Drug-Related Problems and Recommendations Made during Home Medicines Reviews for Sick Day Medication Management in Australia.

Backgrounds and Objectives: Using certain medications during an intercurrent illness can increase the risk of drug related problems (DRP) occurring such as acute kidney injury (AKI). Medications that increase this risk include sulfonylureas, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, diuretics, metformin, angiotensin receptor blockers, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories drugs, and sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SADMANS). Sick day medication guidance (SDMG) recommends withholding SADMANS medications during an intercurrent illness where adequate fluid intake cannot be maintained. But uptake of these recommendations is poor, and it is not known whether Australian pharmacists currently provide these recommendations during home medicine reviews (HMR) as per SDMG. We aimed to gain an understanding of the characteristics of DRP identified by pharmacists during HMR, especially those relating to SADMANS medications. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective audit of 201 randomly selected HMR reports, conducted by accredited pharmacists from 2020 to 2022, that were analysed in 2023. All DRP and recommendations were categorised using a modified DOCUMENT system. Results: Overall, over 98% of participants experienced a DRP and a total of 710 DRP were found, where participants experienced an average of 4.0 ± 2.0 DRP each. Non-SADMANS medications accounted for 83.1% of all DRPs, with nervous system medications contributing the most. Common problems seen in non-SADMANS medications were related to toxicity, over/underdosing and undertreating. Diuretics contributed most to DRP in SADMANS medications. Problems with SADMANS were mainly related to toxicity and contraindications. No pharmacists provided SDMG despite 71.1% of participants using at least one SADMANS medication. Conclusions: We conclude that DRP remain prevalent in community pharmacy settings. Sick day recommendations were not provided in the HMRs included in our study, possibly due to lack of pharmacist knowledge and awareness. To ensure best practice, more research should be conducted to determine pharmacists' knowledge of and barriers to provision of sick day recommendations.

The implementation and usability of HIRAID, a structured approach to emergency nursing assessment.

BACKGROUND: Emergency nurses are responsible for the initial assessment, management and safety of critically ill patients. HIRAID, an evidence-informed emergency nursing assessment framework, is known to improve emergency nursing patient-assessment in the simulated environment however has not been evaluated in the clinical setting. METHODS: A pre-post design was used to assess the usability and impact of HIRAID on emergency nurses self-efficacy in the emergency department (ED). Nursing and medical staff from three Australian EDs were surveyed. Descriptive and optimal pooled sample t-tests statistics were conducted. RESULTS: One hundred and two emergency nurses completed the pre-intervention self-efficacy survey and 63 completed the post-intervention self-efficacy and satisfaction survey. Forty-two and 17 medical officers completed the pre- and post-intervention satisfaction surveys, respectively. Nursing staff self-efficacy levels were unchanged pre- and post-HIRAID implementation (Mean (SD): 8.8 (0.21) vs. 8.7 (0.20)) as was medical staff satisfaction (Mean (SD):7.5 (1.43) vs. 7.8 (1.07)), although there was a trend towards improved communication. CONCLUSION: The HIRAID structured approach to patient assessment is acceptable, feasible, practical and appropriate for use in the clinical environment. Further research will demonstrate the direct effects of HIRAID on clinical performance.

Parent experiences and psychosocial support needs 6 months following paediatric critical injury: A qualitative study.

INTRODUCTION: Parents of critically injured children can experience high levels of psychological distress post-injury, however little is known about their experiences and needs following injury. This study aimed to explore parent experiences and psychosocial support needs in the six months following child critical injury. METHODS: An interpretive qualitative design was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 parents of 23 critically injured children. Interviews explored parent experiences and psychosocial support needs. Qualitative data were managed using NVIVO 10 and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: integrating back into home life; adjusting mentally and emotionally to injury; coping with injury as a family; and navigating resources to meet family needs. Parents and families experienced substantial ongoing emotional impacts at 6 months following child injury. Parents were unprepared for the negative changes in their child's psychological wellbeing and behaviour post injury, and parents' mental health was negatively impacted, with mothers more likely to seek emotional support than fathers. Parents reported receiving no psychosocial follow-up from the hospital and limited information about community services and accessing local community resources on returning home. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to include all family members in discharge planning, and to use a family-centred continuity-of-care approach from the time of child injury through to post-discharge recovery. To strengthen parent and family wellbeing, a biopsychosocial holistic approach is recommended, including cognitive-behavioural and other psychological strategies to help reduce distress for parents and all family members and strengthen their coping capacity. A dedicated family support coordinator role to facilitate care over the child recovery trajectory, and development of accessible online and e-psychosocial support resources for parents and families are recommended.

Resilience-promoting factors for parents of severely injured children during the acute hospitalisation period: A qualitative inquiry.

BACKGROUND: Paediatric injury impacts the entire family. Many parents experience stress and anxiety following paediatric injury, but little is known about factors that support parents' wellbeing and how they successfully manage the adversity of child injury during acute hospitalisation. AIM: To explore parent experiences and resilience-promoting factors that facilitate the wellbeing of parents with severely injured children during the acute hospitalisation period. METHODS: A qualitative inquiry conducted across four major Australian paediatric trauma services. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 40 parents of 30 severely injured children aged 0-12 years during the acute post-injury hospitalisation period. Interviews explored parents' experiences and how parents had managed the stress of their child's injury during the acute hospitalisation period. Data were analysed using directed content analysis. RESULTS: Parents identified a range of individual characteristics and resources, and those of their children and families, communities, and the hospital environment, which facilitated their wellbeing during the initial post-injury period. Three themes were derived from analysis: Drawing on inner strengths; Having positive and supportive relationships; Being in a safe place with the right help. CONCLUSION: Resilience-promoting factors for parents of injured children can be used to inform development of brief online intervention modules to enhance parent resilience. Routine screening and targeted psychological first aid for parental distress are recommended.

Experiences and needs of parents of critically injured children during the acute hospital phase: A qualitative investigation.

INTRODUCTION: Physical injury is a leading cause of death and disability among children worldwide and the largest cause of paediatric hospital admission. Parents of critically injured children are at increased risk of developing mental and emotional distress in the aftermath of child injury. In the Australian context, there is limited evidence on parent experiences of child injury and hospitalisation, and minimal understanding of their support needs. The aim of this investigation was to explore parents' experiences of having a critically injured child during the acute hospitalisation phase of injury, and to determine their support needs during this time. METHODS: This multi-centre study forms part of a larger longitudinal mixed methods study investigating the experiences, unmet needs and well-being of parents of critically injured children over the two-year period following injury. This paper describes parents' experiences of having a child 0-13 years hospitalised with critical injury in one of four Australian paediatric hospitals. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with forty parents and transcribed verbatim. The data were managed using NVIVO 10 software and thematically analysed. FINDINGS: Forty parents (26 mothers and 14 fathers) of 30 children (14 girls and 16 boys aged 1-13 years) from three Australian States participated. The majority of children were Australian born. Three main themes with sub-themes were identified: navigating the crisis of child injury; coming to terms with the complexity of child injury; and finding ways to meet the family's needs. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for targeted psychological care provision for parents of critically injured children in the acute hospital phase, including psychological first aid and addressing parental blame attribution. Parents and children would benefit from the implementation of anticipatory guidance frameworks informed by a family-centred social ecological approach to prepare them for the trauma journey and for discharge. This approach could inform care delivery throughout the child injury recovery trajectory. The development and implementation of a major trauma family support coordinator in paediatric trauma centres would make a tangible difference to the care of critically injured children and their families.

General practitioner-pharmacist interactions in professional pharmacy services.

Australian community pharmacies offer a range of professional pharmacy services (PPS) which include Home Medicines Review (HMR) and the Diabetes Medication Assistance Service (DMAS). The extent of interaction and collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and pharmacists in the context of these services is unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate (1) the nature and extent of interactions between GPs and community pharmacists and; (2) the factors that influence these interactions in the context of PPS. Individual semi-structured face-to-face and telephone interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 15 GPs and 15 pharmacists in rural and metropolitan areas of New South Wales, Australia. The results indicated that involvement in PPS resulted in a perceived increase in the level of interactions between the pharmacist and GP. Factors found which may influence collaborative behaviour in PPS include interactional, practitioner and environmental determinants. These factors are in line with what has previously been reported however, facilitators of collaboration in the primary care, PPS context included additional environmental factors such as the presence of rules and protocols, interprofessional continuing education and the availability of adequate remuneration. Attention to these environmental factors as well as the more established interactional and practitioner determinants will improve collaboration in PPS.