patients, including 120 with combined pressure-flow data. Separately, we performed 1,000 Monte Carlo simulations. Clinical data showed that iFR was +0.09 higher than FFR on average, with ±0.17 limits of agreement. Diastolic resting resistance was 2.5 ± 1.0 times higher than mean hyperemic resistance in patients. Without invoking wave mechanics, classic pressure-flow physiology explained clinical observations well, with a coefficient of determination of >0.9. Nearly identical scatter of iFR versus FFR was seen between simulation and patient observations, thereby supporting our model. CONCLUSIONS: iFR provides both a biased estimate of FFR, on average, and an uncertain estimate of FFR in individual cases. Diastolic resting myocardial resistance does not equal mean hyperemic resistance, thereby contravening the most basic condition on which iFR depends. Fundamental relationships of coronary pressure and flow explain the iFR approximation without invoking wave mechanics.
Assuntos
Velocidade do Fluxo Sanguíneo/fisiologia , Estenose Coronária/diagnóstico , Reserva Fracionada de Fluxo Miocárdico/fisiologia , Contração Miocárdica/fisiologia , Adenosina/administração & dosagem , Estenose Coronária/fisiopatologia , Vasos Coronários/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Hiperemia/diagnóstico , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Método de Monte Carlo , Revascularização Miocárdica , Resistência Vascular/fisiologia , Vasodilatadores/administração & dosagemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the validity of measuring fractional flow reserve (FFR) of the left main (LM) coronary artery in the setting of concomitant left anterior descending (LAD) or left circumflex (LCX) stenoses. BACKGROUND: The theoretical impact of a stenosis in the LAD on the FFR assessment of intermediate LM disease with the pressure wire in an unobstructed LCX is currently unknown. METHODS: A previously validated in vitro model of the coronary circulation was used to create a fixed intermediate stenosis of the LM and a variable downstream LAD or LCX stenosis. The true LM FFR (FFR(LM true)), with no concomitant downstream disease, was compared to the apparent LM FFR (FFR(LM apparent)), with concomitant downstream disease measured with different degrees of LAD or LCX disease. Additionally, an equation based on a resistors model was derived to predict the effect of downstream stenosis on LM FFR (FFR(LM predicted)). RESULTS: In the setting of isolated moderate LM disease (FFR 0.72 ± 0.08), mild to moderate proximal LAD or LCX lesions did not significantly affect LM FFR. Lesions with a composite FFR (LM + downstream disease) ≥0.65 resulted in an FFR(LM apparent) that was not significantly different from FFR(LM true) (0.76 ± 0.06 vs. 0.76 ± 0.05, p = 0.124). Our equation for FFR(LM predicted) accurately modeled the effects of concomitant disease (r = 0.95, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that in the presence of proximal mild to moderate LAD or LCX disease, LM FFR can be reliably measured with the pressure wire placed in the uninvolved epicardial artery.
Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana/patologia , Reestenose Coronária/patologia , Vasos Coronários/patologia , Reserva Fracionada de Fluxo Miocárdico , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos , Prognóstico , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
Direct volumetric assessment of coronary flow during cardiac catheterization has not been available so far. In the current study continuous infusion thermodilution, a method based on continuous infusion of saline into a selective coronary artery is evaluated. Theoretically, volumetric flow can be calculated from the known infusion rate (Q(i)), the temperatures of the blood (T(b)), the saline (T(i)), and the mixture downstream to the infusion site (T). We aimed to validate and optimize the measurement method in an in vitro model of the coronary circulation. Full mixing of infusate and blood was found to be the main prerequisite for accurate determination of the coronary flow. To achieve full mixing the influence of catheter design, infusion rate, and location of temperature measurement were assessed. We found that continuous infusion thermodilution slightly overestimated coronary flow determined by directly measured reference flow by 7+/-8%, over the entire physiological flow range of 50-250 ml/min. These results were found using a specially designed infusion catheter (infusion mainly through distally located sideholes), a high enough infusion rate (25 ml/min), and measurement of the mixing temperature between 5 and 8 cm distal from the tip of the infusion catheter. Absolute coronary flow rate can be measured reliably by the continuous infusion method when full mixing is present, under the conditions mentioned above.
Assuntos
Velocidade do Fluxo Sanguíneo/fisiologia , Circulação Coronária/fisiologia , Vasos Coronários/fisiologia , Diagnóstico por Computador/métodos , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Reologia/métodos , Termodiluição/métodos , Simulação por Computador , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary angiography is the standard method for guiding the placement of the stent. It is unclear whether routine measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR; the ratio of maximal blood flow in a stenotic artery to normal maximal flow), in addition to angiography, improves outcomes. METHODS: In 20 medical centers in the United States and Europe, we randomly assigned 1005 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease to undergo PCI with implantation of drug-eluting stents guided by angiography alone or guided by FFR measurements in addition to angiography. Before randomization, lesions requiring PCI were identified on the basis of their angiographic appearance. Patients assigned to angiography-guided PCI underwent stenting of all indicated lesions, whereas those assigned to FFR-guided PCI underwent stenting of indicated lesions only if the FFR was 0.80 or less. The primary end point was the rate of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization at 1 year. RESULTS: The mean (+/-SD) number of indicated lesions per patient was 2.7+/-0.9 in the angiography group and 2.8+/-1.0 in the FFR group (P=0.34). The number of stents used per patient was 2.7+/-1.2 and 1.9+/-1.3, respectively (P<0.001). The 1-year event rate was 18.3% (91 patients) in the angiography group and 13.2% (67 patients) in the FFR group (P=0.02). Seventy-eight percent of the patients in the angiography group were free from angina at 1 year, as compared with 81% of patients in the FFR group (P=0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Routine measurement of FFR in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who are undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents significantly reduces the rate of the composite end point of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization at 1 year. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00267774.)