Trend and Economic Implications of Implant Selection in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database From 2007 to 2017.

INTRODUCTION: Intertrochanteric (IT) fractures are estimated to burden the healthcare system six billion dollars annually. Previous studies have documented a trend of early-career orthopaedic surgeons favoring intramedullary nails (IMNs) for these fractures, despite multiple randomized controlled trials demonstrating no evidence for improved patient outcomes when compared with sliding hip screws (SHSs). The purpose of this study was to report the trend of implant utilization for IT fracture fixation from 2007 to 2017. METHODS: The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Part II (oral) database was used to identify IT fractures (International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, code 820.21 or 820.31, and 10th revision, code S72.14) over a 10-year period (2007 to 2017). The cases were categorized by IMN or SHS fixation by surgeon-reported Current Procedural Terminology codes. Utilization of the devices was analyzed according to year, and the implants were compared for outcomes, complications, and cost. RESULTS: As of 2017, 92.4% of IT fractures were being fixed through IMN, representing a 49.1% increase in the number of IMN devices used during the course of this study. SHS had significantly lower medical complication rate (21.3%) and readmittance rate (4.0%) compared with the IMN (medical complication: 26.9%; P < 0.01) (readmittance rate: 5.4%; P = 0.02). SHS also had significantly lower rates of anemia (5.2%) and patient expiration (4.8%) compared with IMN (anemia: 10.2%; P < 0.01) (patient expiration: 6.1%; P = 0.01). Overall surgical complication rates, reoperative rates, and anesthetic complications did not differ between constructs. A cost differential of $671,812 was found from the 2007-projected distribution, which rose to $3,911,211.00 across the entire 11-year duration of the study for the population. DISCUSSION: Early-career orthopaedic surgeons continue to use a more expensive implant for IT fractures despite limited evidence for improved outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; Retrospective Cohort Study.

Cost Comparison of Botulinum Toxin Injections Versus Surgical Treatment in Pediatric Patients With Cerebral Palsy: A Markov Model.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of surgical release to botulinum toxin injections in the treatment of upper-extremity (UE) cerebral palsy (CP). METHODS: A Markov transition-state model was developed to assess the direct and indirect costs as well as accumulated quality-adjusted life-years associated with surgery (surgery group) and continuous botulinum toxin injections (botulinum group) for the treatment of UE CP in children aged 7 to 12 years. Direct medical costs were obtained from institutional billing departments. The number of parental missed workdays associated with each treatment was estimated and previously published regressions were used to calculate indirect costs associated with missed work. Total costs, cost-effectiveness, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and willingness to pay thresholds were used to make decisions regarding society's willingness to pay for the incremental cost of each treatment given the incremental benefit. RESULTS: The surgery group demonstrated lower direct, indirect, and total costs compared with the botulinum group. Direct costs were $29,250.50 for the surgery group and $50,596.00 for the botulinum group. Indirect costs were $9,467.46 for the surgery group and $44,428.60 for the botulinum group. Total costs were $38,717.96 for the surgery group and $95,024.60 for the botulinum group, a difference of $56,306.64. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was -$42,019.88, indicating that surgery is a less costly and more effective treatment and that botulinum injections fall outside the societal willingness to pay threshold. Excluding indirect costs associated with parental missed work during home occupational therapy did not have a significant impact on the model. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery is associated with lower direct, indirect, and total costs, as well as a greater number of accumulated quality-adjusted life-years. Surgery provides a greater benefit at a lower cost, which suggests that botulinum injections should be used sparingly in this population. Treatment with surgery could represent savings of $5.6 to $11.3 billion annually in the United States. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic/Decision Analysis II.

Use of the Behavior Assessment Tool in 18 Pilot Residency Programs.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and evaluate the effectiveness of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Behavior Tool (ABOSBT) for measuring professionalism. METHODS: Through collaboration between the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery and American Orthopaedic Association's Council of Residency Directors, 18 residency programs piloted the use of the ABOSBT. Residents requested assessments from faculty at the end of their clinical rotations, and a 360° request was performed near the end of the academic year. Program Directors (PDs) rated individual resident professionalism (based on historical observation) at the outset of the study, for comparison to the ABOSBT results. RESULTS: Nine thousand eight hundred ninety-two evaluations were completed using the ABOSBT for 449 different residents by 1,012 evaluators. 97.6% of all evaluations were scored level 4 or 5 (high levels of professional behavior) across all of the 5 domains. In total, 2.4% of all evaluations scored level 3 or below reflecting poorer performance. Of 431 residents, the ABOSBT identified 26 of 32 residents who were low performers (2 or more < level 3 scores in a domain) and who also scored "below expectations" by the PD at the start of the pilot project (81% sensitivity and 57% specificity), including 13 of these residents scoring poorly in all 5 domains. Evaluators found the ABOSBT was easy to use (96%) and that it was an effective tool to assess resident professional behavior (81%). CONCLUSIONS: The ABOSBT was able to identify 2.4% low score evaluations (

Women in Orthopaedics: How Understanding Implicit Bias Can Help Your Practice.

Women comprise approximately 50% of medical students; however, only 14% of current orthopaedic residents are women. There are many factors that contribute to the reluctance of female medical students to enter the field including limited exposure to musculoskeletal medicine during medical school, negative perception of the field, lack of female mentors, barriers to promotion, and acceptance by senior faculty. Diversity in orthopaedics is critical to provide culturally competent care. Two pipeline programs, the Perry Initiative and Nth Dimensions, have successful track records in increasing female and underrepresented minorities in orthopaedic surgery residency training. Recognizing and combating implicit bias in orthopaedics will improve recruitment, retention, promotion, and compensation of female orthopaedic surgeons. The purpose of this chapter is to provide an overview of the current status of women in orthopaedics, describe ways to improve diversity in the field, and make surgeons aware of how implicit bias can contribute to discrepancies seen in orthopaedic surgery, including pay scale inequities and women in leadership positions.

What Proportion of Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs Have Accessible Parental Leave Policies, and How Generous are They?

BACKGROUND: Parental leave during graduate medical education is a component of wellness in the workplace. Although every graduate medical education program is required by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) to have a leave policy, individual programs can create their own policies. The ACGME stipulates that "the sponsoring institution must provide a written policy on resident vacation and other leaves of absence (with or without pay) to include parental and sick leave to all applicants." To our knowledge, a review of parental leave policies of all orthopaedic surgery residency programs has not been performed. QUESTION/PURPOSES: (1) What proportion of orthopaedic surgery residency programs have accessible parental (maternity, paternity, and adoption) leave policies? (2) If a policy exists, what financial support is provided and what allotment of time is allowed? METHODS: All ACGME-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency programs in 2017 and 2018 were identified. One hundred sixty-six ACGME-accredited allopathic orthopaedic surgery residency programs were identified and reviewed by two observers. Reviewers determined if a program had written parental leave policy, including maternity, paternity, or adoption leave. Ten percent of programs were contacted to verify reviewer findings. The search was sequentially conducted starting with the orthopaedic surgery residency program's website. If the information was not found, the graduate medical education (GME) website was searched. If the information was not found on either website, the program was contacted directly via email and phone. Parental leave policies were classified as to whether they provided dedicated parental leave pay, provided sick leave pay, or deferred to unpaid Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) policies. The number of weeks of maternity, paternity, and adoption leave allowed was collected. RESULTS: Our results showed that 3% (5 of 166) of orthopaedic surgery residency programs had a clearly stated policy on their program website. Overall, 81% (134 of 166) had policy information on the institution's GME website; 7% (12 of 166) of programs required direct communication with program coordinators to obtain policy information. Further, 9% (15 of 166) of programs were deemed to not have an available written policy as mandated by the ACGME. A total of 21% of programs (35 of 166) offered designated parental leave pay, 29% (48 of 166) compensated through sick leave pay, and 50% (83 of166) deferred to federal law (FMLA) requiring up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave. CONCLUSIONS: Although 91% of programs meet the ACGME requirement of written parental leave policies, current parental leave policies in orthopaedic surgery are not easily accessible for prospective residents, and they do not provide clear compensation and length of leave information. Only 3% (5 of 166) of orthopaedic surgery residency programs had a clearly stated leave policy accessible on the program's website. Substantial improvements would be gained if every orthopaedic residency program clearly outlined the parental leave policy on their residency program website, including compensation and length of leave, particularly in light of the 2019 American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery changes allowing time away to be averaged over the 5 years of training. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Parental leave policies are increasingly relevant to today's trainees []. Applicants to orthopaedic surgery today value work/life balance including protected parental leave [].

Resident Surgical Skills Web-Based Evaluation: A Comparison of 2 Assessment Tools.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of surgical skill competency is necessary as graduate medical education moves toward a competency-based curriculum. This study by the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) and the Council of Orthopaedic Residency Directors (CORD) compares 2 web-based evaluation tools that assess the level of autonomy that is demonstrated by residents during surgical procedures in the operating room as measured by faculty. METHODS: Two hundred and ninety-four residents from 16 orthopaedic surgery residency programs were evaluated by 370 faculty using 2 web-based evaluation tools in a crossover design in which residents requested faculty review of their surgical skills before starting a case. One thousand, one hundred and fifty Ottawa Surgical Competency Operating Room Evaluation (O-Score) assessments, which included a 9-question evaluation of 8 steps of the surgical procedure, were compared with 1,186 P-score evaluations, which included a single-question summative evaluation. Twenty-five different surgical procedures were evaluated. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in rates of resident requests or faculty completion of the 2 scores. The most common surgical procedures that were assessed were total knee arthroplasty (n = 254, 11%), carpal tunnel release (n = 191, 8%), open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of stable hip fractures (n = 170, 7%), ORIF of simple ankle fractures (n = 169, 7%), and total hip arthroplasty (n = 166, 7%). Both instruments disclosed significant differences in competency among entry, intermediate, and advanced-level residents. The findings support the construct validity of the evaluation method. The survey results indicated that >70% of the faculty were confident that use of either the P-score or the O-score allowed them to distinguish a resident who can perform the surgery independently from one who needs additional training. CONCLUSIONS: This research has led to the modification of the O-score and the P-score into a combined OP-score instrument. The ABOS envisions that the OP-score instrument can be used with an expanded number of surgical procedures as a required element of residency training in the near future. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study allows the profession of orthopaedic surgery education to take a leadership role in the measurement of competence for surgical skills for orthopaedic surgeons in residency training, an important clinically relevant topic to the practice of orthopaedic surgery.

Epidemiology of congenital upper limb anomalies in a midwest United States population: an assessment using the Oberg, Manske, and Tonkin classification.

PURPOSE: To examine the relative presentation frequency of children with upper limb congenital anomalies at 3 Midwestern referral centers using the Oberg, Manske, and Tonkin (OMT) classification and to assess the utility of this new classification system. METHODS: 641 individuals with 653 congenital upper extremity anomalies were identified at 3 hospitals in 2 large metropolitan areas during a 1-year interval. Patients were identified prospectively and the specific upper extremity anomaly and any associated syndromes were confirmed using medical records and radiographs. We applied the OMT classification that categorizes anomalies using a dysmorphology outline as malformations, dysplasias, deformations, and syndromes, and assessed its utility and ease of use. RESULTS: There were 480 extremities (74%) with a limb malformation including 184 involving the entire limb. Arthrogryposis was the most common of these (53 extremities). Anomalies affecting only the hand plate accounted for 62% (296) of the malformations. Of these, radial polydactyly (15%) was the most common specific anomaly, followed by symbrachydactyly (13%) and cleft hand (11%). Dysplasias were noted in 86 extremities; 55 of these were multiple hereditary exostoses. There were 87 extremities with deformations and 58 of these were trigger digits. A total of 109 children had a syndrome or association. Constriction ring sequence was most common. The OMT was straightforward to use and most anomalies could be easily assigned. There were a few conditions, such as Madelung deformity and symbrachydactyly, that would benefit from clarification on how to best classify them. CONCLUSIONS: Malformations were the most common congenital anomalies in the 653 upper extremities evaluated over a 1-year period at 3 institutions. We were able to classify all individuals using the OMT classification system.

Functional assessment aided by motion laboratory studies.

The physician needs to integrate the results of the assessment of overall patterns of functional use (Table 1), static contractures, dynamic deformities of motor imbalance for multiple levels of involvement (shoulder, elbow, wrist, and hand), and sensory deficiencies. This information is combined with a general assessment of the child's mentation, motivation, and generalized medical condition. Certain patients benefit most from surgical intervention in cerebral palsy. Patients with spastic deformities or flaccid control of specific movements can be helped significantly. In patients with flaccid control of certain movements, such as absent ability to extend the wrist or abduct the thumb, surgery is centered on tendon transfers to augment the patient's ability to perform that movement. In patients with excessive spasticity or musculotendinous contracture, surgery is centered on muscle lengthening. In general, patients with athetosis are not treated surgically; the only surgical treatment considered for the athetotic patient is fusion, as this helps preposition the limb in a desired position and "simplifies" the system for the patient to control. Sensibility deficiencies do not preclude effective tendon transfer but do limit the overall use of the limb; patients with sensibility deficiencies need to be coached to use visual input as their afferent information. Motor deficiencies can be assessed by observation, examination, functional testing, and motion laboratory analysis. Combining an assessment of shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist, thumb, and finger abilities and disabilities helps provide the physician with an overall plan of upper limb reconstruction using soft tissue releases, tendon transfers, and joint stabilization procedures to address the upper limb functional deficiencies. The ideal candidate for tendon transfer surgery is 7 years of age or older so they can be cooperative with postoperative rehabilitation and motivated to improve the use of their limb. Children with passive use of their limb (Functional Use Classification levels 1-3) can be improved most, on average 2.7 levels to active use of their limb (Functional Use Classification levels 4-6). An overall treatment plan is synthesized, taking into account the child's capabilities, disabilities, and potential, in the context of the child's age and expectations. The assessment techniques discussed in this article are the first step to appropriate treatment.